Mallmann André Luiz Silveira, de Moraes Daniel Nóbrega, Dória Lucas Denardi, Dos Santos Leonardo Peterson, Pilotti Stephanie, de Souza Antunes Mayra Angélica, Steinmetz Laura Fontana, de Souza Thauan Júnior Santos, Hax Vanessa, Ribeiro Jerri Luiz, Xavier Ricardo Machado, da Silva Chakr Rafael Mendonça
Postgraduate Program in Medical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Adv Rheumatol. 2025 Jul 28;65(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s42358-025-00468-1.
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) often leads to decreased muscle strength and mass, impairing physical performance and causing disability. Interventions with resistance exercise (RE) is an effective non-pharmacological approach to mitigate these issues. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of interventions with RE on muscle strength, muscle mass, physical performance, physical disability, and quality of life (QOL) in SSc patients, as well as to assess its adherence and safety.
A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on a PICOS framework: Patient = Systemic Sclerosis; Intervention = Resistance exercise; Study design = Randomized clinical trials. Searches were performed across MEDLINE (PubMed), PMC, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and EMBASE up to January 2025.
Ten randomized clinical trials, including 422 participants (~85% female), were eligible for analysis. Participants' ages ranged from 42 to 64 years, with body mass indices between 22.5 and 28.0 kg/m. The intervention period was standardized to 12 weeks. Interventions with RE significantly improved muscle strength (SMD = 2.76 kg; 95% CI, 1.32 to 4.20; p = 0.0002) and functional disability (SMD = -0.47; 95% CI, -0.93 to -0.00; p = 0.05) compared to controls. Interventions with RE also showed superiority in the physical component of QOL (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.81; p = 0.03). Although enhanced physical performance was observed, statistical pooling was not possible due to limited data. Interventions with RE had a low incidence of adverse events, but data on disease progression and adherence were insufficient.
Interventions with RE benefits muscle strength, physical function, and QOL in SSc patients, though optimal protocols and adherence strategies need further investigation. More robust studies are required to refine training methods and enhance clinical trial designs.
系统性硬化症(SSc)常导致肌肉力量和质量下降,损害身体机能并造成残疾。进行抗阻运动(RE)干预是缓解这些问题的一种有效的非药物方法。本系统评价旨在评估RE干预对SSc患者肌肉力量、肌肉质量、身体机能、身体残疾状况及生活质量(QOL)的影响,并评估其依从性和安全性。
基于PICOS框架进行系统评价和荟萃分析:患者=系统性硬化症;干预=抗阻运动;研究设计=随机临床试验。截至2025年1月,在MEDLINE(PubMed)、PMC、科学网、考克兰图书馆、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区卫生科学数据库以及EMBASE中进行了检索。
10项随机临床试验符合分析条件,共纳入422名参与者(约85%为女性)。参与者年龄在42至64岁之间,体重指数在22.5至28.0kg/m之间。干预期标准化为12周。与对照组相比,RE干预显著改善了肌肉力量(标准化均数差[SMD]=2.76kg;95%置信区间[CI],1.32至4.20;p=0.0002)和功能残疾状况(SMD=-0.47;95%CI,-0.93至-0.00;p=0.05)。RE干预在QOL的身体维度方面也显示出优势(SMD=0.42;95%CI,0.04至0.81;p=0.03)。尽管观察到身体机能有所改善,但由于数据有限,无法进行统计合并。RE干预的不良事件发生率较低,但关于疾病进展和依从性的数据不足。
RE干预对SSc患者的肌肉力量、身体功能和QOL有益,不过最佳方案和依从性策略仍需进一步研究。需要更有力的研究来完善训练方法并改进临床试验设计。