Marić Nikolina, Jokšić-Mazinjanin Radojka, Đuričin Aleksandar, Ivanišević Luka, Rakić Goran, Gojković Zoran, Šarkanović Mirka Lukić, Zelić Milena Jokšić, Vasović Lucija, Vasović Velibor
Institute for Emergency Medical Services Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Medical Faculty, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia.
Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 1;13(7):1620. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071620.
: Pain is the most frequently reported symptom in over 90% of patients presenting with traumatic injuries, and three-quarters of patients are discharged from emergency departments experiencing moderate to severe pain. The objective of this study was to compare the frequency of analgesic administration between patients with chest pain presumed to be of cardiac origin and those with suspected bone fractures as well as to assess whether significant differences exist between these two groups. : A retrospective, observational study was conducted. Patients were categorized into two groups: Group 1-patients with angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, or non-specific chest pain; and Group 2-patients with a preliminary diagnosis of bone fracture made by the attending physician at the scene. : A total of 1189 patients were included in this study, with 503 (42.3%) in Group 1 and 686 (57.7%) in Group 2 (χ = 28.166; < 0.001). Analgesic administration was significantly more frequent among patients in Group 1 than in Group 2 (χ = 23.187; < 0.001). Within Group 1, the highest rate of analgesic use was recorded in patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction. In Group 2, analgesics were administered to 36.4% of patients with suspected trunk bone fractures, while only 7.1% of patients with suspected cranial fractures received analgesic therapy. Pain intensity scores were not available for either group. : The administration of analgesic treatment was significantly more common among patients presenting with chest pain of presumed cardiac origin than among those with suspected bone fractures, including fractures involving multiple body regions.
在超过90%的创伤患者中,疼痛是最常报告的症状,并且四分之三的患者从急诊科出院时仍有中度至重度疼痛。本研究的目的是比较疑似心脏源性胸痛患者和疑似骨折患者之间使用镇痛药的频率,并评估这两组之间是否存在显著差异。:进行了一项回顾性观察研究。患者被分为两组:第1组——患有心绞痛、急性心肌梗死或非特异性胸痛的患者;第2组——由现场主治医生初步诊断为骨折的患者。:本研究共纳入1189例患者,第1组503例(42.3%),第2组686例(57.7%)(χ = 28.166;<0.001)。第1组患者使用镇痛药的频率显著高于第2组(χ = 23.187;<0.001)。在第1组中,诊断为急性心肌梗死的患者使用镇痛药的比例最高。在第2组中,36.4%的疑似躯干骨折患者使用了镇痛药,而只有7.1%的疑似颅骨骨折患者接受了镇痛治疗。两组均无疼痛强度评分。:与疑似骨折患者(包括涉及多个身体部位的骨折)相比,疑似心脏源性胸痛患者使用镇痛治疗更为常见。