Cetin Murat, Kaya Bora, Kilic Turgay Yilmaz, Hanoğlu Nazife Didem, Gökhan Şervan, Eroğlu Serkan Emre, Akar Sakine Neval, Cekic Ozgen Gonenc, Polat Dicle, Üstsoy Emre, Çınar Orhan, Yilmaz Serkan
Department of First Aid and Emergency, Vocational School, İzmir Tınaztepe University, Izmir, Turkey.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Kocaeli Derince Education and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Turk J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 29;21(4):189-197. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.329633. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
This study aimed to evaluate pain management practices in the emergency departments (EDs) in Turkey and to evaluate the prevalence and etiologies of oligoanalgesia to identify possible improvement strategies.
This multicenter cross-sectional observational study was conducted in 10 tertiary care hospitals in Turkey. Patients who were admitted to the ED with pain chief complaints were included in the study. Both patients and physicians were surveyed with two separate forms by the research associates, respectively. The patient survey collected data about the pain and the interventions from the patients' perspective. The pain was evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale. The physician survey collected data to assess the differences between study centers on pain management strategies and physician attitudes in pain management.
Ten emergency physicians and 740 patients (male/female: 365/375) enrolled in the study. The median pain score at admission at both triage and ED was 7 (interquartile range: 5-8). The most frequent type of pain at admission was headache ( = 184, 24.7%). The most common analgesics ordered by physicians were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ( = 505, 67.9%), and the most frequent route of administration was intramuscular injection ( = 396, 53.2%). About half of the patients ( = 366, 49.2%) received analgesics 10-30 min from ED admission. The posttreatment median pain score decreased to 3 ( < 0.001). About 79.2% of patients did not need a second analgesic administration ( = 589), and opioid analgesics were the most frequently administered analgesic if the second application was required. Physicians prescribed an analgesic at discharge from the ED in 55.6% of the patients ( = 414) and acute pain was present in 7.5% ( = 56) of the patients.
Our study on the pain management practices in the EDs in Turkey suggested that high rate of intramuscular analgesic use and long emergency room stay durations are issues that should constitute the focus of our quality improvement efforts in pain management.
本研究旨在评估土耳其急诊科的疼痛管理实践,并评估镇痛不足的患病率及病因,以确定可能的改进策略。
本多中心横断面观察性研究在土耳其的10家三级护理医院开展。纳入因疼痛为主诉而入住急诊科的患者。研究助理分别用两种不同的表格对患者和医生进行调查。患者调查问卷从患者角度收集有关疼痛及干预措施的数据。使用数字评分量表评估疼痛。医生调查问卷收集数据,以评估各研究中心在疼痛管理策略及医生对疼痛管理的态度方面的差异。
10名急诊科医生和740例患者(男/女:365/375)纳入本研究。分诊时及在急诊科入院时的疼痛评分中位数均为7(四分位间距:5 - 8)。入院时最常见的疼痛类型是头痛(n = 184,24.7%)。医生最常开具的镇痛药是非甾体类抗炎药(n = 505,67.9%),最常用的给药途径是肌肉注射(n = 396,53.2%)。约一半患者(n = 366,49.2%)在急诊科入院后10 - 30分钟接受了镇痛药治疗。治疗后疼痛评分中位数降至3(P < 0.001)。约79.2%的患者(n = 589)无需再次给予镇痛药,若需要再次给药,阿片类镇痛药是最常使用的镇痛药。55.6%的患者(n = 414)在急诊科出院时医生开具了镇痛药,7.5%的患者(n = 56)仍存在急性疼痛。
我们对土耳其急诊科疼痛管理实践的研究表明,肌肉注射镇痛药的高使用率和急诊室停留时间长是我们在疼痛管理质量改进工作中应关注的问题。