• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特殊教育需求人群的职业适应性:实证证据与新兴研究方向的系统综述

Career Adaptability in Special Educational Needs Populations: A Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence and Emerging Research Directions.

作者信息

Li Cheng, Yang Lan, Sin Kuen Fung, Gao Fengzhan, Romano Alessandra

机构信息

Institute of Special Needs and Inclusive Education (ISNIE), The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

D1-1/F-44, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;15(7):927. doi: 10.3390/bs15070927.

DOI:10.3390/bs15070927
PMID:40723711
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12292453/
Abstract

Despite robust evidence linking career adaptability (CA) to positive vocational and psychosocial outcomes in general populations, research on the CA among individuals with special educational needs (SEN) remains limited. Prior reviews have largely overlooked the distinct challenges faced by SEN populations. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review across five major databases, yielding an initial pool of 81 studies. Following rigorous screening, only eight quantitative studies met the inclusion criteria, reflecting the early stage of the research in this area. The included studies span diverse SEN groups, including individuals with visual impairments, intellectual disabilities, and mental health conditions. CA was consistently found to be associated with adaptive outcomes such as self-esteem, self-efficacy, hope, and career satisfaction. However, the literature is characterized by methodological limitations, notably the predominance of cross-sectional designs, the underrepresentation of neurodevelopmental conditions (e.g., ASD, ADHD), and a lack of cross-cultural perspectives and standardized instruments specifically adapted to SEN learners. Future studies should focus on the need for longitudinal and mixed-method designs, contextually cross-cultural research, and inclusive measurement tools. Furthermore, exploring the ecological and emotional predictors of CA; expanding to underrepresented SEN subgroups; and evaluating diverse interventions beyond mentoring are essential to informing tailored educational and vocational support for individuals with SEN.

摘要

尽管有充分的证据表明职业适应性(CA)与普通人群的积极职业和心理社会成果相关,但针对有特殊教育需求(SEN)个体的职业适应性研究仍然有限。先前的综述在很大程度上忽略了有特殊教育需求人群所面临的独特挑战。为了填补这一空白,我们对五个主要数据库进行了系统综述,初步筛选出81项研究。经过严格筛选,只有八项定量研究符合纳入标准,这反映了该领域研究尚处于早期阶段。纳入的研究涵盖了不同的有特殊教育需求群体,包括视力障碍者、智力障碍者和有心理健康问题的人。研究一致发现,职业适应性与诸如自尊、自我效能感、希望和职业满意度等适应性成果相关。然而,现有文献存在方法学上的局限性,尤其是横断面设计占主导地位、神经发育障碍(如自闭症谱系障碍、注意力缺陷多动障碍)研究不足,以及缺乏跨文化视角和专门为有特殊教育需求的学习者量身定制的标准化工具。未来的研究应侧重于纵向和混合方法设计的必要性、情境化的跨文化研究以及包容性的测量工具。此外,探索职业适应性的生态和情感预测因素;扩大到研究不足的有特殊教育需求亚群体;以及评估除指导之外的各种干预措施,对于为有特殊教育需求的个体提供量身定制的教育和职业支持至关重要。

相似文献

1
Career Adaptability in Special Educational Needs Populations: A Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence and Emerging Research Directions.特殊教育需求人群的职业适应性:实证证据与新兴研究方向的系统综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;15(7):927. doi: 10.3390/bs15070927.
2
Education support services for improving school engagement and academic performance of children and adolescents with a chronic health condition.改善患有慢性病的儿童和青少年的学校参与度和学业成绩的教育支持服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 8;2(2):CD011538. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011538.pub2.
3
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
4
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
5
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
6
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing factor structure and reliability of the career adaptability scale in students with special educational needs.评估有特殊教育需求学生职业适应能力量表的因素结构和信度。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 15;14:1030218. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1030218. eCollection 2023.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
An ecological approach to understanding barriers to employment for youth with disabilities compared to their typically developing peers: views of youth, employers, and job counselors.
与发育正常的同龄人相比,采用生态学方法理解残疾青年就业障碍:青年、雇主和职业顾问的观点
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):701-11. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.939775. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
4
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.GRADE:关于证据质量评级和推荐强度的新共识。
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD.