Burns Kristy, Ellis Louise A, De Almeida Neto Abilio, Lopes Carla Vanessa Alves, Amin Janaki
Department of Health Systems and Populations, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2113, Australia.
SafeWork New South Wales, Gosford, NSW 2250, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 20;22(7):974. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22070974.
Despite increasing interest in workplace mental health, limited attention has been paid to the role of industry-based intermediary organisations in delivering mental health support. This scoping review addresses this gap by examining the mental health-related activities of industry intermediaries in Australia. A systematic search of the peer-reviewed and grey literature from 2010 to 2023, supported by expert consultation and conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, identified 35 relevant records. Interventions were categorised using the WHO Guidelines on Mental Health at Work and evaluation activities coded according to the Conceptual Framework for Implementation Research. Organisational-level interventions were the most common (54%), followed by individual psychosocial support for distressed workers (40%). Mental health-specific intermediaries offered more WHO-recommended interventions and were more likely to evaluate their programs. Although evaluations suggested improvements in mental health literacy and high program acceptability, evidence of impact on worker health and organisational outcomes was limited. The findings suggest that intermediary organisations-including unions, business associations, and professional bodies-are well positioned to support tailored mental health strategies. However, the current lack of robust evaluations limits the understanding of their effectiveness. Future efforts should prioritise industry-research collaborations to strengthen the evidence base and inform sustainable investment in workplace mental health initiatives.
尽管人们对工作场所心理健康的兴趣日益浓厚,但对于行业中介组织在提供心理健康支持方面的作用却关注有限。本范围综述通过考察澳大利亚行业中介机构与心理健康相关的活动来填补这一空白。在专家咨询的支持下,按照PRISMA-ScR指南对2010年至2023年的同行评审文献和灰色文献进行系统检索,共识别出35条相关记录。干预措施根据世界卫生组织《工作场所心理健康指南》进行分类,评估活动则按照实施研究概念框架进行编码。组织层面的干预最为常见(54%),其次是为受困扰员工提供的个体心理社会支持(40%)。特定心理健康中介机构提供了更多世界卫生组织推荐的干预措施,且更有可能对其项目进行评估。尽管评估表明心理健康素养有所提高,项目接受度也很高,但对员工健康和组织成果产生影响的证据有限。研究结果表明,包括工会、商业协会和专业团体在内的中介组织具备支持量身定制心理健康策略的良好条件。然而,目前缺乏有力的评估限制了对其有效性的理解。未来的努力应优先开展行业与研究的合作,以加强证据基础,并为工作场所心理健康倡议的可持续投资提供信息。