• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钛面部植入物个体的微聚焦超声:一例报告

Micro-Focused Ultrasound on an Individual with Titanium Facial Implants: A Case Report.

作者信息

Panithaporn Dissapong

机构信息

The Demis Clinic, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.

出版信息

Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2025 Jul 22;18:1769-1773. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S533425. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/CCID.S533425
PMID:40727615
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12301124/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Both micro-focused ultrasound (MFU) and monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) interventions are relatively safe and well tolerated as a non-invasive approach to achieve rejuvenating effects, with patients reporting limited adverse effects. However, MRF uses an electrical current which can induce heating in metal, potentially causing burns or thermal injury in the skin or tissue around the implant, whereas MFU delivers focused high-energy ultrasound, which does not induce electrical currents in metal.

CASE PRESENTATION

This report describes the case of a 28-year-old Thai male, who received titanium implants in the mandible bone, the mandible chin, the maxillary bone and the zygoma bone, seven years before. Because of his wish for a more sculpted and lifted facial appearance, the patient was treated with Ulthera Legacy in 2021 and with Ulthera Prime in 2024. With Ulthera Prime, visualization has significantly improved, which decreased the need to skip areas, leading to improved, more consistent results.

CONCLUSION

This case study suggests that Ulthera Prime could be an option for skin firming and lifting effects for people with facial implants. Further research will be needed to corroborate this finding in a larger population.

摘要

引言

微聚焦超声(MFU)和单极射频(MRF)干预作为一种实现年轻化效果的非侵入性方法,相对安全且耐受性良好,患者报告的不良反应有限。然而,MRF使用电流,可能会在金属中产生热量,从而可能在植入物周围的皮肤或组织中导致烧伤或热损伤,而MFU则发射聚焦高能超声,不会在金属中感应出电流。

病例介绍

本报告描述了一名28岁泰国男性的病例,他在七年前接受了下颌骨、下颌下巴、上颌骨和颧骨的钛植入物。由于他希望面部外观更有型且紧致,该患者在2021年接受了Ulthera Legacy治疗,并在2024年接受了Ulthera Prime治疗。使用Ulthera Prime后,可视化效果显著改善,减少了需要跳过区域的情况,从而获得了更好、更一致的效果。

结论

本案例研究表明,对于有面部植入物的人来说,Ulthera Prime可能是一种实现皮肤紧致效果的选择。需要进一步研究以在更大规模人群中证实这一发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6650/12301124/5c3354936128/CCID-18-1769-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6650/12301124/7e7fa4e60f3e/CCID-18-1769-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6650/12301124/763cfe51ae12/CCID-18-1769-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6650/12301124/992489ed651d/CCID-18-1769-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6650/12301124/55e6c8fbb884/CCID-18-1769-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6650/12301124/5c3354936128/CCID-18-1769-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6650/12301124/7e7fa4e60f3e/CCID-18-1769-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6650/12301124/763cfe51ae12/CCID-18-1769-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6650/12301124/992489ed651d/CCID-18-1769-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6650/12301124/55e6c8fbb884/CCID-18-1769-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6650/12301124/5c3354936128/CCID-18-1769-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Micro-Focused Ultrasound on an Individual with Titanium Facial Implants: A Case Report.钛面部植入物个体的微聚焦超声:一例报告
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2025 Jul 22;18:1769-1773. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S533425. eCollection 2025.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
3
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review.上颌窦提升术用于牙种植修复的有效性:一项Cochrane系统评价
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Spring;3(1):7-26.
9
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

本文引用的文献

1
Microfocused Ultrasound With Visualization: A Systematic Review of Adverse Events and Risk of Subsequent Facelift Compromise.
Dermatol Surg. 2025 Apr 1;51(4):424-429. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000004510. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
2
Subjective evaluation of monopolar radiofrequency treatment by patients in aesthetic rejuvenation.患者对单极射频治疗在美容年轻化中的主观评价。
Skin Res Technol. 2024 Feb;30(2):e13593. doi: 10.1111/srt.13593.
3
A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Microfocused Ultrasound for Facial Skin Tightening.微聚焦超声对面部皮肤紧致疗效的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;20(2):1522. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021522.
4
Minimally Invasive Approach to Skin Tightening of the Face and Body: Systematic Review of Monopolar and Bipolar Radiofrequency Devices.面部和身体皮肤紧致的微创方法:单极和双极射频设备的系统评价
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Oct 1;150(4):771-780. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009535. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
5
Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of radiofrequency for face and neck rejuvenation: A systematic review.评估射频对面颈部年轻化的有效性和安全性:系统评价。
Lasers Surg Med. 2022 Jan;54(1):27-45. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23506. Epub 2021 Dec 19.
6
Consensus Recommendations for 4th Generation Non-Microneedling Monopolar Radiofrequency for Skin Tightening: A Delphi Consensus Panel.第四代非微针单极射频皮肤紧致的共识性建议:德尔菲共识小组
J Drugs Dermatol. 2020 Jan 1;19(1):20-26. doi: 10.36849/JDD.2020.4807.
7
Microfocused Ultrasound for Skin Tightening.用于皮肤紧致的微聚焦超声
Clin Plast Surg. 2016 Jul;43(3):577-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 May 4.
8
Microfocused Ultrasound for Facial Photorejuvenation: A Review.用于面部光老化修复的微聚焦超声:综述
Facial Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;32(3):269-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584129. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
9
Evaluation of a microfocused ultrasound system for improving skin laxity and tightening in the lower face.评估一种用于改善下脸部皮肤松弛和紧致的微聚焦超声系统。
Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Sep;34(7):1099-110. doi: 10.1177/1090820X14541956. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
10
Noninvasive treatment of the neck.颈部的无创治疗。
Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2014 May;22(2):191-202. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2014.01.011.