Shukla Priyanka, Mendhe Vinod Atmaram, Kamble Alka D, Kumari Sangam, Singh VikramPartap
CSIRCentral Institute of Mining and Fuel Research, Dhanbad 826 015, Jharkhand, India.
AcSIRAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad 201002, Uttar Pradesh, India.
ACS Omega. 2025 Jul 11;10(28):30060-30086. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c11499. eCollection 2025 Jul 22.
CO storage in various geological formations presents a feasible option for reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) in the atmosphere. The most viable and technoeconomic method involves injecting CO into deep, unmineable coal seams and shale beds to enhance CH recovery. CO exhibits a greater affinity with coal, shale, and associated siliciclastic-organic rich rock compared to CH. However, detailed information about the coal and shale reservoirs is crucial prior to the CO injection and enhanced CH recovery. This study aims to evaluate the petrographic, geochemical (proximate, ultimate), and pore-matrix characteristics of coal and shale samples to assess the enhanced CH recovery through CO injection. Pore distribution studies, conducted through micropetrography, Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy photographs, and low-pressure BET sorption isotherms, categorized the pore structures of coal and shale into three types: cylindrical, slit, and wedge-shaped. These pore structures, particularly the end-opening of the pores, were found to be suitable for gas storage and release. Clays intermixed with organic matter formed pores, which created suitable adsorption sites for CH and CO. The studied coal exhibited higher CH diffusivity and gas saturation compared to shale, favoring CH recovery with CO injection. The dominating collotelinite maceral has a positive relation with the Langmuir volume ( ) of CH and CO favoring greater sorption in coal/shale. Conversely, the semifusinite and sporinite macerals influence gas accumulation and diffusivity. The CH diffusivity of coal seam ranges from 2.355 × 10 to 4.019 × 10 min (avg. 3.197 × 10 min), while shale diffusivity ranges from 1.185 × 10 to 2.371 × 10 min (avg. 1.531 × 10 min). The higher diffusivity in coal is supported by the pore distribution and cleat intensity. The sorption ratio of CH and CO, which is directly proportional to in situ gas, indicates an increase in CH diffusion and CO adsorption. Increasing vitrinite reflectance (VR) values indicate improved maturity of coal and shale, associated with changes in macromolecular structures and pore-matrix systems suitable for CO storage.
将二氧化碳(CO)存储于各种地质构造中是减少大气中温室气体排放(GHG)的一种可行选择。最可行且具有技术经济优势的方法是将CO注入深部不可开采的煤层和页岩层中,以提高甲烷(CH)的采收率。与CH相比,CO与煤、页岩以及相关的硅质碎屑-富含有机质岩石具有更强的亲和力。然而,在注入CO并提高CH采收率之前,掌握有关煤和页岩储层的详细信息至关重要。本研究旨在评估煤和页岩样品的岩相学、地球化学(工业分析、元素分析)以及孔隙-基质特征,以评估通过注入CO提高CH采收率的效果。通过显微岩相学、场发射扫描电子显微镜照片以及低压BET吸附等温线进行的孔隙分布研究,将煤和页岩的孔隙结构分为三种类型:圆柱形、狭缝形和楔形。发现这些孔隙结构,特别是孔隙的开口端,适合气体存储和释放。与有机质混合的粘土形成了孔隙,为CH和CO创造了合适的吸附位点。与页岩相比,所研究的煤表现出更高的CH扩散率和气体饱和度,有利于通过注入CO来采收CH。主要的镜质组与CH和CO的兰氏体积( )呈正相关,有利于在煤/页岩中进行更大程度的吸附。相反,半丝质体和孢子体对气体聚集和扩散有影响。煤层的CH扩散率范围为2.