Ragborg Lærke C, Heegaard Martin, Dragsted Casper, Nielsen Emil, Morgen Søren S, Dahl Benny, Gehrchen Martin
Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09150-y.
The purpose of this study was to report the one-year posterior fusion rate in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with supplemental lumbar interbody fusion (LIF).
Patients with ASD who underwent PSF with supplemental ALIF and/or XLIF between October 2021 and December 2023 were prospectively enrolled. Fusion was assessed using fine-cut CT scans with Metal Artifact Reduction (MAR) and multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) one year after surgery, and each level was graded for interbody and posterolateral fusion (Glassman Classification). Interbody and posterolateral fusion were reported as individual fusion grades (1-4) and dichotomized as; Fusion (1-2) and non-fusion (3-4).
Of 57 enrolled patients, 50 had CT scans performed with 53 ALIF and 48 XLIF-treated levels. The mean age was 63.5 ± 11.6 years and 36 (72%) were female. Solid fusion of the interbody and/or posterolateral fusion assessed at the level of the LIF was obtained in 48 (96%) of the patients. Solid interbody fusion was significantly more frequent with ALIF; 49 (93%) compared to XLIF; 26 (54%) (p < 0.001). Additionally, the fusion score was significantly different with ALIF; median 1 [IQR 1-1] compared to XLIF median 2 [IQR 1-3] (p < 0.001). The posterolateral fusion rates did not differ significantly between ALIF (92%) and XLIF (88%) levels/segments (p = 0.470). Additionally, median Glassman scores for posterolateral fusion were similar: ALIF 1 [1, 1] vs. XLIF 1 [1, 2] (p = 0.370). Mechanical failure was observed in 9 patients (Displacement of the cage: 3, sacral screw loosening: 3, screw loosening: 1, rod breakage: 2) four of which were at the level of the LIF. Three patients underwent revision surgery at the level of the LIF.
Patients undergoing posterior instrumented fusion for ASD with supplemental anterior interbody fusion obtained high fusion rates assessed with CT. Higher rates of interbody fusion were observed in ALIF than in XLIF-treated levels. Despite differences in interbody fusion, similar posterolateral fusion was seen one year after surgery.
本研究旨在报告接受后路脊柱融合术(PSF)并辅以腰椎椎间融合术(LIF)的成人脊柱畸形(ASD)患者的一年后路融合率。
前瞻性纳入2021年10月至2023年12月期间接受PSF并辅以ALIF和/或XLIF的ASD患者。术后一年使用具有金属伪影减少(MAR)和多平面重建(MPR)的薄层CT扫描评估融合情况,并根据格拉斯曼分类法对每个节段的椎间融合和后外侧融合进行分级。椎间融合和后外侧融合分别报告为个体融合等级(1 - 4级),并分为融合(1 - 2级)和未融合(3 - 4级)。
在57名纳入研究的患者中,50名进行了CT扫描,共涉及53个接受ALIF治疗的节段和48个接受XLIF治疗的节段。平均年龄为63.5±11.6岁,36名(72%)为女性。在48名(96%)患者中,LIF节段的椎间融合和/或后外侧融合实现了坚固融合。ALIF组的坚固椎间融合明显更常见;49个(93%),而XLIF组为26个(54%)(p < 0.001)。此外,ALIF组与XLIF组的融合评分有显著差异;ALIF组中位数为1[四分位间距1 - 1],XLIF组中位数为2[四分位间距1 - 3](p < 0.001)。ALIF组(92%)和XLIF组(88%)的后外侧融合率在节段水平上无显著差异(p = 0.470)。此外,后外侧融合的格拉斯曼评分中位数相似:ALIF组为1[1, 1],XLIF组为1[1, 2](p = 0.370)。9名患者出现机械性失败(椎间融合器移位:3例,骶骨螺钉松动:3例,螺钉松动:1例,棒断裂:2例),其中4例发生在LIF节段。3名患者在LIF节段接受了翻修手术。
接受后路器械融合术并辅以前路椎间融合术治疗ASD的患者,通过CT评估获得了较高的融合率。ALIF治疗节段的椎间融合率高于XLIF治疗节段。尽管椎间融合存在差异,但术后一年后外侧融合情况相似。