Ahmed Farah, Woodhead Charlotte, Hossaini Ali, Stanley Nathan, Ensum Lucy, Rhead Rebecca, Onwumere Juliana, Mir Ghazala, Dyer Jacqueline, Hatch Stephani L
Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
ESRC Centre for Society and Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 29;20(7):e0327552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327552. eCollection 2025.
Despite a preponderance of evidence and considerable resources, health and social inequities persist, and in many cases, are widening. These inequities are not simply the result of passive structural and economic conditions but are actively maintained through institutional processes, norms, and ideologies that uphold the status quo. Reform within health inequities research, policy, and health and social care practice is therefore critical to disrupting these entrenched systems and catalysing both bottom-up and top-down change. We aimed to develop agreement for an iterative set of guiding principles underpinning ways of working for a newly formed Health and Social Equity Collective comprising researchers, community leaders, policymakers, and health and care professionals, seeking to address inequity by identifying and engaging the levers of change within and across institutions. The principles aim to inform a more inclusive and translational knowledge base through research practices, tackling entrenched inequalities in education, training, and capacity-building; and centring communities affected by health inequities through engagement and advocacy. We carried out a modified Delphi consensus process between March and September 2022 with Collective members and networks through online workshops and surveys. Out of 24 consensus statements developed and refined over a workshop and three successive survey rounds, we identified eleven key principles agreed upon by a majority of respondents. Two of these were rated high priority by over 75% of respondents, four by over 60% and five by over 50%. These could be grouped into three main topics detailing ways of working and change needed within: 'Knowledge and framing of health and social inequities, and incorporation into practice', 'Community engagement, involvement and peer research', and 'Organisational culture change', respectively. Given the pressing need to address inequities, these principles offer a grounding for future consensus building initiatives which also incorporate a wider diversity of perspectives, and which should be iteratively updated with ongoing learning from health equity initiatives nationally and internationally.
尽管有大量证据和可观资源,但健康与社会不平等现象依然存在,而且在许多情况下还在加剧。这些不平等并非仅仅是被动的结构和经济状况所致,而是通过维护现状的制度流程、规范和意识形态积极维持的。因此,健康不平等研究、政策以及健康与社会护理实践方面的改革对于打破这些根深蒂固的体系并推动自下而上和自上而下的变革至关重要。我们旨在就一套迭代的指导原则达成共识,这些原则支撑着一个新成立的健康与社会公平联盟的工作方式,该联盟由研究人员、社区领袖、政策制定者以及健康和护理专业人员组成,力求通过识别和运用机构内部及跨机构的变革杠杆来解决不平等问题。这些原则旨在通过研究实践形成一个更具包容性和转化性的知识库,解决教育、培训和能力建设中根深蒂固的不平等问题;并通过参与和宣传,以受健康不平等影响的社区为核心。2022年3月至9月,我们通过在线研讨会和调查,与联盟成员及网络开展了一次经过改进的德尔菲共识达成过程。在一次研讨会和三轮连续调查中制定并完善的24条共识声明中,我们确定了大多数受访者认可的11条关键原则。其中两条被超过75%的受访者列为高度优先事项,四条被超过60%的受访者列为高度优先事项,五条被超过50%的受访者列为高度优先事项。这些原则可分为三个主要主题,分别详细阐述了内部工作方式和所需变革:“健康与社会不平等的知识与框架,并纳入实践”、“社区参与、介入和同伴研究”以及“组织文化变革”。鉴于解决不平等问题的迫切需求,这些原则为未来的共识构建倡议提供了基础,这些倡议还应纳入更广泛多样的观点,并应根据国内和国际健康公平倡议的持续学习进行迭代更新。