Beiras R, Concha-Graña E, Laranjeiro F M G, Fernández-González V, López-Ibáñez S, Moscoso-Pérez C, Vilas A, Muniategui-Lorenzo S
ECIMAT, Centro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, 36331 Vigo, Spain; Facultade de Ciencias do Mar, Universidade de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain.
Grupo Química Analítica Aplicada (QANAP), Instituto Universitario de Medio Ambiente (IUMA), Centro de Innovación Tecnolóxica en Edificación e Enxeñaría Civil (CITEEC), Universidade da Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2025 Jul 28;996:180116. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180116.
Due to recent regulations encouraging the reduction of single-use plastic waste, compostable plastics are replacing polyethylene (PE) for applications in the form of thin films. Seven commercial brands of compostable bags and three brands of PE bags (conventional, oxodegradable and recycled), as well as their corresponding resins, were assessed in terms of major components of the polymeric matrix, qualitative and quantitative composition in additives of bags and their leachates, and ecotoxicological effects on test species representative of the main marine taxa, namely microalgae, copepods, sea-urchin embryos, bivalves and fish. Polybutylene-adipate-terephthalate (PBAT), an oil-based polymer, was the main component of all compostable bags analysed, and most of them also included in their composition polylactic-acid (PLA) and starch. Compostable bags showed a higher number of chemical additives than conventional PE bags, and generally higher concentrations of phthalate plasticizers and organophosphate flame retardants. This includes chemicals registered in the EU as exhibiting acute and chronic aquatic toxicity levels 1 and 2. Following standard procedures for plastic leachates, no effects of any product were found on microalgae and fish larva, but bioplastics consistently showed a higher short term aquatic toxicity to marine invertebrates compared to PE items. None of the toxicity levels found though support concerning effects at environmentally relevant plastic densities. Remarkably higher levels of some metals were found in recycled PE compared to first-use conventional PE bags. In conclusion, based on these findings, compostable bags cannot be considered chemically or ecotoxicologically safer products than PE bags.
由于近期出台了鼓励减少一次性塑料垃圾的法规,可堆肥塑料正在取代聚乙烯(PE)用于薄膜形式的应用。对七个可堆肥袋商业品牌和三个PE袋品牌(传统型、可氧化降解型和回收型)及其相应的树脂,就聚合物基体的主要成分、袋子及其渗滤液中添加剂的定性和定量组成,以及对代表主要海洋类群的受试物种(即微藻、桡足类、海胆胚胎、双壳贝类和鱼类)的生态毒理学影响进行了评估。聚己二酸丁二醇酯-对苯二甲酸酯(PBAT),一种油基聚合物,是所有分析的可堆肥袋的主要成分,并且其中大多数还在其组成中包含聚乳酸(PLA)和淀粉。可堆肥袋显示出比传统PE袋更多的化学添加剂,并且通常邻苯二甲酸酯类增塑剂和有机磷酸酯类阻燃剂的浓度更高。这包括在欧盟注册为具有急性和慢性水生毒性1级和2级的化学品。按照塑料渗滤液的标准程序,未发现任何产品对微藻和鱼幼虫有影响,但与PE制品相比,生物塑料始终对海洋无脊椎动物表现出更高的短期水生毒性。然而,所发现的毒性水平均不支持在与环境相关的塑料密度下存在影响。与首次使用的传统PE袋相比,回收PE中某些金属的含量明显更高。总之,基于这些发现,可堆肥袋在化学或生态毒理学方面不能被认为是比PE袋更安全的产品。