Blass Beau, Mahoney Hannah, Lusk Jay B, Clark Amy G, Corsino Leonor, Hammill Bradley G
Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
University of North Carolina - Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 28;15(7):e092971. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092971.
This study aims to assess the association between neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation and outcomes reflecting comprehensive diabetes care (CDC).
Retrospective cohort study SETTING: US Medicare Advantage (MA) data, 2015-2020.
National sample of MA enrollees with diabetes.
Primary outcomes included six indicators of CDC from the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set: haemoglobin (Hb) A1c (HbA1c) testing, HbA1c control (<8%), HbA1c poor control (>9%), blood pressure control (<140/90 mm Hg), receipt of eye exams and medical attention for nephropathy.
There were 827 227 enrolments included in the final analysis. After adjusting for demographic (age, sex, race/ethnicity and dual eligibility) and regional characteristics (rurality and primary care providers per capita), high neighbourhood deprivation was associated only with worse glycaemic control (for HbA1c>9%, risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.07). This relationship was significant for white and Asian patients (RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.11 and RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.32, respectively); outcomes for black and Hispanic patients were worse overall but independent of neighbourhood deprivation (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.05 and RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.03, respectively). In the fully adjusted model, neighbourhood deprivation was not associated with measures that directly reflect access to care, including the occurrence of HbA1c testing and receipt of eye exams (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.04 and RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.05).
An increased risk of poor glycaemic control was observed for patients from areas of high neighbourhood deprivation, independent of individual socioeconomic status. Neighbourhood factors and their intersection with racial and ethnic disparities are important considerations for achieving equity in diabetes care.
本研究旨在评估社区社会经济剥夺与反映综合糖尿病护理(CDC)的结果之间的关联。
回顾性队列研究
2015 - 2020年美国医疗保险优势(MA)数据。
MA糖尿病参保者的全国样本。
主要结局包括来自医疗保健有效性数据和信息集的六个CDC指标:血红蛋白(Hb)A1c(糖化血红蛋白)检测、HbA1c控制(<8%)、HbA1c控制不佳(>9%)、血压控制(<140/90 mmHg)、接受眼科检查以及针对肾病的医疗关注。
最终分析纳入827227名参保者。在调整了人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、种族/族裔和双重资格)和区域特征(农村地区和人均初级保健提供者)后,社区高度剥夺仅与血糖控制较差相关(对于HbA1c>9%,风险比(RR)为1.04,95%置信区间为1.02至1.07)。这种关系在白人和亚洲患者中显著(RR分别为1.08,95%置信区间为1.05至1.11和RR为1.18,95%置信区间为1.05至1.32);黑人和西班牙裔患者的总体结局较差,但与社区剥夺无关(RR分别为1.00,95%置信区间为0.96至1.05和RR为0.98,95%置信区间为0.94至1.03)。在完全调整模型中,社区剥夺与直接反映获得护理情况的指标无关,包括HbA1c检测的发生和接受眼科检查(RR为0.99,95%置信区间为0.94至1.04和RR为1.03,95%置信区间为1.00至1.05)。
观察到社区高度剥夺地区的患者血糖控制不佳的风险增加,且与个体社会经济地位无关。社区因素及其与种族和族裔差异的交叉是实现糖尿病护理公平性的重要考虑因素。