Uddin Wasim, Khan Gulafsha, Narayan Sneha, Sharma Neha, Holeyachi Basavaraj S, Hakeem Md Abdul, Siva Archana Bharadwaj, Reddy P Anuradha
CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad, 500 007, India.
Department of Animal Health and Food Safety, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ås, Norway.
BMC Vet Res. 2025 Jul 29;21(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12917-025-04886-7.
species colonize the gastrointestinal tract of various hosts, and are of interest due to their potential zoonotic transmission and impact on health of humans and animals. Comprehensive studies involving wild animals from different locations are lacking, hindering our understanding of their host range, prevalence, and genetic diversity. We investigated the prevalence and genetic diversity of species in thirteen wild carnivore species across twenty-two captive locations in India by targeting a partial region of the 16S rRNA gene. We used sequences obtained from positive samples for phylogenetic analysis, and evaluated factors influencing prevalence. We analysed faecal samples of 985 individuals of which 286 (29%) tested positive for , spanning all the host species included in this study. prevalence is strongly related to host species and location, and varied from 7.3% in common leopard to 80% in Indian fox. Phylogenetic analysis identified 59 unique genotypes clustered into 11 groups of three major types: enterohepatic, gastric, and unsheathed. Diverse species associated with diseases in humans and domestic animals were observed, such as , , along with several novel genotypes which require formal classification. Overall, this study highlights the wide occurrence and high genetic diversity of species in captive wild carnivores in India. Our findings underscore the need for regular health assessments in captive facilities to monitor infections, which could impact health and management of endangered species. Future research should explore presence in biotic/ abiotic factors in zoo and free-ranging populations following One Health approaches.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12917-025-04886-7.
[某种微生物名称]定殖于多种宿主的胃肠道,因其潜在的人畜共患病传播以及对人类和动物健康的影响而备受关注。目前缺乏涉及不同地点野生动物的全面研究,这阻碍了我们对其宿主范围、流行率和遗传多样性的理解。我们通过靶向16S rRNA基因的部分区域,调查了印度22个圈养地点的13种野生食肉动物物种中[某种微生物名称]的流行率和遗传多样性。我们使用从阳性样本中获得的序列进行系统发育分析,并评估影响[某种微生物名称]流行率的因素。我们分析了985个个体的粪便样本,其中286个(29%)检测出[某种微生物名称]呈阳性,涵盖了本研究中所有的宿主物种。[某种微生物名称]的流行率与宿主物种和地点密切相关,从普通豹的7.3%到印度狐的80%不等。系统发育分析确定了59个独特的基因型,分为11组,属于三种主要的[某种微生物名称]类型:肝肠型、胃型和无鞘型。观察到与人类和家畜疾病相关的多种[某种微生物名称]物种,如[具体物种名称1]、[具体物种名称2],以及几种需要正式分类的新基因型。总体而言,本研究突出了印度圈养野生食肉动物中[某种微生物名称]物种的广泛存在和高遗传多样性。我们的研究结果强调了在圈养设施中定期进行健康评估以监测[某种微生物名称]感染的必要性,这可能会影响濒危物种的健康和管理。未来的研究应遵循“同一健康”方法,探索动物园和自由放养种群中生物/非生物因素中[某种微生物名称]的存在情况。
在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12917-025-04886-7获取的补充材料。