• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基台连接后不同角度莫氏锥度牙种植体直径稳定性的评估。

Assessment of Diameter Stability in Morse Taper Dental Implants with Different Angulations After Abutment Connection.

作者信息

Cordeiro Bruno Q S, Carvalho Waldimir R, Fonseca Edgard M, Machado Aldir N, Ghiraldini Bruna, Soares Michel A D, Casado Priscila L

机构信息

Post-Graduation in Dentistry Program, School of Dentistry, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Niterói 24020140, RJ, Brazil.

Prostheses Department, School of Dentistry, Fluminense Federal University (UFF), Niterói 24020140, RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 21;18(14):3403. doi: 10.3390/ma18143403.

DOI:10.3390/ma18143403
PMID:40731613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12299079/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modification of diameter stability after the abutment retention can result in a decrease in the applied torque or affect the peri-implant tissue, compromising the longevity of the treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate how different connection angles (11.5° and 16.0°) at the implant-abutment interface influence implant diameter stability under the manufacturer's recommended torque.

METHODS

Eighty Morse cone-type implant specimens were divided into two groups, with different internal conicity angles: 11.5° ( = 40) and 16.0° ( = 40). Implants varied in diameter (mm): 3.5, 3.8, 4.5, and 5.0. Initial measurements of the implants' external diameter were carried out. After these measurements, all implants received the abutment installation, and a final measurement of the external implant diameter was performed.

RESULTS

Considering the comparative analysis between the final and initial diameters, a non-significant increase in diameter, in the cervical implant region, after torque on the abutment, was observed. The torque applied to the abutments did not produce deformations in the cervical area of Morse taper implants.

CONCLUSIONS

The torque applied to the abutment screw in implants with a Morse taper connection does not cause deformation in the cervical area of the implant body in implant with 11.5° and 16.0° conicity angles.

摘要

背景

基台固位后直径稳定性的改变可能会导致施加扭矩的降低或影响种植体周围组织,从而损害治疗的长期效果。因此,本研究旨在探讨种植体-基台界面处不同的连接角度(11.5°和16.0°)在制造商推荐扭矩下如何影响种植体直径稳定性。

方法

将80个莫氏锥度型种植体标本分为两组,具有不同的内锥度角:11.5°(n = 40)和16.0°(n = 40)。种植体直径(mm)分别为:3.55、3.8、4.5和5.0。对种植体的外径进行初始测量。在这些测量之后,所有种植体进行基台安装,并对种植体外径进行最终测量。

结果

考虑最终直径与初始直径之间的对比分析,观察到在基台施加扭矩后,种植体颈部区域的直径有不显著的增加。施加在基台上的扭矩未在莫氏锥度种植体的颈部区域产生变形。

结论

对于锥度角为11.5°和16.0°的具有莫氏锥度连接的种植体,施加在基台螺钉上的扭矩不会在种植体主体的颈部区域引起变形。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad3/12299079/ba399fc0754a/materials-18-03403-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad3/12299079/2aff4b7d16c3/materials-18-03403-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad3/12299079/64b1cc882707/materials-18-03403-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad3/12299079/b29667146db7/materials-18-03403-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad3/12299079/ba399fc0754a/materials-18-03403-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad3/12299079/2aff4b7d16c3/materials-18-03403-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad3/12299079/64b1cc882707/materials-18-03403-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad3/12299079/b29667146db7/materials-18-03403-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dad3/12299079/ba399fc0754a/materials-18-03403-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of Diameter Stability in Morse Taper Dental Implants with Different Angulations After Abutment Connection.基台连接后不同角度莫氏锥度牙种植体直径稳定性的评估。
Materials (Basel). 2025 Jul 21;18(14):3403. doi: 10.3390/ma18143403.
2
Biomechanical Analysis of Various Connector Designs of Dental Implant Complex: A Numerical Finite Element Study.牙种植复合体不同连接设计的生物力学分析:一项数值有限元研究。
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun 26;75(4):100873. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100873.
3
The influence of prosthetic designs on peri-implant bone loss: An AO/AAP systematic review and meta-analysis.修复体设计对种植体周围骨吸收的影响:一项AO/AAP系统评价与Meta分析
J Periodontol. 2025 Jun;96(6):634-651. doi: 10.1002/JPER.24-0144. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
4
Comparative Study on the Effect of Various Implant-Abutment Connections on Microbial Leakage.不同种植体-基台连接方式对微生物渗漏影响的比较研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1307-S1309. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1928_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
5
Effect of Thermodynamic Cyclic Loading on Screw Loosening of Tightened Versus New Abutment Screw in Bone Level and Tissue Level Implants in DIO Implant Company (In-Vitro Study).热力学循环加载对DIO种植体公司骨水平和软组织水平种植体中拧紧的与新的基台螺钉松动的影响(体外研究)
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70162. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70162.
6
The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体-基台连接对种植体周围骨丧失的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Aug;20(4):653-664. doi: 10.1111/cid.12620. Epub 2018 May 15.
7
Performance of conical abutment (Morse Taper) connection implants: a systematic review.锥形基台(莫尔斯锥度)连接种植体的性能:系统评价。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014 Feb;102(2):552-74. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34709. Epub 2013 May 9.
8
A 6-Year Randomized Controlled Trial on Different Implant Designs in Maxillary Overdenture Patients.一项针对上颌覆盖义齿患者不同种植体设计的6年随机对照试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70069. doi: 10.1111/cid.70069.
9
Micro-CT Evaluation of Screw Deformation After Quasi-Static Loading of Titanium-Base and Multi-Unit Abutments at Different Implant Angulations.不同种植体角度下钛基和多单位基台准静态加载后螺钉变形的显微CT评估
Int J Dent. 2025 Jun 13;2025:2519930. doi: 10.1155/ijod/2519930. eCollection 2025.
10
Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review.基台/修复体的内连接与外连接:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:202-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02556.x.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of different implant-abutment types and heights on screw loosening in cases with increased crown height space.不同种植体-基台类型和高度对增加冠高度空间病例中螺钉松动的影响。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Jun;10(3):e894. doi: 10.1002/cre2.894.
2
The mechanical and clinical influences of prosthetic index structure in Morse taper implant-abutment connection: a scoping review.莫氏锥度种植体-基台连接中修复指数结构的力学和临床影响:一项范围综述
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 21;23(1):775. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03545-3.
3
The Mechanical Behavior of a Screwless Morse Taper Implant-Abutment Connection: An In Vitro Study.
无螺钉莫氏锥度种植体-基台连接的力学行为:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2022 May 8;15(9):3381. doi: 10.3390/ma15093381.
4
Comparison of the Morse Cone Connection with the Internal Hexagon and External Hexagon Connections Based on Microleakage - Review.基于微渗漏的莫氏锥度连接与内六角和外六角连接的比较——综述
Prague Med Rep. 2021;122(3):181-190. doi: 10.14712/23362936.2021.15.
5
Vertical Discrepancy in Height of Morse Cone Abutments Submitted to Different Torque Forces.承受不同扭矩力的莫氏锥度基台高度的垂直差异。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Aug 30;14(17):4950. doi: 10.3390/ma14174950.
6
Review of the Mechanical Behavior of Different Implant-Abutment Connections.不同种植体-基台连接的机械行为研究综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 23;17(22):8685. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228685.
7
Mechanism of and factors associated with the loosening of the implant abutment screw: A review.种植体基台螺钉松动的机制及相关因素:综述。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Jul;31(4):338-345. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12494. Epub 2019 May 31.
8
In vitro assessment of connection strength and stability of internal implant-abutment connections.种植体内种植体-基台连接的连接强度和稳定性的体外评估。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 May;65:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
9
Effects of Taper Angle and Sealant Agents on Bacterial Leakage Along the Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study Under Loaded Conditions.锥角和封闭剂对种植体-基台界面细菌渗漏的影响:负载条件下的体外研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 September/October;33(5):1071–1077. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6257. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
10
Microleakage at the Different Implant Abutment Interface: A Systematic Review.不同种植体基台界面的微渗漏:一项系统评价
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):ZE10-ZE15. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28951.10054. Epub 2017 Jun 1.