• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Study on the Effect of Various Implant-Abutment Connections on Microbial Leakage.不同种植体-基台连接方式对微生物渗漏影响的比较研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1307-S1309. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1928_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Biomechanical Analysis of Various Connector Designs of Dental Implant Complex: A Numerical Finite Element Study.牙种植复合体不同连接设计的生物力学分析:一项数值有限元研究。
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun 26;75(4):100873. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100873.
3
A 6-Year Randomized Controlled Trial on Different Implant Designs in Maxillary Overdenture Patients.一项针对上颌覆盖义齿患者不同种植体设计的6年随机对照试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Jun;27(3):e70069. doi: 10.1111/cid.70069.
4
Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review.从机械、生物和美学角度来看,内部连接是否比外部连接更高效?一项系统综述。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Sep;19(3):229-42. doi: 10.1007/s10006-015-0494-5. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
5
The effect of 3D printing technology combined with Morse taper and platform switching design on microleakage performance of dental implants.3D打印技术结合莫氏锥度与平台转换设计对牙种植体微渗漏性能的影响
Odontology. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s10266-025-01152-y.
6
Performance of conical abutment (Morse Taper) connection implants: a systematic review.锥形基台(莫尔斯锥度)连接种植体的性能:系统评价。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014 Feb;102(2):552-74. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34709. Epub 2013 May 9.
7
Internal vs. external connections for abutments/reconstructions: a systematic review.基台/修复体的内连接与外连接:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:202-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02556.x.
8
Comparison of external, internal flat-to-flat, and conical implant abutment connections for implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.种植体支持修复体的外部、内部平面到平面以及锥形种植体基台连接的比较:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Sep;130(3):327-340. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.029. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
9
Implant-supported crowns with locking taper implant-abutment connection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.带锁锥形种植体-基台连接的种植体支持的牙冠:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Aug;132(2):369-380. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
Effectiveness of sinus lift procedures for dental implant rehabilitation: a Cochrane systematic review.上颌窦提升术用于牙种植修复的有效性:一项Cochrane系统评价
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Spring;3(1):7-26.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Implant-Abutment Connection on Clinical Outcomes and Microbial Colonization: A Narrative Review.种植体-基台连接对临床结果和微生物定植的影响:一项叙述性综述。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 3;13(5):1131. doi: 10.3390/ma13051131.
2
The role of implant-abutment connection in preventing bacterial leakage: a review.种植体-基台连接在防止细菌渗漏中的作用:综述。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019 May-Jun;33(3 Suppl. 1):129-134. DENTAL SUPPLEMENT.
3
The micromechanical behavior of implant-abutment connections under a dynamic load protocol.种植体-基台连接在动态负载方案下的微观力学行为。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Oct;20(5):814-823. doi: 10.1111/cid.12651. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
4
The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.种植体-基台连接对种植体周围骨丧失的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Aug;20(4):653-664. doi: 10.1111/cid.12620. Epub 2018 May 15.
5
Prevalence and Mechanisms of Peri-implant Diseases.种植体周围病的流行情况及发病机制。
J Dent Res. 2017 Jan;96(1):31-37. doi: 10.1177/0022034516667484. Epub 2016 Oct 1.
6
Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface using an in vitro dynamic loading model.采用体外动态加载模型研究种植体-基台界面的细菌定植。
J Periodontol. 2011 Apr;82(4):613-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100415. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
7
Implants and components: entering the new millennium.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Jan-Feb;15(1):76-94.
8
Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 Jul-Aug;12(4):527-40.
9
The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature.表面粗糙度和表面自由能对人体龈上和龈下菌斑形成的影响。文献综述。
J Clin Periodontol. 1995 Jan;22(1):1-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1995.tb01765.x.

不同种植体-基台连接方式对微生物渗漏影响的比较研究

Comparative Study on the Effect of Various Implant-Abutment Connections on Microbial Leakage.

作者信息

Acharya Aditya, Sahai Richa, Ravindra K Anusha, Mishra Shivani, Uikey Guruprasad, Electricwala Mustansir M

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, KAHER's KLE VK Institute of Dental Sciences, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.

Department of Prosthodontics, Ranjeet Deshmukh Dental College and Research Centre, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1307-S1309. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1928_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.

DOI:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1928_24
PMID:40655641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12244627/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Microbial leakage at the implant-abutment interface can lead to peri-implantitis, jeopardizing the long-term success of dental implants. The design and type of implant-abutment connection play a significant role in minimizing this leakage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty dental implants were divided into three groups (n = 10): group I - internal hex connection, group II - external hex connection, and group III - Morse taper connection. Each implant was inoculated with bacteria and assembled under standardized torque. The assemblies were incubated for 7 days at 37°C. Microbial leakage was assessed by culturing samples from the external surfaces of each implant system on MacConkey agar. The bacterial growth was quantified by colony-forming units (CFU) analysis.

RESULTS

The microbial leakage was significantly different among the three groups ( < 0.05). Group II (external hex) exhibited the highest microbial leakage with an average CFU of 1.25 × 10 followed by group I (internal hex) with 6.5 × 10 CFU. Group III (Morse taper) demonstrated the least microbial leakage, with an average CFU of 1.8 × 10 The Morse taper connection showed superior sealing ability compared to the other two connections.

CONCLUSION

The type of implant-abutment connection significantly affects microbial leakage. Morse taper connections exhibit the least leakage and may be preferred to improve the long-term success of dental implants. Further clinical studies are required to corroborate these findings.

摘要

背景

种植体-基台界面处的微生物渗漏可导致种植体周围炎,危及牙种植体的长期成功。种植体-基台连接的设计和类型在最小化这种渗漏方面起着重要作用。

材料与方法

30颗牙种植体分为三组(n = 10):第一组——内六角连接,第二组——外六角连接,第三组——莫氏锥度连接。每颗种植体接种细菌并在标准扭矩下组装。将组件在37°C下孵育7天。通过在麦康凯琼脂上培养每个种植体系统外表面的样本评估微生物渗漏。通过菌落形成单位(CFU)分析对细菌生长进行定量。

结果

三组之间的微生物渗漏有显著差异(<0.05)。第二组(外六角)的微生物渗漏最高,平均CFU为1.25×10,其次是第一组(内六角),为6.5×10 CFU。第三组(莫氏锥度)的微生物渗漏最少,平均CFU为1.8×10。与其他两种连接相比,莫氏锥度连接显示出更好的密封能力。

结论

种植体-基台连接的类型显著影响微生物渗漏。莫氏锥度连接的渗漏最少,可能更有利于提高牙种植体的长期成功率。需要进一步的临床研究来证实这些发现。