Abbott M A, Samuel J R, Webb D R
Anaesthesia. 1985 Nov;40(11):1065-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb10603.x.
The anaesthetic considerations of patients presenting for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy are described. Regional anaesthesia with sedation may be preferable to general anaesthesia for patients undergoing this form of therapy. If regional anaesthesia is contra-indicated, general anaesthesia using controlled ventilation with muscle relaxation, supplemented with a narcotic and a low concentration of volatile anaesthetic has been found to be a suitable alternative. The additional epidural preparation time has to be balanced against the benefits of easier patient transfer, especially during multi-stage procedures, and better postoperative analgesia. The epidural catheter can be left in situ in patients who require multiple treatments or who may experience severe ureteric pain as the resulting 'sand mass' is passed. Epidural space localisation using a 'loss of resistance to saline' technique is recommended, in order to avoid the possible risk of damage to the spinal cord and emerging nerves (due to the presence of an air-water interface). Patients with cardiac insufficiency need special consideration, in view of the effects of immersion on right and left heart filling pressures.
本文描述了接受体外冲击波碎石术患者的麻醉注意事项。对于接受这种治疗方式的患者,区域麻醉联合镇静可能比全身麻醉更可取。如果区域麻醉有禁忌,使用控制通气并辅以肌肉松弛的全身麻醉,再补充麻醉性镇痛药和低浓度挥发性麻醉剂已被证明是一种合适的替代方法。额外的硬膜外准备时间必须与更便于患者转运(尤其是在多阶段手术期间)以及更好的术后镇痛效果相权衡。对于需要多次治疗或可能因排出“沙团”而经历严重输尿管疼痛的患者,硬膜外导管可以留在原位。建议采用“盐水阻力消失”技术进行硬膜外间隙定位,以避免对脊髓和出神经造成损伤的潜在风险(由于存在气 - 水界面)。鉴于浸入对左右心充盈压的影响,心功能不全的患者需要特别考虑。