Auerbach Nadja, Liu Vivian N, Huang David Roy, Clift Ashley Kieran, Al-Ammouri Mahmoud, El-Osta Austen
Menwell Ltd, London, UK.
Self-Care Academic Research Unit (SCARU), Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, UK.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Jul 22;3(2):e002519. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-002519. eCollection 2025.
Obesity is a critical public health challenge globally. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have demonstrated significant efficacy in weight loss; however, their adoption is influenced by various individual and societal factors. This study sought to examine awareness, motivations and barriers to adoption of GLP-1RAs in the UK, with a focus on demographic differences.
A cross-sectional survey of 1297 UK adults was conducted using an electronic questionnaire distributed via social media, online platforms and personal networks. The survey assessed demographic characteristics, awareness, perceptions and use of GLP-1RAs. Data were analysed using χ2 and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The primary analysis method was ordinal logistic regression, with multinomial logistic regression used to estimate the relative risk ratio (RRR) if the proportional odds assumption was violated. A p-value<0.05 was considered significant.
Significantly higher awareness of GLP-1RAs was observed among those attempting weight loss in the past year (85.7% vs 14.3%, p<0.001). Women were more likely to report both awareness (87.2% vs 68.2%, p<0.001) and excellent understanding (20.0% vs 7.5%, p<0.001). Main information sources included news (60.1%) and social media (50.3%). Only 9.0% first learnt about GLP-1RAs from healthcare providers. Past and current users were less likely than non-users to express scepticism about safety and efficacy and 6.91 times more likely to strongly disagree (compared with being neutral) that 'risks outweigh the benefits' (RRR, 6.91; 95% CI, 4.32 to 11.05; p<0.001) and 7.33 times more likely to strongly disagree (relative to being neutral) that 'there is not enough evidence to suggest GLP-1RAs are safe' (RRR, 7.33; 95% CI, 4.05 to 13.27; p<0.001). 91.0% of current or past users indicated they would recommend GLP-1RAs to a friend struggling with weight management.
Concerns about safety, cost and potential side effects remain significant barriers to GLP-1RA adoption. Current or past users strongly disagree with statements of scepticism; however, scepticism among non-users highlights the need for improved public education around safety and efficacy.
肥胖是全球一项严峻的公共卫生挑战。胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)已在减肥方面显示出显著疗效;然而,其应用受到各种个人和社会因素的影响。本研究旨在调查英国GLP-1RAs的知晓情况、使用动机和应用障碍,重点关注人口统计学差异。
通过社交媒体、在线平台和个人网络分发电子问卷,对1297名英国成年人进行了横断面调查。该调查评估了人口统计学特征、对GLP-1RAs的知晓情况、认知和使用情况。使用卡方检验和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验分析数据。主要分析方法是有序逻辑回归,如果比例优势假设被违反,则使用多项逻辑回归来估计相对风险比(RRR)。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
在过去一年中尝试减肥的人群中,对GLP-1RAs的知晓率显著更高(85.7%对14.3%,p<0.001)。女性更有可能报告知晓情况(87.2%对68.2%,p<0.001)和良好的理解(20.0%对7.5%,p<0.001)。主要信息来源包括新闻(60.1%)和社交媒体(50.3%)。只有9.0%的人最初是从医疗保健提供者那里了解到GLP-1RAs的。过去和现在的使用者比非使用者更不可能对安全性和疗效表示怀疑,并且强烈不同意“风险大于益处”(与持中立态度相比)的可能性高6.91倍(RRR,6.91;95%CI,4.32至11.05;p<0.001),强烈不同意“没有足够证据表明GLP-1RAs是安全的”(相对于持中立态度)的可能性高7.33倍(RRR,7.33;95%CI,4.05至13.27;p<0.001)。91.0%的当前或过去使用者表示他们会向正在努力控制体重的朋友推荐GLP-1RAs。
对安全性、成本和潜在副作用的担忧仍然是采用GLP-1RAs的重大障碍。当前或过去的使用者强烈不同意怀疑性的陈述;然而,非使用者中的怀疑态度凸显了围绕安全性和疗效加强公众教育的必要性。