Salivary Biomarkers of Inflammation in Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain.

BACKGROUND

Chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is a debilitating condition with unclear underlying mechanisms. The presence of systemic biomarkers associated with inflammation in nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) has been inconsistently reported primarily through invasive blood sampling.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the use of saliva as an alternative medium for assessing inflammatory biomarker levels in patients with CNSLBP.

DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional pilot study.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with CNSLBP and 25 age and sex matched asymptomatic participants were selected according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary outcome was determination of the levels of inflammatory biomarkers in unstimulated saliva samples of CNSLBP patients relative to controls using Luminex™ 200 technology. Secondary outcomes were pain, disability and anxiety/stress levels of participants.

RESULTS

In CNSLBP patients, 9 biomarkers interferon γ (IFNγ), interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, IL-12p40, IL-12p70, and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) were comparable to controls ( = .25-.94). However, 4 pro-inflammatory mediators were significantly elevated, exhibiting medium to large effect sizes: IL-1β ( = .028, Cohen's  = 1.62), IL-6 ( = .001,  = 1.0), IL-8 ( = .002,  = 0.86), and MCP-1 ( = .001,  = 0.77). Additionally, IL-1Ra levels were significantly higher, though with a small effect size ( = .03,  = 0.43). A significant correlation ( = .02) was observed between VAS pain scores and MCP-1 levels.

CONCLUSION

Saliva represents a viable medium for assessing key inflammatory biomarkers in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP). Elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and the nociceptive chemokine MCP-1 were observed in comparison to asymptomatic controls, with MCP-1 showing a positive correlation with self-reported pain intensity. Future studies utilizing unstimulated saliva samples may further investigate changes in inflammatory biomarker levels to monitor treatment outcomes.