Suppr超能文献

成人慢性哮喘患者使用胆茶碱与缓释茶碱的比较研究。

A comparative study of the use of choline theophyllinate and a sustained-release theophylline in adults with chronic asthma.

作者信息

Chan K W, Lee H S, Ti T Y, Tan T H, Feng P H

出版信息

Ann Acad Med Singap. 1985 Jul;14(3):470-4.

PMID:4073814
Abstract

We studied 16 adults with chronic bronchial asthma by measuring the plasma theophylline concentrations and evaluating clinically the control of asthma following oral administration of choline theophyllinate (CT) and a sustained-release theophylline preparation (SRT). All 16 patients were studied in 3 one-weekly phases. These patients received CT 200 mg t.i.d. during the 1st week, no theophylline during the 2nd week and SRT 250 mg 12-hourly during the 3rd week. All other anti-asthmatic medications were maintained during the study. After the night dose of a theophylline preparation, the mean plasma trough concentration the next morning was significantly higher for SRT (9.4 mcg/ml +/- SEM 1.0) than for CT (3.6 mcg/ml +/- SEM 0.6). The mean plasma peak concentration after the morning dose was also significantly higher for SRT (11.5 mcg/ml +/- SEM 1.0) than for CT (7.4 mcg/ml +/- SEM 1.0), The mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) obtained during SRT treatment was significantly higher than during CT treatment. There was no significant difference between FEV1 measured at trough concentrations during CT treatment and during the period without theophylline. The patients had fewer symptoms of asthma and fewer side-effects from theophylline during the week they received SRT compared with the week they received CT. In this study, using the conventional dosage schedule as practised in Singapore, SRT has distinct advantages over CT in the treatment of chronic asthma.

摘要

我们通过测量血浆茶碱浓度,并对口服胆茶碱(CT)和缓释茶碱制剂(SRT)后哮喘的控制情况进行临床评估,对16名成年慢性支气管哮喘患者进行了研究。所有16名患者分三个为期一周的阶段进行研究。这些患者在第1周接受CT 200毫克,每日三次;第2周不服用茶碱;第3周接受SRT 250毫克,每12小时一次。在研究期间,所有其他抗哮喘药物均维持使用。在服用一次茶碱制剂的夜间剂量后,第二天早晨SRT的平均血浆谷浓度(9.4微克/毫升±标准误1.0)显著高于CT(3.6微克/毫升±标准误0.6)。早晨服药后的平均血浆峰浓度SRT(11.5微克/毫升±标准误1.0)也显著高于CT(7.4微克/毫升±标准误1.0)。SRT治疗期间获得的平均一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)显著高于CT治疗期间。CT治疗期间谷浓度时测得的FEV1与未服用茶碱期间测得的FEV1之间无显著差异。与接受CT的那一周相比,患者在接受SRT的那一周哮喘症状较少,茶碱的副作用也较少。在本研究中,按照新加坡的常规给药方案,SRT在治疗慢性哮喘方面比CT具有明显优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验