Remer Hallie B, Brockman Bryan S, Osondu Chukwuemeka U, Mosher Hannah, Hernandez Yvette, Paraliticci Giovanni, Lawrie Charles M, Suarez Juan C
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jul 24;34:101776. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101776. eCollection 2025 Aug.
While neutral mechanical alignment has been the gold standard for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), constitutional knee alignment is commonly nonneutral and varies widely among individuals. We aimed to determine if a bounded functional alignment strategy in robotic assisted TKA restored constitutional alignment and if this restoration resulted in superior patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent robotic TKA with a bounded functional alignment strategy at a single institution. Final intraoperative knee alignment was compared to calculated constitutional alignment, which was unknown to the surgeons during the procedure. PROs (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) with a 1-year follow-up were compared between patients with a final knee alignment within 2° of constitutional alignment compared with those >2° from calculated constitutional alignment. Mean changes in PROs were analyzed, and proportions achieving minimally clinical important difference between groups was determined.
Of the 188 knees included, 52% (n = 98) were balanced within 2° of constitutional alignment. Despite significant differences in alignment changes between groups (2.0° vs 4.5°), no significant differences were observed in PRO measures. Mean Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement improvement (25.0 vs 29.5), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Health (8.0 vs 7.7), and Mental Health (2.7 vs 1.2) scores were comparable. Similar proportions in both groups achieved minimally clinical important difference across all measures.
While robotic bounded functional strategy restored constitutional alignment in half of cases, this did not result in superior PROs at 1 year. Achieving soft tissue balance within acceptable parameters of alignment and bony excision may be more important than precise restoration of prearthritic alignment.
虽然中立位机械对线一直是全膝关节置换术(TKA)的金标准,但个体的固有膝关节对线通常并非中立位,且个体差异很大。我们旨在确定机器人辅助TKA中的受限功能对线策略是否能恢复固有对线,以及这种恢复是否能带来更好的患者报告结局(PROs)。
我们回顾性分析了在单一机构接受采用受限功能对线策略的机器人TKA的患者。将最终术中膝关节对线与计算得出的固有对线进行比较,术中外科医生并不知晓固有对线情况。对最终膝关节对线与计算得出的固有对线相差在2°以内的患者和相差超过2°的患者进行1年随访后的PROs(膝关节损伤与骨关节炎关节置换结局评分以及患者报告结局测量信息系统)比较。分析PROs的平均变化,并确定两组中达到最小临床重要差异的比例。
在纳入的188个膝关节中,52%(n = 98)在固有对线的2°范围内达到平衡。尽管两组之间的对线变化存在显著差异(2.0°对4.5°),但在PRO测量中未观察到显著差异。膝关节损伤与骨关节炎关节置换结局评分的平均改善(25.0对29.5)、患者报告结局测量信息系统的身体健康评分(8.0对7.7)和心理健康评分(2.7对1.2)相当。两组中在所有测量指标上达到最小临床重要差异的比例相似。
虽然机器人受限功能策略在半数病例中恢复了固有对线,但在1年时并未带来更好的PROs。在可接受的对线和骨切除参数范围内实现软组织平衡可能比精确恢复关节炎前的对线更为重要。