Nettles V F, Wood J M, Webster R G
Avian Dis. 1985 Jul-Sep;29(3):733-41.
Wildlife surveillance was conducted for influenza viruses in conjunction with the 1983-84 lethal H5N2 avian influenza epizootic in domestic poultry in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, and Virginia. Virus-isolation attempts made on cloacal and tracheal swabs from 4,466 birds and small rodents within the quarantined areas and 1,511 waterfowl in nearby Maryland yielded only a single H5N2 isolate from a pen-raised chukar in Pennsylvania. Antibodies against hemagglutinin type 5 and/or neuraminidase type 2 were found in 33% of the aquatic birds tested; however, this finding could not be used to confirm previous H5N2 avian influenza virus activity because of the possibility of prior infections with multiple influenza subtypes. The low prevalence of lethal H5N2 avian influenza virus in wild birds and small rodents strongly indicated that these animals were not responsible for dissemination of the disease among poultry farms during the outbreak.
1983 - 1984年,宾夕法尼亚州、新泽西州、马里兰州和弗吉尼亚州的家禽中爆发了致命的H5N2禽流感疫情,期间对野生动物进行了流感病毒监测。对隔离区内4466只鸟类和小型啮齿动物的泄殖腔和气管拭子以及马里兰州附近的1511只水禽进行病毒分离尝试,仅从宾夕法尼亚州一只圈养的石鸡中分离出一株H5N2病毒。在33%的受试水鸟中发现了针对5型血凝素和/或2型神经氨酸酶的抗体;然而,由于先前可能感染过多种流感亚型,这一发现不能用于证实之前的H5N2禽流感病毒活动。野生鸟类和小型啮齿动物中致命H5N2禽流感病毒的低流行率强烈表明,在疫情爆发期间,这些动物并非该疾病在家禽养殖场之间传播的原因。