Mieran Taren, Hill Andrew, Horswill Mark S, Summers Mathew J, Stefanidis Kayla B
MAIC/UniSC Road Safety Research Collaboration, University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy Downs, Queensland, 4556, Australia.
Minerals Industry Safety and Health Centre, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1007/s00213-025-06869-w.
Medicinal cannabis use is increasing worldwide, yet its impacts on driving safety in frequent users are not clearly understood. A more comprehensive understanding of the effects of THC on driving behaviour in frequent users is needed to guide drug driving policy and evidence-based advice for medicinal cannabis consumers. This study investigated the acute effects of orally ingested THC oil on medicinal cannabis users': (a) hazard perception skill performance; (b) driving-related risk-taking behaviours (speeding propensity, following distance, gap acceptance); (c) self-perceived hazard perception skill performance; and (d) self-perceptions of driving skills and safety. A within-subjects design was used to compare scores on validated video-based measures of hazard perception skill and risk-taking behaviours, along with self-report measures, between baseline (no THC) and post-consumption. Although participants' (N = 41) actual hazard perception skill performance did not significantly decline from baseline to post-consumption, their perceived performance did (with no significant correlation between the two in either condition). In the other video-based measures, participants selected significantly slower speeds and longer following distances post-consumption (but gap acceptance behaviour was unchanged). There was no significant change in self-perceptions of driving skills and safety after correction for multiple tests. While there was no evidence that oral ingestion of THC oils by medicinal cannabis users impacted hazard perception skill performance, they were unable to accurately self-assess their performance, regardless of whether they had consumed THC. Further, medicinal cannabis patients engage in compensatory strategies, specifically by reducing their speed and increasing their following distance following the consumption of THC.
医用大麻在全球的使用正在增加,但其对频繁使用者驾驶安全的影响尚不清楚。需要更全面地了解四氢大麻酚(THC)对频繁使用者驾驶行为的影响,以指导药物驾驶政策,并为医用大麻消费者提供循证建议。本研究调查了口服THC油对医用大麻使用者的以下影响:(a)危险感知技能表现;(b)与驾驶相关的冒险行为(超速倾向、跟车距离、间隙接受度);(c)自我感知的危险感知技能表现;以及(d)对驾驶技能和安全性的自我认知。采用受试者内设计,比较在基线(未服用THC)和服用后,基于视频的有效危险感知技能和冒险行为测量指标的得分,以及自我报告指标。尽管参与者(N = 41)的实际危险感知技能表现从基线到服用后没有显著下降,但其感知表现却有下降(在两种情况下两者均无显著相关性)。在其他基于视频的测量指标中,参与者在服用后选择的速度显著更慢,跟车距离更长(但间隙接受行为未变)。在进行多重检验校正后,驾驶技能和安全性的自我认知没有显著变化。虽然没有证据表明医用大麻使用者口服THC油会影响危险感知技能表现,但无论是否服用了THC,他们都无法准确自我评估其表现。此外,医用大麻患者会采取补偿策略,特别是在服用THC后通过降低速度和增加跟车距离来实现。