• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

七个国家经济困难家庭压力模型的纵向研究。

A Longitudinal Examination of the Family Stress Model of Economic Hardship in Seven Countries.

作者信息

Zietz Susannah, Lansford Jennifer E, Liu Qin, Long Qian, Oburu Paul, Pastorelli Concetta, Sorbring Emma, Skinner Ann T, Steinberg Laurence, Tapanya Sombat, Tirado Liliana Maria Uribe, Yotanyamaneewong Saengduean, Alampay Liane Peña, Al-Hassan Suha M, Bacchini Dario, Bornstein Marc H, Chang Lei, Deater-Deckard Kirby, Di Giunta Laura, Dodge Kenneth A, Gurdal Sevtap

机构信息

Duke University, USA.

Chongqing Medical University, China.

出版信息

Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022 Dec;143. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106661. Epub 2022 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106661
PMID:36339096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9631805/
Abstract

The Family Stress Model of Economic Hardship (FSM) posits that economic situations create differences in psychosocial outcomes for parents and developmental outcomes for their adolescent children. However, prior studies guided by the FSM have been mostly in high-income countries and have included only mother report or have not disaggregated mother and father report. Our focal research questions were whether the indirect effect of economic hardship on adolescent mental health was mediated by economic pressure, parental depression, dysfunctional dyadic coping, and parenting, and whether these relations differed by culture and mother versus father report. We conducted multiple group serial mediation path models using longitudinal data from adolescents ages 12-15 in 2008-2012 from 1,082 families in 10 cultural groups in seven countries (Colombia, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, the Philippines, Thailand, and the United States). Taken together, the indirect effect findings suggest partial support for the FSM in most cultural groups across study countries. We found associations among economic hardship, parental depression, parenting, and adolescent internalizing and externalizing. Findings support polices and interventions aimed at disrupting each path in the model to mitigate the effects of economic hardship on parental depression, harsh parenting, and adolescents' externalizing and internalizing problems.

摘要

经济困难家庭压力模型(FSM)认为,经济状况会导致父母心理社会结果以及其青春期子女发展结果的差异。然而,此前受FSM指导的研究大多在高收入国家进行,且仅纳入了母亲的报告,或者未区分母亲和父亲的报告。我们的核心研究问题是,经济困难对青少年心理健康的间接影响是否通过经济压力、父母抑郁、功能失调的二元应对方式和养育方式来介导,以及这些关系在不同文化以及母亲与父亲的报告中是否存在差异。我们使用了来自2008年至2012年期间7个国家(哥伦比亚、意大利、约旦、肯尼亚、菲律宾、泰国和美国)10个文化群体中1082个家庭的12至15岁青少年的纵向数据,构建了多组序列中介路径模型。综合来看,间接效应的研究结果表明,在研究的大多数文化群体中,FSM得到了部分支持。我们发现经济困难、父母抑郁、养育方式与青少年内化和外化问题之间存在关联。研究结果支持旨在打破模型中每条路径以减轻经济困难对父母抑郁、严厉养育方式以及青少年外化和内化问题影响的政策和干预措施。

相似文献

1
A Longitudinal Examination of the Family Stress Model of Economic Hardship in Seven Countries.七个国家经济困难家庭压力模型的纵向研究。
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022 Dec;143. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2022.106661. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
2
Examining effects of mother and father warmth and control on child externalizing and internalizing problems from age 8 to 13 in nine countries.考察 8 岁至 13 岁儿童的母亲和父亲温暖与控制对其外化和内化问题的影响,涉及 9 个国家。
Dev Psychopathol. 2020 Aug;32(3):1113-1137. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419001214.
3
Cross-Cultural Examination of Links between Parent-Adolescent Communication and Adolescent Psychological Problems in 12 Cultural Groups.跨文化研究 12 个文化群体中父母与青少年沟通和青少年心理问题之间的关系
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Jun;49(6):1225-1244. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01212-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
4
Bidirectional Relations Between Parenting and Behavior Problems From Age 8 to 13 in Nine Countries.九国研究显示:8 岁至 13 岁儿童的教养方式与行为问题存在双向关系。
J Res Adolesc. 2018 Sep;28(3):571-590. doi: 10.1111/jora.12381.
5
Parenting, culture, and the development of externalizing behaviors from age 7 to 14 in nine countries.养育方式、文化与九个国家 7 至 14 岁儿童外化行为的发展。
Dev Psychopathol. 2018 Dec;30(5):1937-1958. doi: 10.1017/S0954579418000925. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
6
Household Income Predicts Trajectories of Child Internalizing and Externalizing Behavior in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries.家庭收入预测高、中、低收入国家儿童内化和外化行为的发展轨迹。
Int J Behav Dev. 2019 Jan;43(1):74-79. doi: 10.1177/0165025418783272. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
7
A longitudinal examination of the Adaptation to Poverty-Related Stress Model: predicting child and adolescent adjustment over time.纵向考察贫困相关压力适应模型:预测儿童和青少年随时间的调整。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(5):713-25. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2012.755926. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
8
Longitudinal associations between mothers' and fathers' anger/irritability expressiveness, harsh parenting, and adolescents' socioemotional functioning in nine countries.九个国家中母亲和父亲的愤怒/易怒表达、严厉育儿与青少年社会情感功能的纵向关联。
Dev Psychol. 2020 Mar;56(3):458-474. doi: 10.1037/dev0000849.
9
Perceived mother and father acceptance-rejection predict four unique aspects of child adjustment across nine countries.在九个国家中,父母的接纳与拒绝认知可预测孩子适应能力的四个独特方面。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;56(8):923-32. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12366. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
10
Longitudinal impact of parents' discrimination experiences on children's internalizing and externalizing symptoms: A 2-year study of families of autistic children.父母的歧视经历对儿童内化和外化症状的纵向影响:一项针对自闭症儿童家庭的两年研究。
Autism. 2023 Feb;27(2):296-308. doi: 10.1177/13623613221093110. Epub 2022 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The family stress model during the coronavirus-19 pandemic: Identifying parental resilience factors.新冠疫情期间的家庭压力模型:识别父母的复原力因素。
J Fam Psychol. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1037/fam0001387.
2
Association between perceived financial hardship and sleep duration among Korean adolescents.韩国青少年感知到的经济困难与睡眠时间之间的关联。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 28;15(1):27528. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12677-1.
3
Exploring associations of financial well-being with health behaviours and physical and mental health: a cross-sectional study among US adults.探索财务状况与健康行为以及身心健康之间的关联:一项针对美国成年人的横断面研究。
BMJ Public Health. 2024 May 16;2(1):e000720. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000720. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Associations Between Psychological Stress and the Risk of First Onset of Major Depression Disorder: Results from a Longitudinal Study in 6,985 Chinese First-Year Students.心理压力与重度抑郁症首次发病风险之间的关联:对6985名中国大一学生的纵向研究结果
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Oct 16;17:3585-3593. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S482482. eCollection 2024.
5
Could a Growth Mindset Attenuate the Link Between Family Socioeconomic Status and Depressive Symptoms? Evidence from Chinese Adolescents.成长型思维模式能否减弱家庭社会经济地位与抑郁症状之间的联系?来自中国青少年的证据。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024 Sep 24;17:3313-3326. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S462230. eCollection 2024.
6
Structural risks and family adjustment in midwestern Latine immigrant families: Extending the family stress model.中西部拉美裔移民家庭的结构风险和家庭调整:扩展家庭压力模型。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2024 Oct;30(4):815-828. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000668. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
7
Applying a family stress model to understand U.S. families' patterns of stress, media use, and child behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.应用家庭压力模型来理解美国家庭在新冠疫情期间的压力模式、媒体使用情况和儿童行为。
J Child Media. 2023;17(2):246-265. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2023.2187853. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
8
The Differential Impact of Parenting on Adolescent Externalizing Behaviors in the Context of Maternal Stress.父母教养方式在母亲应激背景下对青少年外化行为的差异影响。
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Jul;52(7):1459-1470. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01747-0. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Fathers and Families: Risk and Resilience. An Introduction.父亲与家庭:风险与复原力。引言
Advers Resil Sci. 2021;2(2):63-69. doi: 10.1007/s42844-021-00039-5. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
2
A global analysis of cultural tightness in non-industrial societies.非工业社会的文化紧张度的全球分析。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jul 8;287(1930):20201036. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1036. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
3
Trajectories of childhood adversity and the risk of depression in young adulthood: Results from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.童年逆境轨迹与青年期抑郁风险:阿冯纵向研究父母与子女的结果。
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Jul;36(7):596-606. doi: 10.1002/da.22887. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Household Income Predicts Trajectories of Child Internalizing and Externalizing Behavior in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries.家庭收入预测高、中、低收入国家儿童内化和外化行为的发展轨迹。
Int J Behav Dev. 2019 Jan;43(1):74-79. doi: 10.1177/0165025418783272. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
5
The Impact of Financial Hardship on Single Parents: An Exploration of the Journey From Social Distress to Seeking Help.经济困难对单亲父母的影响:从社会困境到寻求帮助的历程探索
J Fam Econ Issues. 2018;39(2):233-242. doi: 10.1007/s10834-017-9551-6. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
6
Stress and child development: a review of the Family Stress Model.压力与儿童发展:家庭压力模型综述
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Feb;13:85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 24.
7
The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action.发展心理学中持续存在的抽样偏差:行动呼吁。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Oct;162:31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 May 30.
8
Families in the context of macroeconomic crises: A systematic review.宏观经济危机背景下的家庭:一项系统综述。
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Sep;30(6):687-97. doi: 10.1037/fam0000230. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
9
What effect did the global financial crisis have upon youth wellbeing? Evidence from four Australian cohorts.全球金融危机对青年福祉有何影响?来自澳大利亚四个队列的证据。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Apr;52(4):640-51. doi: 10.1037/dev0000092. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
10
Understanding the impact of the economic crisis on child health: the case of Spain.了解经济危机对儿童健康的影响:以西班牙为例。
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Oct 14;14:95. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0236-1.