Chaoshang Sun, Chaoyang Shi, Zhiming Zhu, Haixiao Lin, Zhenhua Li, Feng Du, Zhengzheng Cao, Pengtao Lu, Lin Liu
Shanghai Datun Energy Resources Co., Ltd., Xuzhou, China.
Henan Mine Water Disaster Prevention and Control and Water Resources Utilization Engineering Technology Research Center, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, 454000, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 31;15(1):28029. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14068-y.
To master the overburden structure failure and fracture evolution law under multi-key stratum control during repeated mining in coal seams, this study takes the superimposed mining faces of 6 and 7 coal seams in Xinjiang mining area as the research background. Through comprehensive research methods including theoretical analysis, similarity simulation, numerical simulation, and field monitoring, it systematically reveals the evolution law of overburden fractures under repeated mining controlled by multiple key strata, and clarifies the crucial control effects of cumulative damage in the overburden and the superimposed effect of mining-induced stress fields on fracture morphology during repeated mining of close-distance coal seams. The research shows: (1) Based on key stratu theory, four key strata are identified above the working face, with the first sub-key stratum and the main key stratum located at 61.63 m and 174.63 m above the 7 coal seam, respectively. (2) Similarity simulation displays that after mining the upper 6coal seam, the overburden failure exhibited an approximately "trapezoidal" distribution, with a fracture zone height of 40.2 m (height-to-mining ratio of 13.4); the fracture zone height in the area unaffected by repeated mining above the 7 coal seam was 115 m (height-to-mining ratio of 12.8). Repeated mining intensifies cumulative damage in the overburden and superimposes mining-induced stress fields, leading to rapid fracture propagation. Ultimately, under the combined control of multiple key strata, the fracture zone and caving zone heights stabilizes at 139.68 m and 42.88 m, respectively. The overburden failure pattern evolves from the single "trapezoidal" structure of initial mining to a "double-trapezoidal" composite structure, with fracture evolution following the pattern of "slow expansion during initial disturbance-leap increase due to cumulative damage from repeated mining-gradual stabilization regulated by key strata". (3) Field monitoring using the double-end water plugging and borehole observation joint detection method measures the fracture zone height after 6 coal seam mining as 38 m (height-to-mining ratio of 13.6 based on a measured seam thickness of 2.8 m), and the fracture zone height in the exclusively mined area of the 7 coal seam as 100.33 m (height-to-mining ratio of 12.4 based on a measured seam thickness of 8.09 m). The predicted height-to-mining ratios under different coal thickness conditions show good agreement. The research results provide a theoretical basis for roof water hazard prevention and control and surface damage management in the Xinjiang mining area.
为掌握煤层重复开采过程中多关键层控制下覆岩结构破坏及裂隙演化规律,本研究以新疆矿区6、7煤层叠加开采工作面为研究背景。通过理论分析、相似模拟、数值模拟及现场监测等综合研究方法,系统揭示了多关键层控制下重复开采覆岩裂隙演化规律,阐明了近距离煤层重复开采过程中覆岩累积损伤及采动应力场叠加效应在裂隙形态上的关键控制作用。研究表明:(1)基于关键层理论,确定了工作面上覆4个关键层,其中第一亚关键层和主关键层分别位于7煤层上方61.63 m和174.63 m处。(2)相似模拟显示,开采上覆6煤层后,覆岩破坏呈近似“梯形”分布,裂隙带高度为40.2 m(采高比13.4);7煤层上方未受重复开采影响区域的裂隙带高度为115 m(采高比12.8)。重复开采加剧了覆岩累积损伤并叠加采动应力场,导致裂隙快速扩展。最终,在多关键层联合控制下,裂隙带和垮落带高度分别稳定在139.68 m和42.88 m。覆岩破坏形态从初次开采的单一“梯形”结构演变为“双梯形”复合结构,裂隙演化遵循“初次扰动缓慢扩展—重复开采累积损伤跳跃式增加—关键层调控逐渐稳定”的模式。(3)采用双端止水与钻孔观测联合探测方法进行现场监测,测得6煤层开采后裂隙带高度为38 m(基于实测煤层厚度2.8 m,采高比13.6),7煤层单独开采区域裂隙带高度为100.33 m(基于实测煤层厚度8.09 m,采高比12.4)。不同煤层厚度条件下预测的采高比吻合较好。研究成果为新疆矿区顶板水害防治及地表破坏治理提供了理论依据。