Broeder Christoph, Baumann Uwe
Klinik für HNO-Heilkunde, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt, Universitätsmedizin, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 14, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
HNO. 2025 Sep;73(9):650-660. doi: 10.1007/s00106-025-01646-9. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
Individual cognitive abilities are increasingly discussed as a potential factor influencing the outcomes of cochlear implant (CI) treatment. In this context, the present study investigated a possible correlation between the secondary and post-secondary education of a large cohort of CI recipients and their speech comprehension. Other variables with a potential influence on the treatment outcome included age at implantation, the duration of hearing loss, and the treatment mode.
The study included data of n = 326 patients from the audiology database of the Frankfurt University ENT Clinic. Secondary and post-secondary education histories were collected as part of the anamnesis using a questionnaire. Speech comprehension was assessed using the Freiburg monosyllabic test (FBE) and the Oldenburg sentence test in noise (OLSA) at 6 and 12 months after implantation and correlated with various biographical and audiological factors.
Patients with higher educational qualifications showed better outcomes in the FBE at 6 months (ANOVA; F (2, 104) = 5.60; p = 0.05) and at 12 months (F (2, 223) = 3.07; p = 0.05; η = 0.03) compared to those with vocational qualifications. In the speech comprehension in noise (OLSA), a significant group difference was observed 12 months postoperatively. Patients without qualifications or with other qualifications scored lower than those with vocational or higher qualifications (F (2, 74) = 4.41; p = 0.02; η = 0.11). Other significant factors influencing speech comprehension included the age at implantation and mode of care.
The correlation between secondary and post-secondary education and speech comprehension after CI treatment was not unequivocal. Only the choice of post-secondary education showed a significant correlation with speech comprehension. Further research is required to confirm a potential relationship.
个体认知能力作为影响人工耳蜗(CI)治疗效果的潜在因素,受到越来越多的讨论。在此背景下,本研究调查了一大群CI接受者的中等教育和高中后教育与其言语理解之间可能存在的相关性。其他可能影响治疗结果的变量包括植入时的年龄、听力损失持续时间和治疗方式。
该研究纳入了法兰克福大学耳鼻喉科诊所听力数据库中n = 326例患者的数据。使用问卷收集中等教育和高中后教育史作为问诊的一部分。在植入后6个月和12个月,使用弗莱堡单音节测试(FBE)和奥尔登堡噪声句子测试(OLSA)评估言语理解,并将其与各种个人经历和听力学因素相关联。
与具有职业资格的患者相比,具有较高学历的患者在6个月时的FBE测试中表现更好(方差分析;F(2, 104) = 5.60;p = 0.05),在12个月时也更好(F(2, 223) = 3.07;p = 0.05;η = 0.03)。在噪声中的言语理解(OLSA)方面,术后12个月观察到显著的组间差异。没有资格或具有其他资格的患者得分低于具有职业资格或更高学历的患者(F(2, 74) = 4.41;p = 0.02;η = 0.11)。其他影响言语理解的重要因素包括植入时的年龄和护理方式。
CI治疗后中等教育和高中后教育与言语理解之间的相关性并不明确。只有高中后教育的选择与言语理解表现出显著相关性。需要进一步研究来证实潜在的关系。