Peraire Marc, Arnau-Peiró Francisco, Villar-García Mariano, Benito Ana, Echeverria Iván, Haro Gonzalo
TXP Research Group, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, CEU Universities, Castelló de la Plana, Spain.
Department of Mental Health, Consorci Hospitalari Provincial de Castelló, Castelló de la Plana, Spain.
J Psychopharmacol. 2025 Nov;39(11):1284-1298. doi: 10.1177/02698811251355602. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
Clozapine (CLZ) stands out for its unique receptor profile, making it more effective than other antipsychotics, especially in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). There is growing evidence supporting its use in schizoaffective disorder (SZD), although diagnostic challenges and drug characteristics have complicated the implementation of specific clinical trials.
Compare efficacy and tolerability of CLZ in real-world patients with TRS and SZD.
Prospective, pragmatic, three-month, evaluator-blinded clinical trial with two randomised controlled arms (TRS groups) and a third fixed arm (SZD group). The clinical response was assessed by monthly visits during which the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Udvalg für Kliniske Undersogelser were administered. One hundred twenty-seven participants (74.8% men, 25.2% women; 84 TRS, 42 SZD; mean age of 38.53) completed the follow-up.
Patients treated with CLZ showed a greater reduction in all the PANSS subscales, MADRS and CDSS. In cases of SZD, there was a significant decrease in positive (: 3.72, < 0.05) and negative (: 6.58, < 0.01) symptoms, the overall score of PANSS (: 5.64, < 0.01) and YMRS (: 12.01, < 0.01). Patients using CLZ had a better subjective perception of their treatment (χ: 17.29, < 0.01). CLZ prescription was the only predictor of better outcomes across all the scales and improved substance use (dual disorders).
CLZ was effective in reducing psychotic and affective symptoms in patients with dual psychosis, with better outcomes in SZD compared with TRS.EudraCT protocol trial:2021-001278-44 (Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of clozapine in resistant schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder; ).
氯氮平(CLZ)因其独特的受体作用模式而脱颖而出,使其比其他抗精神病药物更有效,尤其是在难治性精神分裂症(TRS)的治疗中。越来越多的证据支持其在精神分裂症情感障碍(SZD)中的应用,尽管诊断挑战和药物特性使具体临床试验的实施变得复杂。
比较氯氮平在现实世界中TRS和SZD患者中的疗效和耐受性。
进行前瞻性、实用性、为期三个月、评估者盲法的临床试验,设有两个随机对照组(TRS组)和第三个固定组(SZD组)。通过每月访视评估临床反应,访视期间使用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)、青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)、蒙哥马利-艾斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)、精神分裂症卡尔加里抑郁量表(CDSS)、临床总体印象(CGI)和临床研究组量表进行评估。127名参与者(74.8%为男性,25.2%为女性;84名TRS患者,42名SZD患者;平均年龄38.53岁)完成了随访。
接受氯氮平治疗的患者在所有PANSS子量表、MADRS和CDSS上的得分下降幅度更大。在SZD患者中,阳性症状(:3.72, < 0.05)和阴性症状(:6.58, < 0.01)、PANSS总分(:5.64, < 0.01)和YMRS得分(:12.01, < 0.01)均显著下降。使用氯氮平的患者对其治疗的主观感受更好(χ:17.29, < 0.01)。氯氮平处方是所有量表上更好结果以及改善物质使用(双重障碍)的唯一预测因素。
氯氮平在减轻双相精神病患者的精神病性和情感症状方面有效,与TRS相比,在SZD患者中效果更好。欧洲临床试验注册号:2021-001278-44(氯氮平在难治性精神分裂症和精神分裂症情感障碍中的有效性比较分析;)