• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用3D打印聚醚醚酮(PEEK)或3D打印钛笼进行外侧椎间融合的临床前评估。

Preclinical evaluation of lateral interbody fusions using 3D printed PEEK or 3D printed titanium cages.

作者信息

Walsh William Robert, Pelletier Matthew, Wills Dan, Wang Tian, Lloyd Max, Veldman Michael, Cordaro Nick, Brady Mark

机构信息

Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Invibio Ltd. Hillhouse International, Thornton-Cleveleys, FY5 4QD, United Kingdom.

出版信息

N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jul 3;23:100756. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100756. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100756
PMID:40746902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12310441/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

PEEK interbody cages are well established. 3D porous PEEK designs can now be produced with additive manufacturing. This study compared the in-vivo response of additive manufactured porous PEEK (3D PEEK) and titanium alloy (3D Ti) cages.

METHODS

Interbody fusion was performed in 11 adult sheep at 2 levels (L2-3 and L4-5) using 3D PEEK and 3D Ti cages filled with autograft with posterior bilateral pedicle screw fixation. Fusions were evaluated at 8 and 16 weeks via manual palpation, microcomputed tomography (microCT), histology, and histomorphometry.

RESULTS

All animals recovered well following surgery with no adverse events. The radiolucent nature of PEEK allowed the fusions to be evaluated using radiographs and microCT. The 3D Ti cages however appeared solid rather than porous in the radiographs and presented artifacts in the microCT scans which precluded definitive determination of the fusions. Range of motion results improved with time for 3D PEEK and 3D Ti while no differences between designs were detected. Histology and histomorphometry confirmed 3D PEEK and 3D Ti supported fusion in this model using autograft.

CONCLUSIONS

Range of motion and histology results were similar for 3D PEEK and 3D Ti. Radiographs and microCT could be used to assess the fusions with 3D PEEK due to the radiolucent nature. 3D Ti appeared solid in the radiographs and had image artifact in microCT which precluded definitive evaluation of the fusions. 3D PEEK and 3D Ti cages both support interbody fusion in this preclinical model.

摘要

背景

聚醚醚酮(PEEK)椎间融合器已得到广泛应用。现在可以通过增材制造生产三维多孔PEEK设计。本研究比较了增材制造的多孔PEEK(3D PEEK)和钛合金(3D Ti)融合器在体内的反应。

方法

对11只成年绵羊的两个节段(L2-3和L4-5)进行椎间融合,使用填充自体骨的3D PEEK和3D Ti融合器,并进行双侧后路椎弓根螺钉固定。在8周和16周时通过手动触诊、微型计算机断层扫描(microCT)、组织学和组织形态计量学评估融合情况。

结果

所有动物术后恢复良好,无不良事件。PEEK的射线可透性使得可以使用X线片和microCT评估融合情况。然而,3D Ti融合器在X线片中显得实心而非多孔,并且在microCT扫描中出现伪影,这妨碍了对融合情况的明确判定。3D PEEK和3D Ti的运动范围结果随时间改善,且未检测到设计之间的差异。组织学和组织形态计量学证实,在该使用自体骨的模型中,3D PEEK和3D Ti均支持融合。

结论

3D PEEK和3D Ti的运动范围和组织学结果相似。由于PEEK的射线可透性,X线片和microCT可用于评估3D PEEK融合情况。3D Ti在X线片中显得实心,在microCT中有图像伪影,这妨碍了对融合情况的明确评估。在这个临床前模型中,3D PEEK和3D Ti融合器均支持椎间融合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/12310441/cf073e4eb5e7/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/12310441/1a5408aac6bc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/12310441/9e1429135629/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/12310441/d3ad0c9cdd0d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/12310441/cf073e4eb5e7/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/12310441/1a5408aac6bc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/12310441/9e1429135629/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/12310441/d3ad0c9cdd0d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35a1/12310441/cf073e4eb5e7/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Preclinical evaluation of lateral interbody fusions using 3D printed PEEK or 3D printed titanium cages.使用3D打印聚醚醚酮(PEEK)或3D打印钛笼进行外侧椎间融合的临床前评估。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Jul 3;23:100756. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100756. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages.钛(Ti)笼在腰椎体间融合中可能优于聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼:使用 Ti 与 PEEK 笼进行脊柱体间融合的临床和影像学结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2021 May;30(5):1285-1295. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06748-w. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
3
Clinical and radiological outcomes of titanium cage versus polyetheretherketone cage in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼用于腰椎椎间融合术的临床和影像学结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Mar 12;48(1):295. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03453-w.
4
Maximizing screw length in expandable lateral lumbar interbody spacers with integrated fixation may obviate the need for supplemental pedicle screws.在具有一体化固定功能的可扩张性腰椎椎间融合器中最大化螺钉长度,可能无需额外使用椎弓根螺钉。
Spine J. 2025 Jul;25(7):1564-1573. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.035. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
5
Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.3D打印多孔钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼用于腰椎椎间融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.111. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
6
Optimization of 3D-printed titanium interbody cage design. Part 2: An in vivo study of spinal fusion in sheep.3D打印钛椎间融合器设计的优化。第2部分:绵羊脊柱融合的体内研究。
Spine J. 2025 May;25(5):1060-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.014. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
7
Comparison of outcomes between 3D-printed porous titanium alloy and polyetheretherketone cages for atlantoaxial intra-articular fusion in craniovertebral malformations.3D打印多孔钛合金与聚醚醚酮椎间融合器用于颅颈畸形寰枢关节内融合的疗效比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2025 Jul 4;43(3):361-374. doi: 10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241148. Print 2025 Sep 1.
8
Radiological and clinical outcomes of novel Ti/PEEK combined spinal fusion cages: a systematic review and preclinical evaluation.新型钛/聚醚醚酮组合式脊柱融合器的影像学和临床结果:系统评价与临床前评估
Eur Spine J. 2017 Mar;26(3):593-605. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4353-8. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
9
3D-printed titanium cages without bone graft outperform PEEK cages with autograft in an animal model.3D 打印钛笼无需骨移植即可优于动物模型中使用自体移植物的 PEEK 笼。
Spine J. 2022 Jun;22(6):1016-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.12.004. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
10
Titanium Cages versus Polyetheretherketone Cages in Interbody Fusions: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.椎间融合术中钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼的比较:临床和影像学结果的荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.122. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimization of 3D-printed titanium interbody cage design. Part 2: An in vivo study of spinal fusion in sheep.3D打印钛椎间融合器设计的优化。第2部分:绵羊脊柱融合的体内研究。
Spine J. 2025 May;25(5):1060-1068. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.12.014. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
Advances in Implant Technologies for Spine Surgery.脊柱外科植入物技术的进展。
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2024 Apr;35(2):217-227. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.11.003. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
3
Performance of 3D printed porous polyetheretherketone composite scaffolds combined with nano-hydroxyapatite/carbon fiber in bone tissue engineering: a biological evaluation.
3D打印多孔聚醚醚酮复合支架与纳米羟基磷灰石/碳纤维结合在骨组织工程中的性能:生物学评价
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jan 25;12:1343294. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1343294. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.3D打印多孔钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼用于腰椎椎间融合治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.111. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
5
Novel 3D printed lattice structure titanium cages evaluated in an ovine model of interbody fusion.在绵羊椎间融合模型中评估新型3D打印晶格结构钛笼。
JOR Spine. 2023 Jun 10;6(3):e1268. doi: 10.1002/jsp2.1268. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Versus Polyetheretherketone Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review of Comparative In Vitro, Animal, and Human Studies.用于腰椎椎间融合的三维打印钛笼与聚醚醚酮笼:体外、动物和人体对比研究的系统评价
Neurospine. 2023 Jun;20(2):451-463. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346244.122. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
7
Titanium Lattice Structures Produced via Additive Manufacturing for a Bone Scaffold: A Review.通过增材制造生产用于骨支架的钛晶格结构:综述
J Funct Biomater. 2023 Feb 24;14(3):125. doi: 10.3390/jfb14030125.
8
Porous Polyetheretherketone Interbody Cages for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at 3 or More Levels: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.用于三节及以上节段颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的多孔聚醚醚酮椎间融合器:临床及影像学结果
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):215-221. doi: 10.14444/8410. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
9
Additive manufactured polyether-ether-ketone implants for orthopaedic applications: a narrative review.用于骨科应用的增材制造聚醚醚酮植入物:一篇叙述性综述。
Biomater Transl. 2022 Jun 28;3(2):116-133. doi: 10.12336/biomatertransl.2022.02.001. eCollection 2022.
10
Development of an architecture-property model for triply periodic minimal surface structures and validation using material extrusion additive manufacturing with polyetheretherketone (PEEK).三周期极小曲面结构的构效模型开发及其采用聚醚醚酮(PEEK)的材料挤出增材制造的验证。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022 Sep;133:105345. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105345. Epub 2022 Jun 29.