• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高压电损伤患者微生物学监测结果:一项为期10年的单中心经验。

Results of microbiological surveillance in patients with high-voltage eletrical injuries: A 10-year single center experience.

作者信息

Váňa V, Lipový B, Cvanová M, Hanslianová M, Holoubek J

出版信息

Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2025;74(2):97-106. doi: 10.61568/emi/11-6492/20250428/140415.

DOI:10.61568/emi/11-6492/20250428/140415
PMID:40747749
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

High voltage electrotrauma is one of the most serious injuries we can encounter in modern medicine, often associated with multiple disabilities and high susceptibility to infectious complications. These patients are admitted to specialized burn centers and require extensive multidisciplinary collaboration. In this study, we aim to uncover the prevalence, types and characteristics of microbial infections that develop in the aftermath of high voltage electrotrauma and to identify risk factors that may contribute to patients' susceptibility to infections.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For the purposes of this publication, data of all 37 patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit of the Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery of the University Hospital in Brno with a diagnosis of high-voltage electrical injury between 2006-2016 were processed. Imprints and swaps from exfoliated areas were repeatedly taken for microbial analysis, together with tracheobronchial aspirate fluid, sputum, or bronchoalveolar lavage, urine and peripheral blood. The obtained data were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Among the 37 patients, the median age was 31.9, with an average hospital stay of 44.3 days and a mortality rate of 8.1%. A total of 28 individuals were dependent on artificial lung ventilation. The incidence of infectious complications varies during the hospitalization period according to the location of sampling cultivation and time spent at the hospital. 97.3% of patients developed infection in at least one body compartment. In 88.8% of cases, it was multipathogenic and in 41.6% a septic condition developed. In our study cohort, G+ dominated over Gstrains. Most common representatives from G+ spectrum were Coagulase negative Staphylococci (97%), Staphylococcus aureus (57%), Enterococcus fecalis et faecium (51%). In Gspectrum, the order was as followed: Klebsiella pneumoniae (46%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (41%), Escherichia coli (35%) and Acinetobacter baumannii (18.9%). The most common infection observed was burn wound infection (BWI), followed by bloodstream infections (BSI), lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI), and urinary tract infections (UTI), primarily caused by G+ pathogens. Notably, an increased hospital stay duration was associated with a rising prevalence of Gpathogens, particularly K. pneumoniae P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii which exhibited a high degree of antimicrobial resistance.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a detailed insight into the occurrence and consequences of high-voltage electrical injuries in Moravia over a decade. Factors significantly impacting survival and severity of outcomes included total burn surface area, full-thickness burns, inhalation injury, and the need for tracheostomy. However, the study is limited by its relatively small sample size, long data collection period with potential changes in clinical practice, and single-center design, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. Further multicentric studies are needed to validate these results and refine infection prevention strategies in this patient population.

摘要

背景与目的

高压电创伤是现代医学中最严重的损伤之一,常伴有多种残疾且极易发生感染性并发症。这些患者需入住专业烧伤中心,并需要广泛的多学科协作。在本研究中,我们旨在揭示高压电创伤后发生的微生物感染的患病率、类型和特征,并确定可能导致患者易感染的危险因素。

材料与方法

为撰写本论文,我们处理了2006年至2016年间在布尔诺大学医院烧伤与整形外科重症监护病房住院的所有37例诊断为高压电损伤患者的数据。反复采集脱落部位的印记和拭子进行微生物分析,同时采集气管支气管吸出液、痰液、支气管肺泡灌洗液、尿液和外周血。对获得的数据进行回顾性分析。

结果

37例患者中,中位年龄为31.9岁,平均住院时间为44.3天,死亡率为8.1%。共有28人依赖人工肺通气。根据采样培养部位和住院时间,住院期间感染并发症的发生率有所不同。97.3%的患者至少有一个身体部位发生感染。在88.8%的病例中,感染为多病原体感染,41.6%的病例发生了败血症。在我们的研究队列中,革兰氏阳性菌(G+)多于革兰氏阴性菌(G-)。G+菌谱中最常见的代表是凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(97%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(57%)、粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌(51%)。在G-菌谱中,顺序如下:肺炎克雷伯菌(46%)、铜绿假单胞菌(41%)、大肠杆菌(35%)和鲍曼不动杆菌(18.9%)。观察到的最常见感染是烧伤创面感染(BWI),其次是血流感染(BSI)、下呼吸道感染(LRTI)和尿路感染(UTI),主要由G+病原体引起。值得注意的是,住院时间延长与G-病原体患病率上升相关,尤其是肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌,它们表现出高度的抗菌耐药性。

结论

本研究详细深入地了解了摩拉维亚地区十年来高压电损伤的发生情况及后果。显著影响生存和预后严重程度的因素包括烧伤总面积、全层烧伤、吸入性损伤以及气管切开的必要性。然而,本研究存在局限性,样本量相对较小、数据收集期长且临床实践可能发生变化,以及单中心设计,这可能影响研究结果的普遍性。需要进一步的多中心研究来验证这些结果,并完善该患者群体的感染预防策略。

相似文献

1
Results of microbiological surveillance in patients with high-voltage eletrical injuries: A 10-year single center experience.高压电损伤患者微生物学监测结果:一项为期10年的单中心经验。
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2025;74(2):97-106. doi: 10.61568/emi/11-6492/20250428/140415.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Bronchoscopy-guided antimicrobial therapy for cystic fibrosis.支气管镜引导下的囊性纤维化抗菌治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 3;5(5):CD009530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009530.pub5.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Antibiotic treatment for non-tuberculous mycobacteria lung infection in people with cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者非结核分枝杆菌肺部感染的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 27;3(3):CD016039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016039.
10
Bronchoscopy-guided antimicrobial therapy for cystic fibrosis.支气管镜引导下的囊性纤维化抗菌治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 23(12):CD009530. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009530.pub2.