Zhou Wen-Yan, Zhang Lian-Lian, Zhou Xiao, Pan Xian-Bin, Qi Long-Xiu
Department of Ultrasound , Yancheng No. 1 People's Hospital (The First People's Hospital of Yancheng), Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, China.
Department of Radiology, Yancheng No. 1 People's Hospital (The First People's Hospital of Yancheng), Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, China.
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2025 Aug 1. doi: 10.17219/acem/203584.
Breast cancer remains a major healthcare challenge, highlighting the need for early and accurate diagnosis. Shear-wave elastography (SWE), an ultrasound-based imaging technique that quantifies tissue elasticity, has emerged as a promising tool. Recent studies suggest that SWE may provide additional diagnostic value when used alongside conventional imaging methods.
This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of SWE when combined with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of breast lesions.
This retrospective study included patients with breast lesions who underwent SWE, conventional ultrasound and MRI. The diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated individually and in combination. Histopathological results served as the gold standard for diagnosis. Key performance metrics - sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy - were calculated for each imaging approach.
A total of 99 patients were included in the study, comprising 64 with benign lesions and 35 with malignant lesions. Malignant lesions were generally larger and exhibited distinct imaging characteristics across ultrasound, SWE and MRI. When assessed individually, SWE, ultrasound and MRI showed comparable diagnostic accuracy (64.6%, 62.6% and 62.6%, respectively). However, combining all 3 modalities significantly improved diagnostic performance, yielding sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy of 94.3%, 89.1%, 82.5%, 96.6%, and 90.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for the combined approach was significantly higher than for any single modality (0.917 vs 0.642, 0.627 and 0.633; p < 0.001).
While SWE alone offers diagnostic performance comparable to that of ultrasound and MRI individually, its greatest value lies in combination with these imaging modalities. Integrating ultrasound, SWE and MRI significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, offering a promising multimodal approach for more reliable differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.
乳腺癌仍然是一项重大的医疗保健挑战,凸显了早期准确诊断的必要性。剪切波弹性成像(SWE)是一种基于超声的成像技术,可对组织弹性进行量化,已成为一种有前景的工具。最近的研究表明,SWE与传统成像方法联合使用时可能提供额外的诊断价值。
本研究旨在评估SWE与传统超声和磁共振成像(MRI)联合用于评估乳腺病变时的诊断性能。
这项回顾性研究纳入了接受SWE、传统超声和MRI检查的乳腺病变患者。分别评估并联合评估了每种检查方法的诊断性能。组织病理学结果作为诊断的金标准。计算了每种成像方法的关键性能指标——敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和总体准确性。
本研究共纳入99例患者,其中64例为良性病变,35例为恶性病变。恶性病变通常更大,在超声、SWE和MRI上表现出不同的成像特征。单独评估时,SWE、超声和MRI显示出相当的诊断准确性(分别为64.6%、62.6%和62.6%)。然而,将这三种检查方法联合使用可显著提高诊断性能,敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和总体准确性分别为94.3%、89.1%、82.5%、96.6%和90.9%(p<0.001)。联合检查方法的曲线下面积(AUC)显著高于任何单一检查方法(0.917对0.642、0.627和0.