• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家重点生态功能区的设立是否降低了气候风险?

Has the establishment of national key ecological function areas reduced climate risk?

作者信息

Yang Jimei, Jin Minghui, Liu Kai-di, Yao Lianxiao, Cheng Liang

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China.

Qingdao Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao, China; Center for Yellow River Ecosystem Products, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2025 Sep;392:126776. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126776. Epub 2025 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126776
PMID:40749549
Abstract

Climate risk is one of the important challenges facing the globe. To address the risks of ecological degradation and climate change, China has designated National Key Ecological Functional Areas (NKEFAs) in successive batches. As an important ecological policy for achieving environmental protection and spatial management, their establishment plays a crucial role in improving ecological conditions and mitigating climate risk. This study treats the establishment of NKEFAs as a quasi-natural experiment. It uses 1990-2022 panel data from prefecture-level cities and employs a staggered difference-in-difference (DID) model to assess the impact of NKEFAs on climate risk. It is found that the establishment of NKEFAs reduces climate risk, and this finding passes a series of robustness tests. NKEFAs reduce climate risk mainly by optimizing industrial structure, improving environmental quality, and reducing CO emissions. Further analysis reveals that NKEFAs have significant heterogeneity impact on reducing climate risk across resource carrying capacity, resource endowment, and urban location. It shows a pronounced reducing effect in windbreak-and-sand-fixing and soil-and-water conservation ecological functional areas, and the policy's impact on reducing climate risk is more significant for non-resource-based cities, eastern cities, and central cities. Based on this, future efforts should focus on strengthening the long-term development of NKEFAs, promoting the coordination between ecological conservation and industrial planning, and enhancing environmental governance capacity to accelerate the low-carbon transition. Differentiated policies should be formulated according to local ecological and climatic conditions to achieve effective and sustained climate risk management.

摘要

气候风险是全球面临的重要挑战之一。为应对生态退化和气候变化风险,中国已陆续划定了国家重点生态功能区。作为实现环境保护和空间治理的一项重要生态政策,其设立对于改善生态状况和缓解气候风险发挥着关键作用。本研究将国家重点生态功能区的设立视为一项准自然实验。利用1990 - 2022年地级市面板数据,采用交错双重差分(DID)模型评估国家重点生态功能区对气候风险的影响。研究发现,国家重点生态功能区的设立降低了气候风险,这一发现通过了一系列稳健性检验。国家重点生态功能区主要通过优化产业结构、改善环境质量和减少碳排放来降低气候风险。进一步分析表明,国家重点生态功能区在降低气候风险方面,在资源承载能力、资源禀赋和城市区位方面存在显著的异质性影响。在防风固沙和水土保持生态功能区显示出明显的降低效果,且该政策对非资源型城市、东部城市和中部城市降低气候风险的影响更为显著。基于此,未来应着力加强国家重点生态功能区的长效发展,促进生态保护与产业规划的协调,提升环境治理能力以加速低碳转型。应根据当地生态和气候条件制定差异化政策,以实现有效且持续的气候风险管理。

相似文献

1
Has the establishment of national key ecological function areas reduced climate risk?国家重点生态功能区的设立是否降低了气候风险?
J Environ Manage. 2025 Sep;392:126776. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126776. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Potential of shifting work hours for reducing heat-related loss and regional disparities in China: a modelling analysis.调整工作时间对减少中国与高温相关的损失及地区差异的潜力:一项建模分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00079-8.
4
[Changes in Ecosystem Services and Equity Identification in Nanchang Under the Influence of Construction Land Expansion].建设用地扩张影响下南昌市生态系统服务变化与公平性识别
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jul 8;46(7):4641-4656. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202407031.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Can the Establishment of National Key Ecological Function Areas Enhance Vegetation Carbon Sink? A Quasi-Natural Experiment Evidence from China.国家重点生态功能区的建立能否增强植被碳汇?来自中国的准自然实验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 26;19(19):12215. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912215.
7
How to reduce urban agglomeration carbon emissions through transportation management? A case study of the Yangtze River Delta in China.如何通过交通管理减少城市群碳排放?以中国长江三角洲地区为例。
J Environ Manage. 2025 Sep;392:126723. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126723. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
8
[Spatial-temporal Differentiation Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Cultivated Land NPP in Major Grain Producing Areas (Henan Province)].[主要粮食产区(河南省)耕地净初级生产力的时空分异特征及影响因素]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025 Jun 8;46(6):3632-3644. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202406053.
9
Framework and methodology for hierarchical determination of ecological conservation priority areas in China's Taihang Mountains.中国太行山区生态保护优先区域分层确定的框架与方法
J Environ Manage. 2025 Aug;389:125991. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125991. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
10
Made in China 2025: Artificial intelligence intervention and urban green economy development.《中国制造2025》:人工智能干预与城市绿色经济发展
J Environ Manage. 2025 Sep;391:126411. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126411. Epub 2025 Jul 4.