• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓损伤水平、严重程度及完整性的远程神经学评估(TNASCI)的开发:可靠性与有效性

Development of the tele-neurological assessment for the level, severity, and completeness of spinal cord injury (TNASCI): reliability and validity.

作者信息

Techaworarak Phantira, Eitivipart Aitthanatt C, Pattanakuhar Sintip, Waongenngarm Pooriput

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, Bangkok, Thailand.

Accessibility and Assistive Technology Research Team, Assistive Technology and Medical Devices Research Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2025 Aug 1. doi: 10.1038/s41393-025-01109-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41393-025-01109-6
PMID:40751089
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Psychometric study.

OBJECTIVES

To introduce a novel, simple, tele-assessment tool designed to report the level and severity of spinal cord injury (SCI) and to assess its reliability and validity.

SETTING

Two academic-affiliated rehabilitation facilities in Thailand.

METHODS

The Tele-Neurological Assessment for the level, severity, and completeness of Spinal Cord Injury (TNASCI) was designed to assess the SCI level and severity according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) using telecommunication. This study comprised three phases: (1) the development process involving three experts using the Delphi method, (2) a face validity examination of each TNASCI item's comprehension and suitability, and (3) an evaluation of the concurrent validity, intra-rater reliability, and inter-rater reliability using data from 40 participants with chronic SCI (>12 months post-injury).

RESULTS

The Thai version of TNASCI, was developed to contain four sections, including sensory, motor, anorectal function, and summary sections to determine the SCI level and severity grade. The assessment tool exhibited good face validity. When compared with the ISNCSCI, the TNASCI showed good to excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2,1) of 0.791-0.941 and an ICC (3,1) of 0.785-1.00, and good to excellent validity in almost all sections except for the sensory-related components (r = 0.764-0.986).

CONCLUSIONS

Our TNASCI tool, which was assessed by trained clinicians, demonstrated acceptable inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, face validity, and concurrent validity. It serves as an alternative tool to evaluate the SCI level and severity predominantly in people with chronic, motor-complete SCI who cannot be evaluated using the hands-on ISNCSCI in person. However, this study is an initial step in validating a novel tele-assessment tool, with future studies needed to confirm its utility in other conditions and settings.

摘要

研究设计

心理测量学研究。

目的

引入一种新颖、简单的远程评估工具,用于报告脊髓损伤(SCI)的程度和严重程度,并评估其可靠性和有效性。

地点

泰国的两家学术附属康复机构。

方法

脊髓损伤水平、严重程度和完整性的远程神经学评估(TNASCI)旨在根据国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准(ISNCSCI),利用电信评估SCI水平和严重程度。本研究包括三个阶段:(1)采用德尔菲法,由三位专家参与的开发过程;(2)对TNASCI每个项目的理解和适用性进行表面效度检查;(3)使用40名慢性SCI患者(受伤后超过12个月)的数据,评估同时效度、评分者内信度和评分者间信度。

结果

TNASCI的泰语版本包含四个部分,包括感觉、运动、肛门直肠功能和总结部分,以确定SCI水平和严重程度等级。该评估工具表现出良好的表面效度。与ISNCSCI相比,TNASCI显示出良好至优秀的评分者间和评分者内信度,组内相关系数(ICC)(2,1)为0.791 - 0.941,ICC(3,1)为0.785 - 1.00,除感觉相关成分外,几乎所有部分的效度良好至优秀(r = 0.764 - 0.986)。

结论

我们的TNASCI工具经训练有素的临床医生评估,显示出可接受的评分者间和评分者内信度、表面效度和同时效度。它是一种替代工具,主要用于评估慢性、运动完全性SCI患者的SCI水平和严重程度,这些患者无法亲自使用实践操作的ISNCSCI进行评估。然而,本研究是验证一种新型远程评估工具的初步步骤,未来需要进一步研究以确认其在其他情况和环境中的效用。

相似文献

1
Development of the tele-neurological assessment for the level, severity, and completeness of spinal cord injury (TNASCI): reliability and validity.脊髓损伤水平、严重程度及完整性的远程神经学评估(TNASCI)的开发:可靠性与有效性
Spinal Cord. 2025 Aug 1. doi: 10.1038/s41393-025-01109-6.
2
Muscle Excitability Scale for the assessment of spastic reflexes in spinal cord injury: development and evaluation.肌肉兴奋性量表用于评估脊髓损伤中的痉挛反射:开发和评估。
Spinal Cord. 2024 Sep;62(9):532-538. doi: 10.1038/s41393-024-01016-2. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
3
Validity and Reliability of Interview and Online Self-Report Versions of Motor and Sensory Components of a Neurological Exam for Classifying Spinal Cord Injury (One-SCI).用于脊髓损伤(单发性脊髓损伤)分类的神经学检查中运动和感觉成分的访谈版与在线自我报告版的有效性和可靠性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.05.016.
4
Development of Interview and Online Self-Report Versions of Motor and Sensory Components of a Neurological Exam for Classifying Spinal Cord Injury (One-SCI).
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Jun 1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.021.
5
A study on the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Scenario Test for people with chronic stroke-induced aphasia: A cross-sectional study.一项关于慢性脑卒中性失语症患者情景测试日语版的信度和效度的研究:一项横断面研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1878-1892. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13040. Epub 2024 May 1.
6
Translation and validation of the French version of the spinal cord independence measure III (SCIM III).脊髓独立功能评定量表III(SCIM III)法语版的翻译与验证
Spinal Cord. 2025 May 29. doi: 10.1038/s41393-025-01082-0.
7
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
8
Reliability and Validity of the Sensory Component of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI): A Systematic Review.脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(ISNCSCI)感觉成分的信度和效度:一项系统评价
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Summer;21(3):241-9. doi: 10.1310/sci2103-241. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
9
Validity and intra- and inter-rater reliability of the Tinetti performance-oriented mobility assessment balance subscale using different tele-assessment methods in patients with chronic stroke.在慢性卒中患者中使用不同远程评估方法时,Tinetti以性能为导向的移动性评估平衡子量表的效度及评分者内和评分者间信度。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2024 Sep;31(6):547-555. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2024.2307195. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
10
An Evaluation of International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) Performance Within the Canadian SCI Network.加拿大脊髓损伤网络内脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(ISNCSCI)性能评估
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2025 Summer;31(3):15-36. doi: 10.46292/sci25-00011. Epub 2025 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Models of Telehealth Service Delivery in Adults With Spinal Cord Injuries: Scoping Review.脊髓损伤成人的远程医疗服务提供模式:范围综述
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jun 29;10:e41186. doi: 10.2196/41186.
2
Accuracy of self-reported severity and level of spinal cord injury.自我报告的严重程度和脊髓损伤程度的准确性。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Oct;60(10):934-941. doi: 10.1038/s41393-022-00855-1. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
Testing Our Children When the World Shuts Down: Analyzing Recommendations for Adapted Tele-Assessment during COVID-19.
当世界停摆时对我们的孩子进行测试:分析新冠疫情期间适应性远程评估的建议
J Psychoeduc Assess. 2020 Dec;38(8):923-941. doi: 10.1177/0734282920962839. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
4
The clinical effectiveness of telehealth: A systematic review of meta-analyses from 2010 to 2019.远程医疗的临床效果:2010 年至 2019 年荟萃分析的系统评价。
J Telemed Telecare. 2023 Oct;29(9):669-684. doi: 10.1177/1357633X211022907. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
5
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Revised 2019.《脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准:2019年修订版》
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2021 Spring;27(2):1-22. doi: 10.46292/sci2702-1.
6
Characterizing the Experience of Spasticity after Spinal Cord Injury: A National Survey Project of the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers.描述脊髓损伤后痉挛的体验:脊髓损伤模型系统中心的全国性调查项目。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr;103(4):764-772.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.040. Epub 2021 May 17.
7
Theoretical and practical training improves knowledge of the examination guidelines of the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury.理论与实践培训提高了对国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准检查指南的了解。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Jan;60(1):1-10. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-00578-1. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
8
Modified PRISM and SCI-SET Spasticity Measures for Persons With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Results of a Rasch Analyses.改良 PRISM 和 SCI-SET 痉挛评估量表在创伤性脊髓损伤患者中的应用:一项 Rasch 分析结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Sep;101(9):1570-1579. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.05.012. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
9
The Expedited International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (E-ISNCSCI).脊髓损伤神经学分类国际快速标准(E-ISNCSCI)。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Jun;58(6):633-634. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0462-2. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
10
An interview based approach to the anorectal portion of the International Standards of Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Exam (I-A-ISNCSCI): a pilot study.基于访谈的国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准(I-A-ISNCSCI)肛门直肠部分检查方法:一项初步研究。
Spinal Cord. 2020 May;58(5):553-559. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0399-5. Epub 2019 Dec 10.