Talebi Shokoofeh, Shirani Mahsa, Mahdavi Atena, Bagherniya Mohammad, Sahebkar Amirhossein
Student Research Committee, Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, and Nutrition and Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Phytother Res. 2025 Sep;39(9):4094-4115. doi: 10.1002/ptr.70054. Epub 2025 Aug 2.
Chronic diseases cause early death and financial strain worldwide. Cardio-metabolic health, crucial for preventing cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes, may benefit from bilberry's antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. This meta-analysis reviews studies of bilberry's impact on lipid profiles, glycemic indices, body composition, and inflammatory and oxidative factors. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials assessing bilberry supplementation in adults for at least 1 week. A comprehensive review of literature was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar until July 21, 2024, without any time limitations. Mean changes and their SDs were used to calculate overall effect sizes, with the Hozo et al. method converting SEs, 95% CIs, and IQRs to SDs. A random-effects model accounted for between-study variations. Eleven RCTs, including 409 individuals, were incorporated into the present systematic review, and 8 were included in the meta-analysis. Combining five effect sizes from the five trials on long-term effects of bilberry administration compared with controls resulted in a non-significant decrease in FBG (WMD: -0.08 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.22 to 0.07, p = 0.30). For HbA1c, the meta-analysis of three RCTs showed a marginally significant reduction (WMD: -1.63%, 95% CI: -3.36% to 0.11%, p = 0.06). The results of the meta-analysis on lipid profile showed a decreasing trend, although this reduction was not statistically significant for TC (WMD: -0.11 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.30% to 0.08%, p = 0.27) or TG (WMD: -0.07 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.32% to 0.19%, p = 0.62). However, a significant change in TG was reported in trials with a crossover design and RCTs with 4 weeks of intervention or less. Although HDL level did not show any significant change (WMD: -0.02 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.10% to 0.07%, p = 0.70), the meta-analysis of five RCTs evaluating the long-term effects of bilberry supplementation revealed a significant change in LDL following bilberry supplementation (WMD: 0.07 mmol/L, 95% CI: 0.01%-0.14%, p = 0.01). Furthermore, no significant reduction was observed in SBP (WMD: -2.75 mmHg, 95% CI: -6.38% to 0.89%, p = 0.13) or DBP (WMD: -1.00 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.66% to 2.65%, p = 0.59) after bilberry supplementation. Finally, anthropometric indices including body weight (WMD: 0.04 Kg, 95% CI: -0.44% to 0.53%, p = 0.86) and inflammatory and oxidative stress markers including hs-CRP (WMD: -8.22 mg/L, 95% CI: -20.24% to 3.81%, p = 0.18), IL-6 (WMD: -7.19 pg/mL, 95% CI: -19.01% to 4.63%, p = 0.23), uric acid (WMD: -0.01 mmol/L, 95% CI: -0.03% to 0.01%, p = 0.36), and FRAP (WMD: -42.03 μmol/L, 95% CI: -100.54% to 16.48%, p = 0.16) showed no significant change after bilberry supplementation. Bilberry supplementation may have beneficial effects on HbA1c and TG, but not other cardio-metabolic indices. Therefore, long-term and high-quality trials are needed to confirm the promising effects of bilberries.
慢性病在全球范围内导致过早死亡和经济负担。心脏代谢健康对于预防心血管疾病和2型糖尿病至关重要,可能受益于越橘的抗氧化和抗炎特性。这项荟萃分析回顾了关于越橘对血脂谱、血糖指数、身体成分以及炎症和氧化因子影响的研究。纳入标准是评估成人补充越橘至少1周的随机临床试验。截至2024年7月21日,在PubMed、科学网、Scopus和谷歌学术上对文献进行了全面检索,没有任何时间限制。使用均值变化及其标准差来计算总体效应量,采用Hozo等人的方法将标准误、95%置信区间和四分位距转换为标准差。随机效应模型考虑了研究间的差异。本系统评价纳入了11项随机对照试验,共409名个体,荟萃分析纳入了8项。将五项关于越橘给药长期效果与对照组比较的试验的效应量合并后,空腹血糖(WMD:-0.08 mmol/L,95%置信区间:-0.22至0.07,p = 0.30)无显著降低。对于糖化血红蛋白,三项随机对照试验的荟萃分析显示有轻微显著降低(WMD:-1.63%,95%置信区间:-3.36%至0.11%,p = 0.06)。血脂谱的荟萃分析结果显示有下降趋势,尽管总胆固醇(WMD:-0.11 mmol/L,95%置信区间:-0.30%至0.08%,p = 0.27)或甘油三酯(WMD:-0.07 mmol/L,95%置信区间:-0.32%至0.19%,p = 0.62)的降低无统计学意义。然而,在交叉设计试验和干预4周或更短时间的随机对照试验中,甘油三酯有显著变化。尽管高密度脂蛋白水平无显著变化(WMD:-0.02 mmol/L,95%置信区间:-0.10%至0.07%,p = 0.70),五项评估越橘补充长期效果的随机对照试验的荟萃分析显示,补充越橘后低密度脂蛋白有显著变化(WMD:0.07 mmol/L,95%置信区间:0.01% - 0.14%,p = 0.01)。此外,补充越橘后收缩压(WMD:-2.75 mmHg,95%置信区间:-6.38%至0.89%,p = 0.13)或舒张压(WMD:-1.00 mmHg,95%置信区间:-4.66%至2.65%,p = 0.59)无显著降低。最后,包括体重(WMD:0.04 Kg,95%置信区间:-0.44%至0.53%,p = 0.86)在内的人体测量指标以及包括高敏C反应蛋白(WMD:-8.22 mg/L,95%置信区间:-20.24%至3.81%,p = 0.18)、白细胞介素 - 6(WMD:-7.19 pg/mL,95%置信区间:-19.01%至4.63%,p = 0.23)、尿酸(WMD:-0.01 mmol/L,95%置信区间:-0.03%至0.01%,p = 0.36)和铁还原抗氧化能力(WMD:-42.03 μmol/L,95%置信区间:-100.54%至16.48%,p = 0.16)在内的炎症和氧化应激标志物在补充越橘后无显著变化。补充越橘可能对糖化血红蛋白和甘油三酯有有益影响,但对其他心脏代谢指标无影响。因此,需要长期和高质量的试验来证实越橘的潜在有益效果。