• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于预测强化血压治疗益处的风险分层模型:收缩压干预试验分析

A Risk Stratification Model for Predicting Benefits of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment: Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.

作者信息

Li Na, Yang Zhixin, Yuan Quan, Cheng Wenli

机构信息

Department of Health Care (Geriatrics), China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China.

Department of Mathematical Sciences, Ball State University, Muncie, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Aug;27(8):e70098. doi: 10.1111/jch.70098.

DOI:10.1111/jch.70098
PMID:40751458
Abstract

Current hypertension guidelines lack personalized strategies for blood pressure control. While the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) demonstrated benefits of intensive blood pressure lowering, identifying optimal candidates for such treatment remains challenging. We developed and validated a risk stratification model using data from 9139 SPRINT participants. The model incorporated 11 clinical variables through multivariable Cox regression analysis. Patients were stratified into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups. The study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01206062). The model showed good discrimination with C-indices of 0.7354 (95% CI: 0.7065-0.7710) and 0.6894 (95% CI: 0.6545-0.7266) at 3 years for training and validation sets, respectively. Intensive treatment significantly reduced cardiovascular events in medium-risk (3.17% vs. 5.11%, p = 0.0376) and high-risk groups (9.34% vs. 11.86%, p = 0.0269), while showing a nonsignificant trend in the low-risk group (2.87% vs. 3.34%, p = 0.0870). The Rank-Weighted Average Treatment Effect analysis (16.06) supported potential benefits from individualized treatment allocation. No increased risk of severe adverse events was observed across risk groups. Our risk stratification model effectively identifies patients who derive significant cardiovascular benefits from intensive blood pressure lowering, particularly in medium- and high-risk groups. This approach could guide more personalized hypertension management strategies.

摘要

当前的高血压指南缺乏个性化的血压控制策略。虽然收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)证明了强化降压的益处,但确定此类治疗的最佳候选者仍然具有挑战性。我们利用来自9139名SPRINT参与者的数据开发并验证了一种风险分层模型。该模型通过多变量Cox回归分析纳入了11个临床变量。患者被分为低、中、高风险组。该研究方案已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT01206062)注册。该模型显示出良好的区分度,训练集和验证集在3年时的C指数分别为0.7354(95%CI:0.7065 - 0.7710)和0.6894(95%CI:0.6545 - 0.7266)。强化治疗在中风险组(3.17%对5.11%,p = 0.0376)和高风险组(9.34%对11.86%,p = 0.0269)中显著降低了心血管事件,而在低风险组中显示出不显著的趋势(2.87%对3.34%,p = 0.0870)。秩加权平均治疗效果分析(16.06)支持了个体化治疗分配的潜在益处。在各风险组中均未观察到严重不良事件风险增加。我们的风险分层模型有效地识别出了从强化降压中获得显著心血管益处的患者,特别是在中、高风险组中。这种方法可以指导更个性化的高血压管理策略。

相似文献

1
A Risk Stratification Model for Predicting Benefits of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment: Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.一种用于预测强化血压治疗益处的风险分层模型:收缩压干预试验分析
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2025 Aug;27(8):e70098. doi: 10.1111/jch.70098.
2
Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Control and Comorbidity Status on the Prognosis of Patients With Hypertension: Insights From SPRINT.强化血压控制及合并症状态对高血压患者预后的影响:来自收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)的见解
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):e036719. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036719. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
3
Benefit and Harm of Intensive Blood Pressure Control by Cardiovascular Risk.心血管风险因素对强化血压控制的利弊
Hypertension. 2025 Aug;82(8):1392-1400. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.125.25162. Epub 2025 Jun 26.
4
Blood pressure targets for the treatment of people with hypertension and cardiovascular disease.高血压和心血管疾病患者治疗的血压目标
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 11;10(10):CD010315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010315.pub2.
5
Role of Diuretics in Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial: A Post Hoc Analysis.利尿剂在收缩压干预试验中的心血管事件和死亡率中的作用:事后分析。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 May 1;19(5):620-627. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000406. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
6
Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.强化降压对心血管和肾脏结局的影响:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):435-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00805-3. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
7
Educational Attainment and the Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Study.教育程度与强化降压效果:SPRINT研究的事后分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):e037712. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037712. Epub 2025 May 21.
8
Relationship Between Sarcopenia and Intensive Blood Pressure Control Efficacy and Safety: A Secondary Analysis of SPRINT.肌少症与强化血压控制疗效和安全性的关系:SPRINT 的二次分析。
Hypertension. 2024 Aug;81(8):e77-e87. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23011. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
9
Blood pressure targets for the treatment of people with hypertension and cardiovascular disease.高血压和心血管疾病患者治疗的血压目标
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 20;7(7):CD010315. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010315.pub3.
10
Blood pressure targets for hypertension in people with chronic renal disease.高血压合并慢性肾脏病患者的血压目标。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 15;10(10):CD008564. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008564.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating Treatment Prioritization Rules via Rank-Weighted Average Treatment Effects.通过秩加权平均治疗效果评估治疗优先级规则
J Am Stat Assoc. 2025;120(549):38-51. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2024.2393466. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes.2023年欧洲心脏病学会糖尿病患者心血管疾病管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 14;44(39):4043-4140. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad192.
3
The Effect of Frailty on the Efficacy and Safety of Intensive Blood Pressure Control: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT Trial.
衰弱对强化血压控制疗效和安全性的影响:SPRINT 试验的事后分析。
Circulation. 2023 Aug 15;148(7):565-574. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064003. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
4
SCORE2-Diabetes: 10-year cardiovascular risk estimation in type 2 diabetes in Europe.SCORE2-Diabetes:欧洲 2 型糖尿病的 10 年心血管风险评估。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Jul 21;44(28):2544-2556. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad260.
5
Trial of Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Older Patients with Hypertension.老年高血压患者强化血压控制试验。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 30;385(14):1268-1279. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111437. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
6
Age-stratified and blood-pressure-stratified effects of blood-pressure-lowering pharmacotherapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis.降压药物治疗预防心血管疾病和死亡的年龄分层和血压分层效应:一项个体参与者水平数据的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2021 Sep 18;398(10305):1053-1064. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01921-8. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
7
Impact of Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Management by Tertiles of Blood Pressure in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).SPRINT(收缩压干预试验)中按血压三分位分层的强化与标准血压管理对血压的影响。
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1064-1074. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10646. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
8
Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Synopsis of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guideline.成人高血压的预防、检测、评估和管理:2017 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会高血压指南概要。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Mar 6;168(5):351-358. doi: 10.7326/M17-3203. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
9
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师协会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年病学会/美国药学协会/美国血液学会/美国预防医学学会/美国医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):e127-e248. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
10
Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on Effects of Intensive Compared With Standard Blood Pressure Control.基础舒张压对强化与标准血压控制效果影响的研究。
Circulation. 2018 Jan 9;137(2):134-143. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030848. Epub 2017 Oct 11.