Suppr超能文献

阻断土壤传播蠕虫传播的可行性:在贝宁、印度和马拉维开展的DeWorm3社区整群随机对照试验

Feasibility of interrupting the transmission of soil-transmitted helminths: the DeWorm3 community cluster-randomised controlled trial in Benin, India, and Malawi.

作者信息

Ajjampur Sitara Swarna Rao, Aruldas Kumudha, Ásbjörnsdóttir Kristjana H, Avokpaho Euripide, Bailey Robin, Cottrell Gilles, Galagan Sean R, Halliday Katherine E, Houngbégnon Parfait, Ibikounlé Moudachirou, Israel Gideon John, Kaliappan Saravanakumar Puthupalayam, Kalua Khumbo, Legge Hugo, Littlewood D Timothy J, Luty Adrian J F, Manuel Malathi, Massougbodji Achille, Means Arianna Rubin, Oswald William E, Pilotte Nils, Pullan Rachel, Ramesh Rohan Michael, Samikwa Lyson, Simwanza James, Thomas Katherine K, Williams Steven A, Witek-McManus Stefan, Walson Judd L

机构信息

The Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

The DeWorm3 Project, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Centre of Public Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.

出版信息

Lancet. 2025 Aug 2;406(10502):475-488. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00766-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Soil-transmitted helminths are targeted for elimination as a public health problem. This study assessed whether, with high coverage, community-wide mass drug administration (MDA) could lead to transmission interruption.

METHODS

DeWorm3 is an open-label, community cluster-randomised controlled trial in Benin, India, and Malawi. In each country, a single governmental administrative unit (population ≥80 000 individuals) with soil-transmitted helminth endemicity and participation in at least five rounds of community-wide MDA for lymphatic filariasis, was divided into 40 clusters (population ≥1650 individuals), which were randomly assigned (1:1) to community-wide MDA versus school-based deworming. Laboratory personnel were masked to exposure status and all investigators were masked to post-baseline outcome data until unmasking. In all clusters, preschool-aged and school-aged children received school-based deworming as per national guidelines for 3 years. In intervention clusters, door-to-door community-wide MDA (a single oral dose of 400 mg albendazole) was delivered to all eligible individuals biannually by community drug distributors for 3 years. All individuals aged 12 months and older in India and Benin and aged 24 months and older in Malawi were eligible for treatment, except women in the first trimester of pregnancy, those with adverse reactions to benzimidazoles, those who were acutely ill or intoxicated, or those reporting treatment within the previous 2 weeks. The co-primary outcomes were individual-level prevalence and cluster-level transmission interruption (ie, weighted prevalence of predominant species of ≤2%) of the predominant soil-transmitted helminth species, assessed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) 24 months after the last round of MDA. The analysis set contained a subset of randomly selected participants per cluster who enrolled in the endline assessment, provided a stool sample, and had a qPCR result. All individuals who received treatment were eligible for inclusion in the safety population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03014167), and is active but not recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 10, 2017, and Feb 17, 2023, 120 clusters (40 clusters per country, comprising 357 716 individuals) were randomly assigned, 60 to community-wide MDA and 60 to school-based deworming. 184 030 (51·4%) individuals in the clusters at baseline were female, 173 663 (48·5%) were male, and 23 (<0·1%) were other. The analysis set consisted of 58 827 individuals in the control group and 58 554 in the intervention group 24 months after the cessation of all deworming, Necator americanus prevalence (the predominant species at all sites) in the community-wide MDA group was lower than the school-based deworming group in Benin (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 0·44 [95% CI 0·34-0·58]), India (0·41 [0·32-0·52]), and Malawi (0·40 [0·34-0·46]). Transmission interruption was achieved for N americanus in 11 (55%) of 20 intervention clusters versus six (30%) of 20 control clusters in Benin (p=0·20), in one (5%) intervention cluster versus no control clusters in India (p=1·00), and in no clusters in either group in Malawi (p=1·00). 984 adverse events were reported among 487 participants over the study, of which 32 among 13 participants resulted in hospitalisation and were classified as serious adverse events (three of which were related to study procedures).

INTERPRETATION

Soil-transmitted helminth transmission interruption might be possible in focal geographies but does not appear to be programmatically feasible within the evaluated timeframe. Community-wide MDA should be considered as an alternative strategy to school-based deworming programmes to improve equity and outcomes in helminth-endemic areas.

FUNDING

The Gates Foundation.

摘要

背景

土壤传播的蠕虫被列为需要消除的公共卫生问题。本研究评估了在高覆盖率的情况下,社区范围的大规模药物给药(MDA)是否能导致传播中断。

方法

DeWorm3是在贝宁、印度和马拉维进行的一项开放标签、社区整群随机对照试验。在每个国家,一个有土壤传播蠕虫流行且参与过至少五轮社区范围淋巴丝虫病MDA的单一政府行政单位(人口≥80000人)被分为40个群组(人口≥1650人),这些群组被随机分配(1:1)接受社区范围的MDA或基于学校的驱虫治疗。实验室人员对暴露状态不知情,所有研究者在基线后结果数据揭盲前对其不知情。在所有群组中,学龄前和学龄儿童按照国家指南接受基于学校的驱虫治疗,为期3年。在干预群组中,社区药物分发人员每半年为所有符合条件的个体进行一次社区范围的逐户MDA(单剂量口服400mg阿苯达唑),为期3年。在印度和贝宁,所有12个月及以上的个体以及在马拉维所有24个月及以上的个体有资格接受治疗,但怀孕头三个月的妇女、对苯并咪唑有不良反应者、急性病或中毒者,或在过去2周内报告接受过治疗者除外。共同主要结局是在最后一轮MDA后24个月通过定量PCR(qPCR)评估的主要土壤传播蠕虫种类的个体水平患病率和群组水平传播中断(即主要种类加权患病率≤2%)。分析集包含每个群组中随机选择的参与终末评估、提供粪便样本并获得qPCR结果的参与者子集。所有接受治疗的个体都有资格纳入安全性人群。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03014167),目前处于活跃状态但不再招募。

结果

在2017年10月10日至2023年2月17日期间,120个群组(每个国家40个群组,共357716人)被随机分配,60个接受社区范围的MDA,60个接受基于学校的驱虫治疗。基线时,群组中的184030名(51.4%)个体为女性,173663名(48.5%)为男性,23名(<0.1%)为其他性别。在所有驱虫治疗停止24个月后,分析集包括对照组的58827名个体和干预组的58554名个体。在贝宁,社区范围MDA组美洲板口线虫(所有地点的主要种类)患病率低于基于学校的驱虫治疗组(调整患病率比[aPR]0.44[95%CI 0.34 - 0.58]),在印度为0.41[0.32 - 0.52],在马拉维为0.40[0.34 - 0.46]。在贝宁,20个干预群组中有11个(55%)实现了美洲板口线虫的传播中断,而20个对照群组中有6个(30%)实现了传播中断(p = 0.20);在印度,1个(5%)干预群组实现了传播中断,而对照群组均未实现(p = 1.00);在马拉维,两组中均无群组实现传播中断(p = 1.00)。在研究期间,487名参与者报告了984起不良事件,其中13名参与者中的32起导致住院,被归类为严重不良事件(其中3起与研究程序有关)。

解读

在局部地区,土壤传播蠕虫的传播中断可能是可行的,但在评估的时间范围内似乎在方案上不可行。社区范围的MDA应被视为基于学校的驱虫计划的替代策略,以改善蠕虫流行地区的公平性和效果。

资金来源

盖茨基金会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验