Suppr超能文献

基于基因组分级指数的辅助化疗和激素疗法与单纯辅助激素疗法对比治疗70岁及以上高危乳腺癌女性(ASTER 70s):一项随机3期试验

Adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonotherapy versus adjuvant hormonotherapy alone for women aged 70 years and older with high-risk breast cancer based on the genomic grade index (ASTER 70s): a randomised phase 3 trial.

作者信息

Brain Etienne, Mir Olivier, Bourbouloux Emmanuelle, Rigal Olivier, Ferrero Jean-Marc, Kirscher Sylvie, Allouache Djelila, D'Hondt Véronique, Savoye Aude-Marie, Durando Xavier, Duhoux Francois P, Venat-Bouvet Laurence, Blot Emmanuel, Canon Jean-Luc, Rollot-Trad Florence, Bonnefoi Hervé, Roque Telma, Lemonnier Jérôme, Latouche Aurélien, Henriques Julie, Lacroix-Triki Magali, Vernerey Dewi

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Curie, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire des Cancers des Femmes (ANR-23-IAHU-0006), Paris, France; Inserm U1331, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France.

Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

Lancet. 2025 Aug 2;406(10502):489-500. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00832-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For women aged 70 years or older with oestrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, hormonotherapy is a standard adjuvant treatment, while the role of chemotherapy is debated. We aimed to assess the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival in these older patients with high-risk tumours according to a prognostic genomic signature.

METHODS

This phase 3, randomised, superiority study was conducted at 84 clinical sites in France and Belgium in women aged 70 years and older with oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative primary breast cancer or isolated local recurrence before any systemic treatment and after complete surgery. Genomic grade index (GGI) testing was done with a reverse-transcriptase PCR assay of eight genes on paraffin-embedded tumour tissue in a central laboratory. Patients with a GGI high-risk tumour were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive either four cycles of postoperative taxane-based or anthracycline-based chemotherapy given every 3 weeks followed by hormonotherapy (chemotherapy group) or hormonotherapy alone (no chemotherapy group). Randomisation was stratified according to the G8 screening tool score for geriatric frailty, nodal status, and centre. The primary endpoint was overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01564056) and is under active follow-up.

FINDINGS

Between April 12, 2012 and April 14, 2016, 1969 patients were screened for GGI, of whom 1089 had a GGI high-risk tumour and were randomly allocated to the chemotherapy group (n=541) or the no chemotherapy group (n=548). Median age was 75·1 years (IQR 72·5 to 78·7) and geriatric frailty (G8 score ≤14) was identified in 437 patients (40%) patients. With a median follow-up time of 7·8 years (95% CI 7·5 to 7·8), overall survival rates were 90·5% (95% CI 87·6 to 92·8) at 4 years and 72·7% (67·8 to 77·0) at 8 years in the chemotherapy group, and 89·3% (86·2 to 91·6) at 4 years and 68·3% (63·3 to 72·7) at 8 years in the no chemotherapy group (stratified log-rank p=0·2100; hazard ratio 0·83 [95% CI 0·63 to 1·11]), yielding statistically non-significant absolute differences in survival probability of 1·3 percentage points (95% CI -2·4 to 5·0) at 4 years and 4·5% (95% CI -2·1 to 11·1) at 8 years. Safety analysis favoured the no chemotherapy group: at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event occurred in 52 (9%) of 548 patients in the no chemotherapy group (including one death not related to treatment), compared with 183 (34%) of 541 patients in the chemotherapy group (including three deaths, of which one was related to treatment).

INTERPRETATION

The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to hormonotherapy conferred no survival benefit in women aged 70 years and above with a GGI high-risk oestrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, and was associated with more adverse events, providing important data on the benefit-risk balance of adding adjuvant chemotherapy to adjuvant hormonotherapy in this older age group.

FUNDING

Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (PHRC National Cancer 2011), Cephalon, Amgen, Ipsogen, Association d'Aide à la Recherche Cancérologique de Saint-Cloud, and Ligue Contre le Cancer.

摘要

背景

对于70岁及以上雌激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性的浸润性乳腺癌女性患者,激素疗法是标准的辅助治疗方法,而化疗的作用仍存在争议。我们旨在根据预后基因组特征评估辅助化疗对这些高危肿瘤老年患者总生存期的影响。

方法

这项3期随机优效性研究在法国和比利时的84个临床地点开展,纳入70岁及以上、雌激素受体阳性且人表皮生长因子受体2阴性的原发性乳腺癌或在任何全身治疗前及完全手术后出现孤立性局部复发的女性患者。在中央实验室,采用逆转录聚合酶链反应检测法对石蜡包埋肿瘤组织中的8个基因进行基因组分级指数(GGI)检测。GGI高危肿瘤患者被随机分配(1:1)接受每3周一次的4周期术后紫杉烷类或蒽环类化疗,随后进行激素疗法(化疗组)或仅接受激素疗法(无化疗组)。随机分组根据老年衰弱的G8筛查工具评分、淋巴结状态和中心进行分层。主要终点是总生存期。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT01564056),目前正在积极随访中。

结果

2012年4月12日至2016年4月14日期间,1969例患者接受了GGI检测,其中1089例为GGI高危肿瘤患者,被随机分配至化疗组(n = 541)或无化疗组(n = 548)。中位年龄为75.1岁(四分位间距72.5至78.7),437例(40%)患者存在老年衰弱(G8评分≤l4)。中位随访时间为7.8年(95%CI 7.5至7.8),化疗组4年总生存率为90.5%(95%CI 87.6至92.8),8年为72.7%(67.8至77.0);无化疗组4年总生存率为89.3%(86.2至91.6),8年为68.3%(63.3至72.7)(分层对数秩检验p = 0.2100;风险比0.83 [95%CI 0.63至1.11]),4年生存概率的绝对差异为1.3个百分点(95%CI -2.4至5.0),8年为4.5%(95%CI -2.1至11.1),差异无统计学意义。安全性分析显示无化疗组更具优势:无化疗组548例患者中有52例(9%)发生至少1次3级或更高等级不良事件(包括1例与治疗无关的死亡),而化疗组541例患者中有183例(34%)发生(包括3例死亡,其中1例与治疗相关)。

解读

对于70岁及以上GGI高危雌激素受体阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌女性患者,在激素疗法基础上加用辅助化疗未带来生存获益,且与更多不良事件相关,为该老年人群辅助激素疗法加用辅助化疗的获益 - 风险平衡提供了重要数据。

资助

临床研究医院项目(PHRC国家癌症2011)、Cephalon公司、安进公司、Ipsogen公司、圣克卢癌症研究援助协会以及法国抗癌联盟。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验