Suppr超能文献

腹横肌平面阻滞(TAP)与硬膜外镇痛用于腹部手术的比较效果:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析

Comparative Effectiveness of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block and Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Naim Nusratun, Reza Md Selim, Umar Anwar

机构信息

General Surgery, James Paget University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Coventry, GBR.

General (Internal) Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jul 2;17(7):e87167. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87167. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) are commonly used techniques for managing postoperative pain following abdominal surgery. While TEA has traditionally been the gold standard, TAP block has emerged as a simpler, potentially safer alternative. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of TAP block versus TEA across multiple postoperative outcomes in abdominal surgery. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared TAP block and TEA in adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Primary outcomes included pain scores at rest and during coughing at 24 and 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included postoperative opioid consumption, incidence of hypotension, time to pass first flatus, and hospital stay. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the ² statistic. Eight RCTs were included. Pain scores at rest at 24 hours showed no significant difference between TAP and TEA (mean difference [MD] = 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.52 to 1.03, = 0.51; ² = 99%), as did pain scores during coughing at 24 hours (MD = 0.39, 95% CI: -0.16 to 0.94, = 0.16; ² = 98%). At 48 hours, pain at rest remained similar (MD = 0.22, 95% CI: -0.40 to 0.85, = = 0.48; ²² = 99%), while TEA showed a modest benefit during coughing (MD = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.02-1.21, = 0.04; ² = 99%). TEA significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption compared to TAP (MD = 8.79 mg morphine equivalent, 95% CI: 1.82-15.76, = 0.01; ² = 82%). However, the TAP block was associated with a significantly lower risk of hypotension (risk ratio [RR] = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.01-0.40, = 0.002; ² = 0%). No significant difference was found in time passing first flatus (MD = 4.19 hours, 95% CI: -5.22 to 13.60, = 0.39; ² = 96%) or length of hospital stay (MD = -0.32 days, 95% CI: -1.24 to 0.60, = 0.50; ² = 79%). TAP block provides analgesia comparable to TEA for postoperative pain at rest, with fewer hemodynamic side effects. Although TEA offers advantages in reducing opioid requirements and cough-related pain at 48 hours, its higher risk of hypotension limits its suitability in certain patients. TAP block represents an effective and safer alternative in abdominal surgical settings, particularly when TEA is contraindicated or poses a higher risk.

摘要

腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞和胸段硬膜外镇痛(TEA)是腹部手术后管理术后疼痛的常用技术。虽然传统上TEA一直是金标准,但TAP阻滞已成为一种更简单、可能更安全的替代方法。这项荟萃分析比较了TAP阻滞与TEA在腹部手术多个术后结局方面的疗效和安全性。在PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL和Scopus中进行了系统的文献检索,以确定比较TAP阻滞和TEA在接受腹部手术的成年患者中的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局包括术后24小时和48小时静息及咳嗽时的疼痛评分。次要结局包括术后阿片类药物消耗量、低血压发生率、首次排气时间和住院时间。使用随机效应模型合成数据,并使用I²统计量评估异质性。纳入了8项RCT。24小时静息时的疼痛评分在TAP阻滞和TEA之间无显著差异(平均差[MD]=0.26,95%置信区间[CI]:-0.52至1.03,P=0.51;I²=99%),24小时咳嗽时的疼痛评分也是如此(MD=0.39,95%CI:-0.16至0.94,P=0.16;I²=98%)。在48小时时,静息时的疼痛仍相似(MD=0.22,95%CI:-0.40至0.85,P=0.48;I²=99%),而TEA在咳嗽时显示出适度益处(MD=0.62,95%CI:0.02-1.21,P=0.04;I²=99%)。与TAP阻滞相比,TEA显著降低了术后阿片类药物消耗量(MD=8.79毫克吗啡当量,95%CI:1.82-15.76,P=0.01;I²=82%)。然而,TAP阻滞与显著更低的低血压风险相关(风险比[RR]=0.08,95%CI:0.01-0.40,P=0.002;I²=0%)。首次排气时间(MD=4.19小时,95%CI:-5.22至13.60,P=0.39;I²=96%)或住院时间(MD=-0.32天,95%CI:-1.24至0.60,P=0.50;I²=79%)未发现显著差异。TAP阻滞为术后静息疼痛提供了与TEA相当的镇痛效果,且血流动力学副作用更少。虽然TEA在48小时时在减少阿片类药物需求和咳嗽相关疼痛方面具有优势,但其更高的低血压风险限制了其在某些患者中的适用性。TAP阻滞在腹部手术环境中是一种有效且更安全的替代方法,特别是当TEA禁忌或风险更高时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/123b/12315932/725e8358c32b/cureus-0017-00000087167-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验