• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童经脐单部位双孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术。单中心经验报告并与三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术对比

Transumbilical single-site double-port laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Report of a single center experience with comparison with three-port laparoscopic appendectomy.

作者信息

Qin Hong, Liu Hongzhen, Xia Tian, Tang Bingqiang, Zhang Shisong, Wang Lulu

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Children's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Department of Endocrinology, Jinan Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Front Pediatr. 2025 Jul 18;13:1541702. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1541702. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fped.2025.1541702
PMID:40755913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12313689/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Transumbilical single-site double-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TSSDPLA) represents an innovative and minimally invasive approach for managing acute appendicitis. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of TSSDPLA vs. three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TPLA) in a pediatric series.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted between July 2023 and July 2024 at the Department of General Surgery, Children's Hospital affiliated to Shandong University. The patients were categorized into two groups: the TSSDPLA group and the TPLA group. Outcomes including patient demographics, leukocyte count upon arrival, duration of the operation, costs associated with the operating room, and any complications encountered.

RESULTS

The results indicated no significant differences between the TSSDPLA and TPLA groups in terms of age, gender, leukocyte counts, liquid diet, length of hospital stay, pathology or complications. However, the mean operating room costs were significantly lower in the TSSDPLA group ( < 0.001). Additionally, the mean operation time for the TSSDPLA group was marginally longer compared to the TPLA group.

CONCLUSIONS

TSSDPLA is a reliable technical technique for the management of acute appendicitis. This approach offers several advantages, including improved cosmetic outcomes, reduced surgical trauma, and lower costs.

摘要

目的

经脐单部位双孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(TSSDPLA)是一种用于治疗急性阑尾炎的创新且微创的方法。本研究旨在比较小儿系列中TSSDPLA与三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(TPLA)的临床结果。

方法

于2023年7月至2024年7月在山东大学附属儿童医院普通外科进行回顾性分析。将患者分为两组:TSSDPLA组和TPLA组。观察指标包括患者人口统计学资料、入院时白细胞计数、手术时长、手术室相关费用以及任何术中并发症。

结果

结果表明,TSSDPLA组和TPLA组在年龄、性别、白细胞计数、流食情况、住院时间、病理或并发症方面无显著差异。然而,TSSDPLA组的平均手术室费用显著更低(<0.001)。此外,TSSDPLA组的平均手术时间比TPLA组略长。

结论

TSSDPLA是一种治疗急性阑尾炎的可靠技术。该方法具有多种优势,包括改善美容效果、减少手术创伤和降低成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5232/12313689/73b8e6c95eb6/fped-13-1541702-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5232/12313689/a13e9fc0172e/fped-13-1541702-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5232/12313689/73b8e6c95eb6/fped-13-1541702-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5232/12313689/a13e9fc0172e/fped-13-1541702-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5232/12313689/73b8e6c95eb6/fped-13-1541702-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Transumbilical single-site double-port laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Report of a single center experience with comparison with three-port laparoscopic appendectomy.儿童经脐单部位双孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术。单中心经验报告并与三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术对比
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jul 18;13:1541702. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1541702. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULAA) vs conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (CTLA) in the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.小儿经脐腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术(TULAA)与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CTLA)的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 25;184(7):445. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06286-3.
3
Single-incision versus conventional multi-incision laparoscopic appendicectomy for suspected uncomplicated appendicitis.单切口与传统多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗疑似单纯性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 5;11(11):CD009022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009022.pub3.
4
Abdominal drainage to prevent intraperitoneal abscess after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.阑尾切除术后放置腹腔引流以预防复杂性阑尾炎术后腹腔脓肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 11;4(4):CD010168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub5.
5
Feasibility of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy for retrocecal appendicitis: A propensity score-matched study with multi-port laparoscopic appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗盲肠后位阑尾炎的可行性:一项与多孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的倾向评分匹配研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):105925. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.105925.
6
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.成人单孔与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Apr;77(2):287-296. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02112-5. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
7
Single-incision versus three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单切口与三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):822-43. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3735-z. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
8
Single incision laparoscopic appendectomy with surgical-glove port is cost-effective and reliable in complicated acute appendicitis: A casecontrol multicenter study in Colombia.采用手术手套端口的单切口腹腔镜阑尾切除术在复杂性急性阑尾炎中具有成本效益且可靠:哥伦比亚的一项病例对照多中心研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 19;9(1):e12972. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12972. eCollection 2023 Jan.
9
The Safety and Feasibility of Single-Stage Versus Staged Laparoscopic Approach for Acute Appendicitis with Inguinal Hernia in Pediatric Patients: A Comparative Study.小儿急性阑尾炎合并腹股沟疝单阶段与分期腹腔镜手术入路的安全性和可行性:一项对比研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 14;14(12):4243. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124243.
10
Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗急性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 29;4(4):CD015038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015038.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Inferior Epigastric Artery Pseudoaneurysm Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术后下腹部动脉假性动脉瘤。
Am Surg. 2023 Sep;89(9):3977-3978. doi: 10.1177/00031348231161682. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
2
Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy <em>versus</em> laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a single center experience.经脐腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术与小儿腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:单中心经验
Pediatr Med Chir. 2023 Apr 27;45(1). doi: 10.4081/pmc.2023.306.
3
Diagnosis and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Adults: A Review.
成人急性阑尾炎的诊断与管理:综述
JAMA. 2021 Dec 14;326(22):2299-2311. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20502.
4
Comparison of Handmade Endoloop Versus Polymeric Endoclip for Stump Closure in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.腹腔镜阑尾切除术中手工 Endoloop 与聚合物 Endoclip 用于残端闭合的比较。
Cureus. 2021 Jul 10;13(7):e16302. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16302. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Neuropathic inguinal pain due to nerve injury after a laparoscopic appendectomy: first pediatric case described in the literature.腹腔镜阑尾切除术后神经损伤所致的神经性腹股沟疼痛:文献中描述的首例儿科病例。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2021 Jun;37(6):1825-1830. doi: 10.1007/s00381-021-05177-w. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
6
Cost analysis of laparoscopic appendectomy in a large integrated healthcare system.在大型综合医疗体系中腹腔镜阑尾切除术的成本分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):800-807. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08266-0. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
7
Laparoscopic Traction Device for Assistance of 2-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy.用于辅助两孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的腹腔镜牵引装置
Am Surg. 2021 Sep;87(9):1511-1513. doi: 10.1177/0003134820920221. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
8
Acute Appendicitis Review: Background, Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.急性阑尾炎综述:背景、流行病学、诊断与治疗
Cureus. 2020 Jun 11;12(6):e8562. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8562.
9
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.急性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗:WSES 耶路撒冷指南 2020 年更新版。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.
10
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗疑似阑尾炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 28;11(11):CD001546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub4.