Mevi Roberto, Cabizosu Alessio
THERMHESC Group, Chair of Ribera Hospital de Molina San Antonio, Catholic University of Murcia (UCAM), 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Muscles. 2024 Oct 18;3(4):349-363. doi: 10.3390/muscles3040030.
INTRODUCTION: The physiological response of the tendon structure has been the subject of several studies using clinical thermography, although the lack of normal values limits clinical practice despite being, according to several authors, an optimal diagnostic tool for the study and therapeutic monitoring of soft tissues. To this end, the aim of this systematic review was to explore all the scientific information on thermography and reference values in the patellar tendon. METHOD: A search was carried out in different health science databases using the MeSH terms "Health", "Patellar Ligament", and "Thermography" with their synonyms in free terms to collect the studies to be included in the systematic review. This review was conducted according with PRISMA guidelines and includes all of the literature up to 19 December 2023. All studies that were in accordance with the PICOS strategy in title and abstract were included in this review, while studies that performed the baseline thermographic test in an altered physiological state were excluded after reading the full text. The TISEM scale was used to assess the quality of the studies; the risk of bias was assessed with the QUADAS-2 scale. RESULT: A total of 6 articles was selected (n = 148); these were analyzed for quality and found to be highly heterogenous; the risk of bias was low in most domains of the QUADAS-2 scale. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: There are several variabilities that can induce changes in the thermoregulation process distorting the thermograms. Looking deeper into the evidence behind each item, we can deduce the need to follow the TISEM protocol as closely as possible for an accurate response. The heterogeneity in the way the results were provided and the low quality in some of the studies did not allow for a reference of thermographic values to be obtained.
引言:尽管缺乏正常值限制了临床应用,但根据一些作者的说法,临床热成像技术仍是研究和监测软组织治疗的最佳诊断工具,因此肌腱结构的生理反应已成为多项使用临床热成像技术的研究主题。为此,本系统评价的目的是探索关于髌腱热成像和参考值的所有科学信息。 方法:在不同的健康科学数据库中进行检索,使用医学主题词“健康”“髌韧带”和“热成像”及其同义词作为自由词,以收集纳入系统评价的研究。本评价按照PRISMA指南进行,纳入截至2023年12月19日的所有文献。所有标题和摘要符合PICOS策略的研究均纳入本评价,而在阅读全文后排除在生理状态改变时进行基线热成像测试的研究。使用TISEM量表评估研究质量;使用QUADAS - 2量表评估偏倚风险。 结果:共筛选出6篇文章(n = 148);对这些文章进行质量分析,发现它们具有高度异质性;在QUADAS - 2量表的大多数领域中,偏倚风险较低。 讨论与结论:有多种变异性可导致体温调节过程发生变化,从而使热成像图失真。深入研究每个项目背后的证据,我们可以推断出需要尽可能严格遵循TISEM方案以获得准确的结果。结果呈现方式的异质性以及一些研究的低质量使得无法获得热成像值的参考标准。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-6-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-6-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Health Technol Assess. 2001
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-11-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Sports Med Int Open. 2024-1-8
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023-6-1
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023-2-21
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023-3-1
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023-5