Reysner Tomasz, Wieczorowska-Tobis Katarzyna, Kowalski Grzegorz, Grochowicka Monika, Pyszczorska Monika, Mularski Aleksander, Reysner Malgorzata
Department of Palliative Medicine Poznan, University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznań, Poland.
Department of Forensic Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, 65-417 Zielona Góra, Poland.
Reports (MDPI). 2024 Nov 2;7(4):89. doi: 10.3390/reports7040089.
The systemic stress response to surgery is a complex physiological process characterized by neuroendocrine, sympathetic, and inflammatory activation. While necessary for survival, this response can lead to adverse outcomes such as hyperglycemia, immune suppression, cardiovascular complications, and delayed recovery. Regional anesthesia (RA) has been shown to modulate this stress response more effectively than general anesthesia (GA) by blocking nociceptive signaling and attenuating the release of stress mediators. This review aims to elucidate how RA influences the systemic stress response, highlighting its clinical benefits in reducing postoperative pain, improving hemodynamic stability, minimizing inflammatory responses, and preserving immune function. Additionally, this review examines evidence from clinical trials supporting using RA to improve surgical outcomes, particularly in high-risk populations. A comprehensive narrative review of the literature was conducted to explore the physiological impact of RA on the systemic stress response and its associated clinical outcomes. Studies comparing RA to GA across various surgical procedures were evaluated, focusing on neuroendocrine modulation, sympathetic inhibition, inflammatory attenuation, and the implications for pain management, cardiovascular and pulmonary function, and immune preservation. RA significantly attenuates the neuroendocrine response by reducing the release of cortisol and catecholamines, thereby improving hemodynamic stability and reducing myocardial oxygen consumption. RA also inhibits the sympathetic nervous system, leading to improved cardiovascular outcomes. Furthermore, RA mitigates the inflammatory response by reducing pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, reducing the risk of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, and pulmonary complications. Clinical studies and meta-analyses consistently demonstrate that RA reduces postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and the incidence of cardiovascular and pulmonary complications, particularly in elderly and high-risk patients. RA offers a significant advantage in modulating the systemic stress response to surgery, improving postoperative outcomes by reducing pain, enhancing cardiovascular stability, and preserving immune function. Its benefits are particularly pronounced in high-risk populations such as the elderly or those with pre-existing comorbidities. Given the growing evidence supporting its efficacy, RA should be considered a critical component of multimodal perioperative care strategies aimed at minimizing the systemic stress response and improving recovery. Future research should optimize RA techniques and identify patient-specific factors to enhance therapeutic benefits.
手术的全身应激反应是一个复杂的生理过程,其特征为神经内分泌、交感神经和炎症激活。虽然这种反应对生存是必要的,但它可能导致不良后果,如高血糖、免疫抑制、心血管并发症和恢复延迟。区域麻醉(RA)已被证明比全身麻醉(GA)更有效地调节这种应激反应,通过阻断伤害性信号传导和减弱应激介质的释放。本综述旨在阐明RA如何影响全身应激反应,强调其在减轻术后疼痛、改善血流动力学稳定性、最小化炎症反应和维持免疫功能方面的临床益处。此外,本综述审查了来自临床试验的证据,支持使用RA改善手术结果,特别是在高危人群中。对文献进行了全面的叙述性综述,以探讨RA对全身应激反应及其相关临床结果的生理影响。评估了在各种手术中比较RA与GA的研究,重点关注神经内分泌调节、交感神经抑制、炎症减轻以及对疼痛管理、心血管和肺功能以及免疫维持的影响。RA通过减少皮质醇和儿茶酚胺的释放显著减弱神经内分泌反应,从而改善血流动力学稳定性并减少心肌氧消耗。RA还抑制交感神经系统,导致改善心血管结果。此外,RA通过降低促炎细胞因子水平减轻炎症反应,降低全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、败血症和肺部并发症的风险。临床研究和荟萃分析一致表明,RA可减轻术后疼痛、减少阿片类药物消耗以及降低心血管和肺部并发症的发生率,特别是在老年和高危患者中。RA在调节手术的全身应激反应方面具有显著优势,通过减轻疼痛、增强心血管稳定性和维持免疫功能来改善术后结果。其益处在老年或患有既往合并症等高危人群中尤为明显。鉴于支持其疗效的证据不断增加,RA应被视为多模式围手术期护理策略的关键组成部分,旨在最小化全身应激反应并促进恢复。未来的研究应优化RA技术并确定患者特异性因素以增强治疗益处。