Nicholson Bridget, Moraitis Ann Marie, Cawley Keiko, Wong Bob, Echeverria Christina, Mooney Kathi
University of Utah, 10 S 200 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
University of Rhode Island,, 350 Eddy Street,, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Aug 4;33(8):747. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09782-2.
P atients undergoing systemic cancer therapy still experience significant symptom burden. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) monitoring and follow-up of symptoms has improved suffering, but limited work has explored combined subjective and objective measures. This secondary analysis explored the relationship between oncology symptoms and step count using the Symptom Care at Home (SCH) digital monitoring platform.
Participants reported 11 disease and treatment symptoms: fatigue, trouble sleeping, nausea and vomiting, pain, numbness or tingling, depressed mood, feeling nervous or anxious, trouble breathing, diarrhea, sore mouth, and trouble thinking or concentrating via ePRO and independently reported step count via Garmin activity monitors. Analysis included descriptive statistics and linear mixed-effect models to examine the relationship between symptom burden and step count.
Of participants who provided Garmin activity monitors (n = 339), 18-5 (54%) reported ePRO symptoms and step counts. A mean 76.56 days of step count and 56 days of ePRO were reported. The mean step count was 3164.34 (SD = 2370.28). Using a scale of 0-10, our results indicate that a 1-point increase in total symptom severity burden is associated with a decrease of approximately 46 daily steps (B = - 45.94, p < 0.001). Individual symptom analysis found that a one-point symptom increase corresponded with a 165-step count decrease with a one-point increase in fatigue (B = - 165.33, p < 0.001), a 107-step decrease with increased nausea and vomiting (B = - 107.49, p < 0.001), and a 28-step reduction in pain.
This study demonstrates a relationship between ePRO and step count in patients undergoing systemic cancer treatment across diagnoses. Notably, fatigue was the most prevalent symptom impacting activity, even more prevalent than nausea, vomiting, and pain. This secondary analysis reflects the potential for utilizing combined reporting measures such as ePRO and step count to increase symptom reporting and clinical response for patients undergoing systemic cancer treatment.
接受全身性癌症治疗的患者仍承受着巨大的症状负担。电子患者报告结局(ePRO)对症状的监测和随访改善了患者的痛苦,但很少有研究探索主观和客观测量相结合的方法。这项二次分析使用居家症状护理(SCH)数字监测平台探讨了肿瘤症状与步数之间的关系。
参与者报告了11种疾病和治疗症状:疲劳、睡眠障碍、恶心和呕吐、疼痛、麻木或刺痛、情绪低落、感到紧张或焦虑、呼吸困难、腹泻、口腔疼痛以及思维或注意力不集中,通过ePRO进行报告,并通过佳明活动监测器独立报告步数。分析包括描述性统计和线性混合效应模型,以检验症状负担与步数之间的关系。
在提供佳明活动监测器的参与者中(n = 339),185名(54%)报告了ePRO症状和步数。报告的平均步数记录天数为76.56天,ePRO记录天数为56天。平均步数为3164.34(标准差=2370.28)。使用0至10分的量表,我们的结果表明,总症状严重程度负担每增加1分,每日步数约减少46步(B = -45.94,p < 0.001)。个体症状分析发现,症状每增加1分,步数相应减少165步,疲劳程度增加1分(B = -165.33,p < 0.001),恶心和呕吐增加时步数减少107步(B = -107.49,p < 0.001),疼痛时步数减少28步。
本研究证明了在接受全身性癌症治疗的不同诊断患者中,ePRO与步数之间存在关联。值得注意的是,疲劳是影响活动的最普遍症状,甚至比恶心、呕吐和疼痛更普遍。这项二次分析反映了利用ePRO和步数等综合报告措施来增加接受全身性癌症治疗患者的症状报告和临床反应的潜力。