Pinto Marco Antônio Leite Pereira, Pinto Giovanna Truyts Biscardi, Ude Mariana Afonso Ribeiro Sarquis, de Morais Claudia Aparecida, Ribeiro Ana Paula
School of Medicine, Health Science Post-Graduate Department, Biomechanics and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Laboratory, University Santo Amaro, São Paulo, R. Prof. Enéas de Siqueira Neto, 340, Campus I, 04829-900, SP, Brazil.
Geriatric Surgery Department, Grajaú General Hospital, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Aug 4;25(1):586. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05968-9.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a surgery widely used to reduce pain, improve function and quality of life in older people after femur fracture due to osteoporosis. The evident success of THA, especially in the long term, continues in relation to the different types of surgical approach, given the little understanding in older people. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of THA between two surgical access routes, anterior and posterolateral, on the clinical, functional, and biomechanical parameters of older people after osteoporotic femur fracture.
Prospective and retrospective cohort study, in which 24 older people with femur fracture, who underwent THA in a Public Hospital, between the years 2020 and 2022, were evaluated. The older people were divided into two groups: THA via anterolateral surgical (n = 12) and THA via posterolateral surgery (n = 12). The following clinical information was collected from the patients' records. After the surgery, pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale and function by the Harris Hip Score questionnaire, as well as hip and knee mobility (goniometer). For the radiographic parameters, acetabular component positioning, De Lee Zone, and the offset of the femoro-acetabular component were evaluated. A pressure platform was used for the biomechanical assessment of gait and balance.
Older adults who underwent THA via the posterolateral route showed a reduction in chronic pain (p = 0.001), and greater functionality (p = 0.001), joint mobility of the hip (flexion and extension, p = < 0,001) and knee (extension) when compared to THA via the anterolateral. In relation to the gait, a reduction in plantar overload on the forefoot (peak pressure p = 0.007) and medial and lateral rearfoot areas (peak pressure p = 0.004 and p = 0.009, respectively; maximum force p = 0.021 and p = 0.015 respectively;) was observed, as well as a reduction in the contact area on the forefoot (p = 0.001) in older people who underwent THA by the posterolateral when compared to the anterolateral. An increase in body sway (p = 0.002) and medio-lateral sway (p = 0.020) was observed in older adults who underwent THA using the posterolateral route when compared to the anterolateral route, such as distance and velocity balance (p = 0.001).
Total hip arthroplasty via the posterolateral approach proved to be more successful when associated with reducing chronic pain, improving functional parameters and hip joint mobility, as well as facilitating a more efficient gait pattern with lower rates of plantar overload and enhanced body balance in older adults undergoing total hip arthroplasty after osteoporotic femur fracture. These findings are clinically relevant as they indicate that this approach not only provides significant pain relief but also improves the patients' quality of life by restoring hip functionality and mobility, while reducing the risk of falls and complications related to postural imbalance. The combination of these benefits suggests that the posterolateral approach could be a preferred option for elderly patients with osteoporotic fractures, aiming to optimize postoperative outcomes and improve long-term functional recovery.
全髋关节置换术(THA)是一种广泛应用于减轻骨质疏松导致股骨骨折的老年人疼痛、改善功能和生活质量的手术。鉴于老年人对此了解甚少,THA在不同手术入路方式下均取得了显著成功,尤其是从长期来看。本研究的目的是评估和比较全髋关节置换术两种手术入路——前路和后外侧入路——对骨质疏松性股骨骨折老年人的临床、功能和生物力学参数的影响。
前瞻性和回顾性队列研究,评估了2020年至2022年间在一家公立医院接受全髋关节置换术的24例股骨骨折老年人。这些老年人被分为两组:前外侧手术全髋关节置换术组(n = 12)和后外侧手术全髋关节置换术组(n = 12)。从患者记录中收集以下临床信息。手术后,使用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛,通过Harris髋关节评分问卷评估功能,以及使用测角器评估髋关节和膝关节活动度。对于影像学参数,评估髋臼组件位置、De Lee区以及股骨髋臼组件的偏移。使用压力平台对步态和平衡进行生物力学评估。
与前外侧入路全髋关节置换术相比,后外侧入路全髋关节置换术的老年人慢性疼痛减轻(p = 0.001),功能更强(p = 0.001),髋关节(屈伸,p = <0.001)和膝关节(伸展)的关节活动度更大。在步态方面,与前外侧入路相比,后外侧入路全髋关节置换术的老年人前足跖侧超负荷减轻(峰值压力p = 0.007),后足内侧和外侧区域(峰值压力分别为p = 0.004和p = 0.009;最大力分别为p = 0.021和p = 0.015),前足接触面积减小(p = 0.001)。与前外侧入路相比,后外侧入路全髋关节置换术的老年人身体摇摆增加(p = 0.002)和中外侧摇摆增加(p = 0.020),如距离和速度平衡(p = 0.001)。
对于接受骨质疏松性股骨骨折后全髋关节置换术的老年人,后外侧入路全髋关节置换术在减轻慢性疼痛、改善功能参数和髋关节活动度以及促进更有效的步态模式方面更为成功,足底超负荷率更低,身体平衡增强。这些发现具有临床相关性,因为它们表明这种方法不仅能显著缓解疼痛,还能通过恢复髋关节功能和活动度来提高患者的生活质量,同时降低跌倒风险和与姿势失衡相关的并发症。这些益处的综合表明,后外侧入路可能是骨质疏松性骨折老年患者的首选方案,旨在优化术后结果并改善长期功能恢复。