• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性咳嗽的十大优先事项:加拿大詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目(CAN-COUGH)

Top 10 priorities for chronic cough: Canadian James Lind Alliance Priority-Setting Partnership (CAN-COUGH).

作者信息

Samari Saif, Oliveira Ana, Brister Danica, Kum Elena, Aaron Shawn D, Adamko Darryl, Bhalla Anurag, Carlsten Christopher, Cormier Maxime, Ellis Anne K, Field Stephen K, Godbout Krystelle, Hernandez Paul, Hirota Jeremy A, Kaplan Alan, Kovesi Tom, Mancopes Renata, Sedeno Maria, Smith Maeve, Newman Robert, King Philip, Gallagher Tiffany, Butson Sarah, Brooks Dina, Satia Imran

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Joint first co-authors.

出版信息

ERJ Open Res. 2025 Aug 4;11(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.01370-2024. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:
10.1183/23120541.01370-2024
PMID:40761655
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12320103/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic cough significantly impacts individuals' quality of life and poses challenges for healthcare providers due to limited licensed treatments, side effects of available medications and difficulty accessing nonpharmacological interventions. Understanding priorities for research, education and knowledge dissemination from the perspectives of individuals with chronic cough and healthcare providers can guide future efforts. This study aimed to identify these key priorities in Canada.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study using the James Lind Alliance (JLA) method to set priorities. Chronic cough was identified as the healthcare problem. Participants rated items related to research, education and knowledge dissemination in an online survey using a seven-point Likert scale. Results of the survey were reviewed by the Canadian Thoracic Society's (CTS) multidisciplinary working group and patient partners who engaged in a face-to-face Priority-Setting Partnership, to establish a "Top 10" priorities list for chronic cough.

RESULTS

74 individuals with chronic cough and 62 healthcare providers completed the scoping survey. The top-rated priorities included enhancing knowledge of existing treatments, developing new treatments and improving diagnostic testing. The final "Top 10" priorities list emphasised the need for developing infrastructure for evaluating new treatments, improving understanding of biological mechanisms and raising awareness among the public and policymakers.

CONCLUSION

This is the first priority-setting project for chronic cough, highlighting key areas to address in research, education and dissemination. The identified priorities will serve as a foundation for future efforts to improve the management and care of individuals with chronic cough.

摘要

背景

慢性咳嗽严重影响个人生活质量,且由于获批治疗方法有限、现有药物存在副作用以及难以获得非药物干预措施,给医疗服务提供者带来了挑战。从慢性咳嗽患者和医疗服务提供者的角度了解研究、教育和知识传播的优先事项,可为未来的工作提供指导。本研究旨在确定加拿大的这些关键优先事项。

研究设计与方法

我们采用詹姆斯·林德联盟(JLA)方法进行了一项横断面研究以确定优先事项。慢性咳嗽被确定为医疗问题。参与者在一项在线调查中使用七点李克特量表对与研究、教育和知识传播相关的项目进行评分。加拿大胸科学会(CTS)的多学科工作组和患者合作伙伴对调查结果进行了审查,他们参与了面对面的优先事项确定合作,以建立慢性咳嗽的“十大”优先事项清单。

结果

74名慢性咳嗽患者和62名医疗服务提供者完成了范围界定调查。排名最高的优先事项包括增强对现有治疗方法的了解、开发新的治疗方法以及改进诊断测试。最终的“十大”优先事项清单强调了建立评估新治疗方法的基础设施、增进对生物学机制的理解以及提高公众和政策制定者意识的必要性。

结论

这是首个针对慢性咳嗽的优先事项确定项目,突出了研究、教育和传播中需要解决的关键领域。确定的优先事项将为未来改善慢性咳嗽患者的管理和护理工作奠定基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ee/12320103/57a08807bd00/01370-2024.04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ee/12320103/c08018c89a0c/01370-2024.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ee/12320103/80fbf5f614ca/01370-2024.02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ee/12320103/b8bb36143051/01370-2024.03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ee/12320103/57a08807bd00/01370-2024.04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ee/12320103/c08018c89a0c/01370-2024.01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ee/12320103/80fbf5f614ca/01370-2024.02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ee/12320103/b8bb36143051/01370-2024.03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ee/12320103/57a08807bd00/01370-2024.04.jpg

相似文献

1
Top 10 priorities for chronic cough: Canadian James Lind Alliance Priority-Setting Partnership (CAN-COUGH).慢性咳嗽的十大优先事项:加拿大詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目(CAN-COUGH)
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Aug 4;11(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.01370-2024. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Identifying Common Patient-Oriented Priorities for Child and Adolescent Health Research and Care: A Systematic Review of Priority Setting Partnerships.确定儿童和青少年健康研究与照护中以患者为导向的常见优先事项:优先事项设定伙伴关系的系统评价
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70349. doi: 10.1111/hex.70349.
3
Research priorities for faecal incontinence in adults: A James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership.成人粪便失禁的研究重点:詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目
Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jul;27(7):e70154. doi: 10.1111/codi.70154.
4
People powered research: what do communities identify as important for happy and healthy children and young people? A multi-disciplinary community research priority setting exercise in the City of Bradford, United Kingdom (UK).民众推动的研究:社区认为哪些因素对儿童和青少年的快乐和健康重要?英国布拉德福德市的一项多学科社区研究重点制定工作。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Apr 25;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01881-y.
5
The Midlands Liver Research Alliance - A partnership to optimise obesity-related liver disease research: targeting areas of high incidence and underserved communities.中部地区肝脏研究联盟——优化肥胖相关肝病研究的合作伙伴关系:针对高发病地区和服务不足的社区。
NIHR Open Res. 2024 Dec 12;4:75. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13784.1. eCollection 2024.
6
Top 10 research priorities for digital technology for adolescents and young persons with inflammatory bowel disease: Results of a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.青少年和年轻炎症性肠病患者数字技术研究重点 10 项:詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系的结果。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2024 Mar;78(3):670-676. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.12105. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
7
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
8
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
9
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.

引用本文的文献

1
Designing a multi-arm, multi-stage platform trial for venous leg ulceration - Venous leg ulcers: management and eradication, the VEIN platform study.: Designing a platform/adaptive trial for venous leg ulcers (VLU) - The VEIN platform.设计用于下肢静脉溃疡的多臂、多阶段平台试验——下肢静脉溃疡:管理与根除,VEIN平台研究:设计用于下肢静脉溃疡(VLU)的平台/适应性试验——VEIN平台
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 14;5:32. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13847.1. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Living with chronic cough: experiences, burden and management in interstitial lung disease - a mixed methods study.间质性肺疾病患者慢性咳嗽的生活体验、负担及管理——一项混合方法研究
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Feb 25;11(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00641-2024. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
The McMaster Cough Severity Questionnaire (MCSQ): a cough severity instrument for patients with refractory chronic cough.麦克马斯特咳嗽严重程度问卷(MCSQ):一种用于难治性慢性咳嗽患者的咳嗽严重程度评估工具。
Eur Respir J. 2025 Feb 6;65(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01565-2024. Print 2025 Feb.
3
Patient satisfaction with the management of refractory and unexplained chronic cough in Canada: Results from a national survey.
加拿大患者对难治性和不明原因慢性咳嗽管理的满意度:一项全国性调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0308275. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308275. eCollection 2024.
4
Burden of Disease Associated with Refractory and Unexplained Chronic Cough in Canada: Results from a National Survey.与加拿大难治性和不明原因的慢性咳嗽相关的疾病负担:一项全国性调查的结果。
Lung. 2024 Aug;202(4):415-424. doi: 10.1007/s00408-024-00714-1. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
5
The Therapeutic Landscape in Chronic Cough.慢性咳嗽的治疗景观。
Lung. 2024 Feb;202(1):5-16. doi: 10.1007/s00408-023-00666-y. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
6
British Thoracic Society Clinical Statement on chronic cough in adults.英国胸科学会关于成人慢性咳嗽的临床声明。
Thorax. 2023 Dec 6;78(Suppl 6):s3-s19. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2023-220592.
7
Burden of chronic cough on social participation, healthcare resource utilisation and activities of daily living in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).慢性咳嗽对加拿大老龄化纵向研究(CLSA)中社会参与、医疗资源利用和日常生活活动的负担。
Respir Med. 2023 Nov-Dec;219:107431. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107431. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
8
Efficacy and Tolerability of Gefapixant for Treatment of Refractory or Unexplained Chronic Cough: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. gefapixant 治疗难治性或不明原因慢性咳嗽的疗效和耐受性:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2023 Oct 10;330(14):1359-1369. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.18035.
9
Identifying the asthma research priorities of people with asthma, their carers and other stakeholders.确定哮喘患者、其照顾者和其他利益相关者的哮喘研究重点。
Respirology. 2023 Jul;28(7):636-648. doi: 10.1111/resp.14492. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
10
Canadian Health Care Professionals' Familiarity with Chronic Cough Guidelines and Experiences with Diagnosis and Management: A Cross-Sectional Survey.加拿大医疗保健专业人员对慢性咳嗽指南的熟悉程度以及诊断和管理经验:一项横断面调查。
Lung. 2023 Feb;201(1):47-55. doi: 10.1007/s00408-023-00604-y. Epub 2023 Feb 18.