Suppr超能文献

个体因素对不同精神障碍筛查中粗心应答的影响:横断面研究

The Impact of Individual Factors on Careless Responding Across Different Mental Disorder Screenings: Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Kuang Huawei, Zhu Lichao, Yin Haonan, Zhang Zihe, Jing Biao, Kuang Junwei

机构信息

School of Energy and Constructional Engineering, Shandong Huayu University of Technology, Dezhou, China.

Tencent (China), Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 31;27:e70451. doi: 10.2196/70451.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Online questionnaires are widely used for large-scale screening. However, careless responding (CR) from participants can compromise the reliability of screening outcomes. Prior studies have focused on the effects of individual and environmental factors on CR, but the effect of questionnaire type remains underexplored.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the individual factors influencing CR in online mental health screening and assesses how the effect of these factors varies across different psychological questionnaires.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from 24,367 participants across 4 questionnaires (PHQ-9 [Patient Health Questionnaire-9], PSS [Perceived Stress Scale], ISI [Insomnia Severity Index], and GAD-7 [Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale]). CR was defined as the proportion of items completed in less than 2 seconds per item. We used a multiple linear regression model to examine the effect of individual factors (sex, age, education, smoking, and drinking) on CR across 4 questionnaires. In addition, response times were visualized to identify patterns between careless and careful responders.

RESULTS

Females demonstrate lower levels of CR than males when completing the PHQ-9 (β=-.172, 95% CI -0.104 to -0.089; P<.001), PSS (β=-.234, 95% CI -0.162 to -0.14; P<.001), ISI (β=-.207, 95% CI -0.13 to -0.114; P<.001), and GAD-7 (β=-.177, 95% CI -0.108 to -0.093; P<.001). Older participants demonstrated lower levels of CR on the PHQ-9 (β=-.036, 95% CI -0.007 to -0.003; P<.001), ISI (β=-.036, 95% CI -0.007 to -0.003; P<.001), and GAD-7 (β=-.053, 95% CI -0.009 to -0.005; P<.001), but their age was unrelated to CR on the PSS. Interestingly, compared with participants with an associate-level education, those with a high education (bachelor's, master's, or doctoral degree) demonstrated higher levels of CR, especially those with a master's degree (PHQ-9: β=.098, 95% CI 0.136 to 0.188; P<.001 and GAD-7: β=.091, 95% CI 0.125 to 0.178; P<.001). Smokers exhibited varied patterns, with current smokers demonstrating lower levels of CR on the PHQ-9 (β=-.022, 95% CI -0.064 to -0.016; P=.001) and GAD-7 (β=-.014, 95% CI -0.051 to -0.002; P=.03), whereas occasional smokers demonstrated higher levels of CR on the PSS (β=.019, 95% CI 0.010 to 0.050; P=.003) than nonsmokers. Drinkers demonstrated lower levels of CR than nondrinkers, with the strongest effect among occasional drinkers on the PHQ-9 (β=-.163, 95% CI -0.103 to -0.087; P<.001). Analysis of response times revealed that participants tended to spend less time on PHQ-9 and GAD-7 surveys, and CR on PSS and ISI surveys was characterized by skipping questions.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of individual factors on CR varies across questionnaire types. These findings offer valuable insights for questionnaire designers and administrators, highlighting the need for targeted intervention.

摘要

背景

在线问卷广泛用于大规模筛查。然而,参与者的粗心作答(CR)可能会损害筛查结果的可靠性。先前的研究集中于个体和环境因素对CR的影响,但问卷类型的影响仍未得到充分探索。

目的

本研究调查影响在线心理健康筛查中CR的个体因素,并评估这些因素的影响在不同心理问卷中的差异。

方法

本研究分析了来自4种问卷(PHQ-9[患者健康问卷-9]、PSS[感知压力量表]、ISI[失眠严重程度指数]和GAD-7[广泛性焦虑障碍-7量表])的24367名参与者的数据。CR被定义为每题用时少于2秒所完成的题目比例。我们使用多元线性回归模型来检验个体因素(性别、年龄、教育程度、吸烟和饮酒)对4种问卷中CR的影响。此外,对答题时间进行可视化处理,以识别粗心和认真答题者之间的模式。

结果

在完成PHQ-9(β=-.172,95%CI-0.104至-0.089;P<.001)、PSS(β=-.234,95%CI-0.162至-0.14;P<.001)、ISI(β=-.207,95%CI-0.13至-0.114;P<.001)和GAD-7(β=-.177,95%CI-0.108至-0.093;P<.001)时,女性的CR水平低于男性。年龄较大的参与者在PHQ-9(β=-.036,95%CI-0.007至-0.003;P<.001)、ISI(β=-.036,95%CI-0.007至-0.003;P<.001)和GAD-7(β=-.053,95%CI-0.009至-0.005;P<.001)上的CR水平较低,但他们的年龄与PSS上的CR无关。有趣的是,与副学士学位参与者相比,受过高等教育(学士、硕士或博士学位)的参与者表现出更高的CR水平,尤其是硕士学位者(PHQ-9:β=.098,95%CI0.136至0.188;P<.001和GAD-7:β=.091,95%CI0.125至0.178;P<.001)。吸烟者表现出不同的模式,当前吸烟者在PHQ-9(β=-.022,95%CI-0.064至-0.016;P=.001)和GAD-7(β=-.014,95%CI-0.051至-0.002;P=.03)上的CR水平较低,而偶尔吸烟者在PSS上的CR水平(β=.019,95%CI0.010至0.050;P=.003)高于不吸烟者。饮酒者的CR水平低于不饮酒者,偶尔饮酒者在PHQ-9上的影响最强(β=-.163,95%CI-0.103至-0.087;P<.001)。对答题时间的分析表明,参与者在PHQ-9和GAD-7调查上花费的时间往往较少,而PSS和ISI调查中的CR表现为跳过问题。

结论

个体因素对CR的影响因问卷类型而异。这些发现为问卷设计者和管理者提供了有价值的见解,突出了针对性干预的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4908/12323810/542a29ab536c/jmir-v27-e70451-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验