Jurewitsch Brian, Peters Colette, Okamoto Carol
Gastroenterology, St Michael's Hospital Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Gastroenterology, St Michael's Hospital Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 5;12(1):e001818. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001818.
This study aimed to explore the lived experiences and coping strategies of patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS) prescribed teduglutide and weaning off home parenteral nutrition (HPN), and to compare the quality of life (QOL) of these patients to patients with SBS but not prescribed teduglutide.
A qualitative study was conducted, with patients recruited from a specialist HPN clinic. Participants completed handwritten semi-structured daily diaries for 6 weeks and a validated Home Parenteral Nutrition-Quality of Life (HPN-QOL) paper-based questionnaire as part of what aimed to be a mixed methods cross-tracks study. Participants were age-matched with patients with SBS receiving HPN but not prescribed teduglutide, and these 'controls' also completed the HPN-QOL questionnaire. Data analysis involved qualitative analysis of diary entries using grounded theory methodology and descriptive analysis of HPN-QOL questionnaire responses.
Five participants completed the study and were matched with four 'controls'. All participants and 'controls' reported a high QOL with no differences observed between patients prescribed and not prescribed teduglutide. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants engaged in iterative cycles of problem-focused action and emotion-focused coping strategies to manage their condition and wean off parenteral nutrition (PN). Key subthemes included polyphagia and pleomorphism in diet, fatigue-related emotional distress and positive reframing using an objective scientific lens. Decisional regret was absent, participants agreed that treatment with teduglutide was the right choice for them, despite its challenges. Their goal of independence from PN was the main motivating factor.
This study provides valuable insights into the lived experiences and coping strategies of patients with SBS prescribed teduglutide to wean off PN. The findings underscore the importance of healthcare teams understanding these everyday challenges to facilitate shared decision-making and tailor care plans. Further research is needed to explore the long-term impact of teduglutide on QOL, including the validation of tools to screen for fatigue-related emotional distress and the development of targeted interventions to support patients during the weaning process.
本研究旨在探讨接受替度鲁肽治疗并逐渐停用家庭肠外营养(HPN)的短肠综合征(SBS)患者的生活经历和应对策略,并将这些患者的生活质量(QOL)与未接受替度鲁肽治疗的SBS患者进行比较。
进行了一项定性研究,从一家专业HPN诊所招募患者。参与者手写半结构化每日日记,为期6周,并完成一份经过验证的基于纸质版的家庭肠外营养-生活质量(HPN-QOL)问卷,这是一项旨在进行混合方法交叉研究的一部分。参与者与接受HPN但未接受替度鲁肽治疗的SBS患者年龄匹配,这些“对照组”也完成了HPN-QOL问卷。数据分析包括使用扎根理论方法对日记条目进行定性分析以及对HPN-QOL问卷回复进行描述性分析。
五名参与者完成了研究,并与四名“对照组”进行了匹配。所有参与者和“对照组”均报告生活质量较高,接受和未接受替度鲁肽治疗的患者之间未观察到差异。定性分析表明,参与者采用以问题为中心的行动和以情绪为中心的应对策略的迭代循环来管理自身状况并逐渐停用肠外营养(PN)。关键子主题包括饮食中的多食和多形性、与疲劳相关的情绪困扰以及使用客观科学视角进行积极的重新构建。不存在决策遗憾,参与者一致认为尽管使用替度鲁肽存在挑战,但该治疗对他们来说是正确的选择。他们摆脱PN实现独立的目标是主要的激励因素。
本研究为接受替度鲁肽治疗以逐渐停用PN的SBS患者的生活经历和应对策略提供了有价值的见解。研究结果强调了医疗团队了解这些日常挑战以促进共同决策和制定个性化护理计划的重要性。需要进一步研究以探讨替度鲁肽对生活质量的长期影响,包括验证用于筛查与疲劳相关的情绪困扰的工具以及开发针对性干预措施以在断奶过程中支持患者。