Hawarden Ashley, Bullock Laurna, Cox Natasha Marie, Nicholls Elaine, Protheroe Jo, Jinks Clare, Paskins Zoe
Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, High Lane, Burslem, Staffordshire, UK.
Arch Osteoporos. 2025 Aug 6;20(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s11657-025-01591-8.
An electronic survey of 341 UK primary care staff identified barriers to evidence-based osteoporosis care including low confidence in clinical skills, the complex nature of decision-making, insufficient incentivisation and lack of systematic case finding. Opportunities to enhance osteoporosis care may include enhanced education and wider utilisation of the extended workforce.
To investigate the beliefs, confidence and practices of general practice staff in the care of people with, or at increased risk of, osteoporotic fractures and the association between professional role and beliefs and confidence about osteoporosis care.
An electronic survey was designed and distributed to UK general practice staff, including healthcare professionals (HCPs) and non-healthcare professionals (non-HCPs). Content was informed by UK clinical guidelines, a scoping review and patient and clinical stakeholder input. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact test were utilised for analysis, with free text responses analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.
Three hundred forty-one responses were obtained (309 HCPs, 32 non-HCPs). Most responding HCPs (173, 62.2%) and non-HCPs (17, 70.8%) reported osteoporosis management of moderate priority. The majority of HCPs (228, 73.8%) agreed that they were worried about osteoporosis medicines causing unpleasant side effects. Most respondents (314, 98.7%) reported GPs as involved in osteoporosis care, followed by Pharmacists (241, 75.8%) and Practice Nurses (159, 50.0%). GPs and Pharmacists reported the highest level of agreement with confidence in osteoporosis medicine related skills. Fewer than a third of respondents reported systematic invitation of patients with risk factors (fracture, steroids or falls) for assessment. Free text responses indicated problems with communication between primary and secondary care, challenging decision-making, limited access to resources (e.g. DXA scan, dentistry) and insufficient incentivisation as barriers to delivery of recommended osteoporosis care.
Identified opportunities to improve osteoporosis care include improved education, incentivisation, automated case finding and involvement of the wider primary care workforce, particularly Pharmacists.
对341名英国基层医疗人员进行的电子调查发现了循证骨质疏松症护理的障碍,包括临床技能信心不足、决策的复杂性、激励不足以及缺乏系统性病例筛查。加强骨质疏松症护理的机会可能包括强化教育和更广泛地利用扩编人员。
调查全科医疗人员在照顾骨质疏松性骨折患者或骨折风险增加患者方面的信念、信心和做法,以及专业角色与对骨质疏松症护理的信念和信心之间的关联。
设计了一项电子调查并分发给英国全科医疗人员,包括医疗保健专业人员(HCP)和非医疗保健专业人员(非HCP)。内容参考了英国临床指南、范围综述以及患者和临床利益相关者的意见。采用描述性统计和费舍尔精确检验进行分析,对自由文本回复使用反思性主题分析。
共获得341份回复(309名HCP,32名非HCP)。大多数回复的HCP(173名,62.2%)和非HCP(17名,70.8%)报告称骨质疏松症管理的优先级为中等。大多数HCP(228名,73.8%)同意他们担心骨质疏松症药物会引起不良副作用。大多数受访者(314名,98.7%)报告称全科医生参与骨质疏松症护理,其次是药剂师(241名,75.8%)和执业护士(159名,50.0%)。全科医生和药剂师报告对骨质疏松症药物相关技能的信心达成程度最高。不到三分之一的受访者报告称会系统地邀请有风险因素(骨折、使用类固醇或跌倒)的患者进行评估。自由文本回复表明,基层医疗和二级医疗之间的沟通问题、具有挑战性的决策、资源获取有限(如双能X线吸收测定扫描、牙科服务)以及激励不足是提供推荐的骨质疏松症护理的障碍。
已确定的改善骨质疏松症护理的机会包括改善教育、激励措施、自动病例筛查以及扩编基层医疗人员的参与,尤其是药剂师。