• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨改善急性医疗到初级保健界面的骨质疏松症护理的障碍和机会:一项定性研究。

Exploring barriers and opportunities to improve osteoporosis care across the acute-to-primary care interface: a qualitative study.

机构信息

The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria St, NSW, Darlinghurst, Australia.

St George and Sutherland Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2023 Jul;34(7):1249-1262. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06748-0. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00198-023-06748-0
PMID:37093239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10281902/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

This qualitative study interviewed general practitioners, patients, and FLS clinicians and identified key challenges facing stakeholders seeking to improve post-fracture osteoporosis care. Local policies and care pathways as an initial strategy may address information and service delivery issues across the acute-primary care divide.

INTRODUCTION

Fracture liaison services (FLS) can be effective for secondary fracture prevention, but long-term adherence to therapies remains suboptimal. Few studies have explored how services manage the transition between tertiary and primary post-fracture care. This study mapped service processes and factors influencing integration of post-clinic care, identifying barriers, supports, and opportunities for seamless healthcare.

METHODS

Qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews with FLS stakeholders at two metropolitan hospitals in New South Wales (NSW) and surrounding general practices.

RESULTS

Seven FLS clinicians, 11 general practitioners (GPs), and seven patients were interviewed. Six key themes emerged on the transition of patient care from tertiary to primary care (PC). Interprofessional communication issues and role ambiguity posed threats to seamless care. Delayed, absent, inaccessible, or poor-quality communication frustrated GPs, while FLS clinicians lacked confidence in existing communication systems and desired bidirectional communication with PC. GPs were confident managing osteoporosis, but FLS clinicians had limited confidence that patients would discuss osteoporosis with their GP and that GPs would action recommendations. Effective PC follow-up required a positive GP-patient relationship and that patients perceived a need to engage with PC. Patient understanding of osteoporosis (influenced by patient education, knowledge, beliefs, and health behaviours) affected PC attendance. Limited public awareness of osteoporosis and healthcare policy deficits contributed to care gaps.

CONCLUSION

Key challenges were identified facing stakeholders seeking to improving post-clinic osteoporosis care. Development and implementation of local, integrated acute-community policies and care pathways as an initial intervention may address information and service delivery issues across the acute-PC divide.

摘要

未加标签

本定性研究采访了全科医生、患者和 FLS 临床医生,确定了利益相关者在寻求改善骨折后骨质疏松症护理方面面临的主要挑战。作为初始策略的地方政策和护理途径可能会解决急性-初级保健鸿沟中存在的信息和服务提供问题。

引言

骨折联络服务 (FLS) 可以有效地预防继发性骨折,但长期坚持治疗仍不理想。很少有研究探讨服务如何管理三级和初级骨折后护理之间的过渡。本研究绘制了服务流程,并确定了影响门诊后护理整合的因素,确定了障碍、支持和实现无缝医疗保健的机会。

方法

在新南威尔士州 (NSW) 两家大都市医院和周围的普通诊所对 FLS 利益相关者进行了定性描述性研究,使用半结构化访谈。

结果

采访了 7 名 FLS 临床医生、11 名全科医生 (GP) 和 7 名患者。在从三级护理向初级护理 (PC) 过渡的过程中出现了 6 个关键主题。跨专业沟通问题和角色模糊对无缝护理构成威胁。沟通延迟、缺失、无法访问或质量差使全科医生感到沮丧,而 FLS 临床医生对现有沟通系统缺乏信心,并希望与 PC 进行双向沟通。全科医生对管理骨质疏松症有信心,但 FLS 临床医生对患者会与全科医生讨论骨质疏松症以及全科医生会采取建议的信心有限。有效的 PC 随访需要良好的 GP-患者关系,并且患者认为需要与 PC 互动。患者对骨质疏松症的理解(受患者教育、知识、信仰和健康行为的影响)影响了 PC 的就诊率。公众对骨质疏松症的认识有限和医疗保健政策不足导致了护理差距。

结论

确定了利益相关者在寻求改善门诊后骨质疏松症护理方面面临的主要挑战。作为初始干预措施,制定和实施地方、综合的急性-社区政策和护理途径可能会解决急性-PC 鸿沟中的信息和服务提供问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7920/10281902/caef6d03959a/198_2023_6748_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7920/10281902/caef6d03959a/198_2023_6748_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7920/10281902/caef6d03959a/198_2023_6748_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring barriers and opportunities to improve osteoporosis care across the acute-to-primary care interface: a qualitative study.探讨改善急性医疗到初级保健界面的骨质疏松症护理的障碍和机会:一项定性研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Jul;34(7):1249-1262. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06748-0. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
2
Establishing consensus recommendations for long-term osteoporosis care for patients who have attended an Australian fracture liaison service: a Delphi study.制定澳大利亚骨折联络服务就诊患者长期骨质疏松症护理的共识建议:一项德尔菲研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Mar;35(3):373-389. doi: 10.1007/s00198-024-07014-7. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
3
Exploring practice and perspectives on shared decision-making about osteoporosis medicines in Fracture Liaison Services: the iFraP development qualitative study.探索骨折联络服务中关于骨质疏松症药物的共同决策的实践和观点:iFraP 发展定性研究。
Arch Osteoporos. 2024 Jun 19;19(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01410-6.
4
Rush Fracture Liaison Service for capturing "missed opportunities" to treat osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures.脆性骨折联络服务,以捕捉治疗脆性骨折患者骨质疏松症的“错失机会”。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1861-1874. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4559-9. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
5
Fracture liaison services for osteoporosis in the Asia-Pacific region: current unmet needs and systematic literature review.亚太地区骨质疏松性骨折联络服务:当前未满足的需求和系统文献回顾。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Apr;29(4):779-792. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4347-y. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
6
Secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: evaluation of the Lille University Hospital's Fracture Liaison Service between January 2016 and January 2018.骨质疏松性骨折的二级预防:2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月期间里尔大学医院骨折联络服务的评估。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Sep;30(9):1779-1788. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05036-0. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
7
Implementation of the Western Australian Osteoporosis Model of Care: a fracture liaison service utilising emergency department information systems to identify patients with fragility fracture to improve current practice and reduce re-fracture rates: a 12-month analysis.西澳骨质疏松症护理模式的实施:利用急诊信息系统识别脆性骨折患者的骨折联络服务,以改善当前实践并降低再骨折率:为期 12 个月的分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1759-1770. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4526-5. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
8
The Fracture Liaison Service to close the osteoporosis care gap: a leadership educational model for undergraduate and postgraduate trainees.骨折联络服务以缩小骨质疏松症护理差距:本科和研究生培训生的领导力教育模式。
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Mar;39(3):619-626. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04796-8. Epub 2019 Nov 23.
9
Implementing a fracture liaison service open model of care utilizing a cloud-based tool.利用基于云的工具实施骨折联络服务开放式护理模式。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Apr;29(4):953-960. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4371-y. Epub 2018 Feb 10.
10
Development of a cloud-based application for the Fracture Liaison Service model of care.为骨折联络服务护理模式开发基于云的应用程序。
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Feb;27(2):683-90. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3260-5. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Initiation of anti-osteoporosis medication following hip fracture in older adults: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies from patient and healthcare professional perspectives.老年人髋部骨折后抗骨质疏松药物的使用:一项基于患者和医护人员视角的定性研究的系统评价与主题综合分析
Age Ageing. 2025 Aug 1;54(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf237.
2
Family physicians' attitudes and practice on screening and prevention of fragility fractures, and shared decision-making with postmenopausal women: a qualitative study in Spain.家庭医生对脆性骨折筛查与预防的态度及实践,以及与绝经后女性的共同决策:西班牙的一项定性研究
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Aug 20;26(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02966-z.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term persistence of treatment after hip fracture in a fracture liaison service.骨折联络服务中髋部骨折治疗后的长期持续治疗。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 7;12(1):9373. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13465-x.
2
The global prevalence of osteoporosis in the world: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.全球骨质疏松症的患病率:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Oct 17;16(1):609. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02772-0.
3
An Adaptable Framework for Factors Contributing to Medication Adherence: Results from a Systematic Review of 102 Conceptual Frameworks.
Osteoporosis care in primary care settings: a national UK e-survey.
英国初级医疗保健机构中的骨质疏松症护理:一项全国性电子调查。
Arch Osteoporos. 2025 Aug 6;20(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s11657-025-01591-8.
4
Implementing pharmacist-led home medicines reviews within fracture liaison services for better post-fracture care: a qualitative study of patient and practitioner experience.在骨折联络服务中实施由药剂师主导的家庭药物审查以改善骨折后护理:一项关于患者和从业者体验的定性研究
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07589-9.
5
Primary care follow-up of patients after attending a fracture liaison service: an integrative review.骨折联络服务后患者的初级保健随访:一项综合综述。
Arch Osteoporos. 2025 May 13;20(1):65. doi: 10.1007/s11657-025-01521-8.
6
Women's knowledge concerning osteoporosis at Al Diwaniyah State, Iraq: A cross-sectional design study.伊拉克迪瓦尼亚市女性对骨质疏松症的认知:一项横断面设计研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Mar 28;14:104. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_722_24. eCollection 2025.
7
Opportunistic assessment of osteoporosis using hip and pelvic X-rays with OsteoSight™: validation of an AI-based tool in a US population.使用OsteoSight™通过髋部和骨盆X光片对骨质疏松症进行机会性评估:一种基于人工智能的工具在美国人群中的验证
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Jun;36(6):1053-1060. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07487-0. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
8
Integrated model of secondary fracture prevention in primary care (INTERCEPT): protocol for a cluster randomised controlled multicentre trial.初级保健中继发性骨折预防的综合模型(INTERCEPT):一项集群随机对照多中心试验的方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Sep 28;25(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02601-3.
9
Perspectives of healthcare providers on osteoporosis, falls and fracture risk: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.医务人员对骨质疏松症、跌倒和骨折风险的看法:系统评价和定性研究的主题综合分析。
Arch Osteoporos. 2024 Sep 24;19(1):90. doi: 10.1007/s11657-024-01446-8.
10
Development of self-administered questionnaire on barriers, prescription practices, and guideline adherence of osteoporosis management among tertiary care clinicians: content validity and reliability analysis.中文译文: 中文版自填式问卷评估三级保健临床医生在骨质疏松症管理方面的障碍、处方实践和指南遵循情况的研制:内容效度和信度分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 6;15:1393500. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1393500. eCollection 2024.
一个适用于导致药物依从性因素的可适应框架:来自 102 个概念框架的系统评价的结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Sep;36(9):2784-2795. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06648-1. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
4
GP perceptions on improving a secondary care-based Fracture Liaison Service (FLS).全科医生对改善基于二级护理的骨折联络服务(FLS)的看法。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Dec;31(12):2493-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05648-x. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
5
Threats to safe transitions from hospital to home: a consensus study in North West London primary care.从医院到家庭安全过渡的威胁:西北伦敦初级保健共识研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Dec 26;70(690):e9-e19. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X707105. Print 2020 Jan.
6
Determinants, consequences and potential solutions to poor adherence to anti-osteoporosis treatment: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF).抗骨质疏松治疗依从性差的决定因素、后果和潜在解决方案:欧洲临床和经济骨科学会(ESCEO)和国际骨质疏松基金会(IOF)组织的专家组会议的结果。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Nov;30(11):2155-2165. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05104-5. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
7
Comparison of Interventions to Improve Long-Term Medication Adherence Across Different Clinical Conditions: A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis.不同临床情况下改善长期药物依从性的干预措施比较:一项网状Meta分析的系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Dec 24;9:1454. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01454. eCollection 2018.
8
The Cost of Osteoporosis, Osteopenia, and Associated Fractures in Australia in 2017.2017 年澳大利亚骨质疏松症、低骨量和相关骨折的成本。
J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Apr;34(4):616-625. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3640. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
9
Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.骨折联络服务可改善骨质疏松性骨折患者的结局:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Bone. 2018 Jun;111:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
10
Secondary prevention of fractures after hip fracture: a qualitative study of effective service delivery.髋部骨折后骨折的二级预防:有效服务提供的定性研究
Osteoporos Int. 2016 May;27(5):1719-27. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3452-z. Epub 2016 Jan 12.