School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Arch Osteoporos. 2023 Dec 20;19(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01361-4.
We conducted a survey of FLSs' consultation conduct and content which identified marked variation in whether FLS HCPs discussed osteoporosis medicine with patients. A review of service pro formas showed more content related to 'investigating' and 'intervening' than to 'informing'. We propose an expanded FLS typology and model FLS pro forma.
To investigate the nature of direct patient contact in fracture liaison service (FLS) delivery, examine the use and content of pro formas to guide information eliciting and sharing in FLS consultations, and determine service changes which were implemented as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
An electronic survey of UK FLS healthcare practitioners (HCPs) was distributed through clinical networks, social media, and other professional networks. Participants were asked to upload service pro formas used to guide consultation content. Documentary analysis findings were mapped to UK FLS clinical standards.
Forty-seven HCPs responded, providing data on 39 UK FLSs, over half of all 74 FLSs reporting to FLS-database. Results showed variation in which HCP made clinical decisions, whether medicines were discussed with patients or not, and in prescribing practice. Services were variably affected by COVID, with most reporting a move to more remote consulting. The documentary analysis of eight service pro formas showed that these contained more content related to 'investigating' and 'intervening', with fewer pro formas prompting the clinician to offer information and support (e.g., about coping with pain). Based on our findings we propose an expanded FLS typology and have developed a model FLS pro forma.
There is marked variation in the delivery of services and content of consultations in UK FLSs including discussion about osteoporosis medications. Clinical standards for FLSs should clarify the roles of primary and secondary HCPs and the importance of holistic approaches to patient care.
我们对 FLS 的咨询行为和内容进行了调查,发现 FLS 医疗保健提供者是否与患者讨论骨质疏松症药物存在明显差异。对服务表单的审查表明,与“调查”和“干预”相关的内容多于“告知”。我们提出了一个扩展的 FLS 分类法和模型 FLS 表单。
调查骨折联络服务 (FLS) 提供中直接与患者接触的性质,检查表单在引导 FLS 咨询中信息收集和共享方面的使用和内容,并确定由于 COVID-19 大流行而实施的服务变更。
通过临床网络、社交媒体和其他专业网络向英国 FLS 医疗保健从业者 (HCP) 分发电子调查。要求参与者上传用于指导咨询内容的服务表单。将文件分析结果映射到英国 FLS 临床标准。
47 名 HCP 做出了回应,提供了 39 个英国 FLS 的数据,占向 FLS 数据库报告的 74 个 FLS 的一半以上。结果表明,在临床决策、是否与患者讨论药物以及处方实践方面,不同的 HCP 存在差异。COVID 对服务产生了不同的影响,大多数服务都转向了更远程的咨询。对八个服务表单的文件分析表明,这些表单包含了更多与“调查”和“干预”相关的内容,而较少的表单提示临床医生提供信息和支持(例如,关于应对疼痛)。基于我们的发现,我们提出了一个扩展的 FLS 分类法,并开发了一个模型 FLS 表单。
英国 FLS 的服务提供和咨询内容存在明显差异,包括讨论骨质疏松症药物。FLS 的临床标准应明确初级和二级 HCP 的角色以及整体治疗方法对患者护理的重要性。