Suppr超能文献

在调整初始学习强度后,语义侵入错误可区分血浆p-tau呈阳性与呈阴性的遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者。

Semantic intrusion errors differentiate between amnestic MCI who are plasma p-tau+ from p-tau- after adjusting for initial learning strength.

作者信息

Curiel Cid Rosie E, Vaillancourt David, Ortega Alexandra, Crocco Elizabeth A, Crenshaw Kirsten, Remedios Stephanie M, Asken Breton M, Armstrong Melissa J, Uribe Idaly Velez, Wang Wei-En, Rosselli Monica, Adjouadi Malek, Marsiske Michael, Barker Warren W, DeKosky Steven, Smith Glenn, Duara Ranjan, Loewenstein David A

机构信息

1Florida Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC), Miami, FL, United States.

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and Aging (CNSA), Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 22;16:1613694. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1613694. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Semantic intrusion errors (SIEs) are associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is unknown whether accounting for maximum learning capacity still leads to an increase in SIEs when elevated plasma p-tau, a biological indicator of underlying AD, is present.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-eight older adult participants completed the Loewenstein-Acevedo Scales for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L), a sensitive cognitive challenge test designed to elicit SIEs. Of these, 108 were clinically diagnosed with amnestic MCI (aMCI). Fifty-eight individuals met or exceeded a plasma p-tau positivity of >5 pg/ml, while 50 individuals scored below this threshold.

RESULTS

After adjusting for demographic covariates and maximum learning capacity, the aMCI p-tau+ group evidenced more SIEs compared to aMCI p-tau- on the first (list B1; = 0.035) and second trials of the competing list (list B2; = 0.006). Biological predictors such as ε4 status, higher p-tau, and older age were predictors of an elevated number of SIEs [list B2: (3,104) = 10.92; = 0.001; = 0.489)].

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike previous studies that used amyloid PET or other plasma biomarkers, individuals with aMCI p-tau+ evidenced more SIEs, even after adjusting for their initial learning capacity, a covariate that has not been studied previously. These findings support that SIEs are more prevalent in the presence of underlying AD pathology and occur independent of learning deficits.

摘要

背景

语义侵入错误(SIEs)与阿尔茨海默病(AD)所致的轻度认知障碍(MCI)相关。当存在血浆p-tau升高(潜在AD的生物学指标)时,考虑最大学习能力是否仍会导致SIEs增加尚不清楚。

方法

158名老年参与者完成了用于语义干扰和学习的洛温斯坦-阿塞维多量表(LASSI-L),这是一项旨在引发SIEs的敏感认知挑战测试。其中,108人被临床诊断为遗忘型MCI(aMCI)。58人血浆p-tau阳性且超过或等于>5 pg/ml,而50人得分低于此阈值。

结果

在调整人口统计学协变量和最大学习能力后,aMCI p-tau+组在竞争列表的第一次(列表B1;P = 0.035)和第二次试验(列表B2;P = 0.006)中比aMCI p-tau-组表现出更多的SIEs。诸如ε4状态、较高的p-tau和较高年龄等生物学预测指标是SIEs数量增加的预测因素[列表B2:F(3,104)= 10.92;P = 0.001;η² = 0.489]。

结论

与之前使用淀粉样蛋白PET或其他血浆生物标志物的研究不同,aMCI p-tau+个体即使在调整了他们最初的学习能力(一个以前未研究过的协变量)后,仍表现出更多的SIEs。这些发现支持SIEs在存在潜在AD病理时更普遍,并且独立于学习缺陷而发生。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验