• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无法从主动性语义干扰中恢复的不同方面预示着从遗忘型轻度认知障碍发展为痴呆症的进展速度。

Different aspects of failing to recover from proactive semantic interference predicts rate of progression from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to dementia.

作者信息

Curiel Cid Rosie E, Crocco Elizabeth A, Duara Ranjan, Vaillancourt David, Asken Breton, Armstrong Melissa J, Adjouadi Malek, Georgiou Mike, Marsiske Michael, Wang Wei-In, Rosselli Monica, Barker William W, Ortega Alexandra, Hincapie Diana, Gallardo Liz, Alkharboush Feras, DeKosky Steven, Smith Glenn, Loewenstein David A

机构信息

Florida Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Miami, FL, United States.

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience and Aging, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.

出版信息

Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Jan 31;16:1336008. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1336008. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fnagi.2024.1336008
PMID:38357533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10864586/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated the role of proactive semantic interference (frPSI) in predicting the progression of amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) to dementia, taking into account various cognitive and biological factors.

METHODS

The research involved 89 older adults with aMCI who underwent baseline assessments, including amyloid PET and MRI scans, and were followed longitudinally over a period ranging from 12 to 55 months (average 26.05 months).

RESULTS

The findings revealed that more than 30% of the participants diagnosed with aMCI progressed to dementia during the observation period. Using Cox Proportional Hazards modeling and adjusting for demographic factors, global cognitive function, hippocampal volume, and amyloid positivity, two distinct aspects of frPSI were identified as significant predictors of a faster decline to dementia. These aspects were fewer correct responses on a frPSI trial and a higher number of semantic intrusion errors on the same trial, with 29.5% and 31.6 % increases in the likelihood of more rapid progression to dementia, respectively.

DISCUSSION

These findings after adjustment for demographic and biological markers of Alzheimer's Disease, suggest that assessing frPSI may offer valuable insights into the risk of dementia progression in individuals with aMCI.

摘要

引言

本研究探讨了前瞻性语义干扰(frPSI)在预测遗忘型轻度认知障碍(aMCI)向痴呆症进展中的作用,同时考虑了各种认知和生物学因素。

方法

该研究涉及89名患有aMCI的老年人,他们接受了包括淀粉样蛋白PET和MRI扫描在内的基线评估,并在12至55个月(平均26.05个月)的时间内进行了纵向随访。

结果

研究结果显示,在观察期内,超过30%被诊断为aMCI的参与者进展为痴呆症。使用Cox比例风险模型并对人口统计学因素、整体认知功能、海马体积和淀粉样蛋白阳性进行调整后,frPSI的两个不同方面被确定为更快发展为痴呆症的重要预测因素。这两个方面分别是在frPSI试验中正确反应较少以及在同一试验中语义侵入错误较多,发展为痴呆症的可能性分别增加29.5%和31.6%。

讨论

在对阿尔茨海默病的人口统计学和生物学标志物进行调整后,这些发现表明,评估frPSI可能为了解aMCI患者痴呆症进展风险提供有价值的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1319/10864586/60727159fc4e/fnagi-16-1336008-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1319/10864586/60727159fc4e/fnagi-16-1336008-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1319/10864586/60727159fc4e/fnagi-16-1336008-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Different aspects of failing to recover from proactive semantic interference predicts rate of progression from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to dementia.无法从主动性语义干扰中恢复的不同方面预示着从遗忘型轻度认知障碍发展为痴呆症的进展速度。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2024 Jan 31;16:1336008. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1336008. eCollection 2024.
2
The Association Between Plasma Amyloid-β 42/40 and Percentage of Semantic Intrusion Errors in Mild Cognitive Impairment.血浆淀粉样蛋白β 42/40 与轻度认知障碍语义侵入错误百分比的关系。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;101(4):1195-1204. doi: 10.3233/JAD-240164.
3
Semantic intrusion errors as a function of age, amyloid, and volumetric loss: a confirmatory path analysis.语义侵入错误随年龄、淀粉样蛋白和容积损失的变化:一项验证性路径分析。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2022 Nov;34(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220004007. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
4
A novel method of evaluating semantic intrusion errors to distinguish between amyloid positive and negative groups on the Alzheimer's disease continuum.一种评估语义侵入错误以区分阿尔茨海默病连续体上淀粉样蛋白阳性和阴性组的新方法。
J Psychiatr Res. 2020 May;124:131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
5
Utilizing semantic intrusions to identify amyloid positivity in mild cognitive impairment.利用语义入侵来识别轻度认知障碍中的淀粉样蛋白阳性。
Neurology. 2018 Sep 4;91(10):e976-e984. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006128. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
6
A Novel Computerized Cognitive Test for the Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Its Association with Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's Disease Prone Brain Regions.一种用于检测轻度认知障碍及其与阿尔茨海默病易感脑区神经退行性变相关性的新型计算机化认知测试。
Adv Alzheimer Dis. 2023 Sep;12(3):38-54. doi: 10.4236/aad.2023.123004. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
7
A cognitive stress test for prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Multiethnic generalizability.一种针对前驱期阿尔茨海默病的认知应激测试:多民族通用性。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2019 Aug 2;11:550-559. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.05.003. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Semantic Intrusions and Failure to Recover From Semantic Interference in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Relationship to Amyloid and Cortical Thickness.轻度认知障碍中语义入侵和无法从语义干扰中恢复:与淀粉样蛋白和皮质厚度的关系。
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15(9):848-855. doi: 10.2174/1567205015666180427122746.
9
Intrusion Errors and Progression of Cognitive Deficits in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment and PreMCI States.老年人轻度认知障碍和 PreMCI 状态下的认知缺陷的入侵错误和进展。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2021;50(2):135-142. doi: 10.1159/000512804. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
10
Semantic Intrusion Error Ratio Distinguishes Between Cognitively Impaired and Cognitively Intact African American Older Adults.语义入侵错误率可区分认知受损和认知正常的非裔美国老年成年人。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73(2):785-790. doi: 10.3233/JAD-191022.

引用本文的文献

1
Semantic intrusion errors differentiate between amnestic MCI who are plasma p-tau+ from p-tau- after adjusting for initial learning strength.在调整初始学习强度后,语义侵入错误可区分血浆p-tau呈阳性与呈阴性的遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者。
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 22;16:1613694. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1613694. eCollection 2025.
2
Unraveling progressive verbal memory deficits in Huntington's disease: insights from the LASSI-L.揭示亨廷顿舞蹈症中进行性言语记忆缺陷:来自语言学习与记忆评估量表-长版的见解
Front Neurol. 2025 Feb 19;16:1494816. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1494816. eCollection 2025.
3
Digital Migration of the Loewenstein Acevedo Scales for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L): Development and Validation Study in Older Participants.

本文引用的文献

1
A review of novel Cognitive Challenge Tests for the assessment of preclinical Alzheimer's disease.新型认知挑战测试在临床前阿尔茨海默病评估中的应用综述。
Neuropsychology. 2023 Sep;37(6):661-672. doi: 10.1037/neu0000883. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
2
Salient Cognitive Paradigms to Assess Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease.评估临床前阿尔茨海默病的显著认知范式。
Neurotherapeutics. 2022 Jan;19(1):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01192-0. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
3
Changes in LASSI-L performance over time among older adults with amnestic MCI and amyloid positivity: A preliminary study.
用于语义干扰和学习的洛温斯坦·阿塞韦多量表(LASSI-L)的数字迁移:老年参与者的开发与验证研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Feb 19;12:e64716. doi: 10.2196/64716.
4
Informing etiological heterogeneity of mild cognitive impairment and risk for progression to dementia with plasma p-tau217.血浆p-tau217揭示轻度认知障碍的病因异质性及进展为痴呆症的风险。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Jan;12(1):100011. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100011. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
遗忘型轻度认知障碍且淀粉样蛋白阳性的老年人中 LASSI-L 表现随时间的变化:一项初步研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Nov;143:98-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.08.033. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
4
Intrusion Errors and Progression of Cognitive Deficits in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment and PreMCI States.老年人轻度认知障碍和 PreMCI 状态下的认知缺陷的入侵错误和进展。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2021;50(2):135-142. doi: 10.1159/000512804. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
5
Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment is Characterized by the Inability to Recover from Proactive Semantic Interference across Multiple Learning Trials.遗忘型轻度认知障碍的特征是无法从多次学习试验中的前瞻性语义干扰中恢复过来。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(2):181-187. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.3.
6
Semantic intrusion errors as a function of age, amyloid, and volumetric loss: a confirmatory path analysis.语义侵入错误随年龄、淀粉样蛋白和容积损失的变化:一项验证性路径分析。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2022 Nov;34(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220004007. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
7
A novel method of evaluating semantic intrusion errors to distinguish between amyloid positive and negative groups on the Alzheimer's disease continuum.一种评估语义侵入错误以区分阿尔茨海默病连续体上淀粉样蛋白阳性和阴性组的新方法。
J Psychiatr Res. 2020 May;124:131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
8
A cognitive stress test for prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Multiethnic generalizability.一种针对前驱期阿尔茨海默病的认知应激测试:多民族通用性。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2019 Aug 2;11:550-559. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2019.05.003. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
Types of errors on a semantic interference task in mild cognitive impairment and dementia.轻度认知障碍和痴呆症语义干扰任务中的错误类型。
Neuropsychology. 2019 Jul;33(5):670-684. doi: 10.1037/neu0000542. Epub 2019 May 9.
10
Effect of age, ethnicity, sex, cognitive status and APOE genotype on amyloid load and the threshold for amyloid positivity.年龄、种族、性别、认知状态和 APOE 基因型对淀粉样蛋白负荷和淀粉样蛋白阳性阈值的影响。
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;22:101800. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101800. Epub 2019 Mar 27.