Nobori Tatsuya, Takegami Yasuhiko, Tokutake Katsuhiro, Nakashima Hiroaki, Mishima Kenichi, Okamoto Masanori, Okui Nobuyuki, Imagama Shiro
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Department of Hand Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2025 May;87(2):295-304. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.87.2.295.
The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes between in situ fixation and fixation after reduction of severe valgus-impacted femoral neck fractures in patients aged 65 years or older. This was a multicenter retrospective study of 561 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for femoral neck fracture. From this population, we selected patients aged 65 years and older with severe valgus-impacted femoral neck fractures characterized by a Garden alignment index greater than 15 degrees compared to that on the non-injury side. After exclusion criteria were applied, the study included 92 patients who were categorized into two groups: in situ fixation group (n = 56) and fixation after reduction group (n = 36). Our analysis covered patient demographics, surgical details, postoperative complications, radiographic evaluations, Numeric Rating Scale for pain, and Parker's Mobility Score for clinical outcomes. Bone union was achieved in all patients. The incidence of avascular necrosis was consistent between the groups. Patients in the reduction group reported lower Numeric Rating Scale scores (mean: 0 vs 2, p = 0.003) and higher Parker's Mobility Score scores (mean: 7 vs 6, p = 0.009) compared with the in situ group. Radiographically, the reduction group showed significantly lower femoral neck shortening (mean: 4.75 mm vs 5.75 mm, p = 0.049) and a reduced length of cannulated cancellous screw backout (mean: 3.4 mm vs 5.4 mm, p = 0.007) at the final follow-up. Fixation after reduction for severe valgus-impacted femoral neck fractures in patients aged 65 and above appears to be a safe and effective approach.
本研究的目的是评估和比较65岁及以上严重外翻嵌插型股骨颈骨折患者原位固定与复位后固定的临床和影像学结果。这是一项对561例行股骨颈骨折切开复位内固定术患者的多中心回顾性研究。从该人群中,我们选择了65岁及以上、具有严重外翻嵌插型股骨颈骨折的患者,其Garden对线指数与未受伤侧相比大于15度。应用排除标准后,该研究纳入了92例患者,分为两组:原位固定组(n = 56)和复位后固定组(n = 36)。我们的分析涵盖了患者人口统计学、手术细节、术后并发症、影像学评估、疼痛数字评分量表以及临床结果的帕克活动评分。所有患者均实现了骨愈合。两组间缺血性坏死的发生率一致。与原位固定组相比,复位组患者的疼痛数字评分量表得分更低(平均值:0对2,p = 0.003),帕克活动评分得分更高(平均值:7对6,p = 0.009)。在影像学上,复位组在末次随访时股骨颈缩短明显更少(平均值:4.75 mm对5.75 mm,p = 0.049),空心松质骨螺钉退出长度缩短(平均值:3.4 mm对5.4 mm,p = 0.007)。对于65岁及以上严重外翻嵌插型股骨颈骨折患者,复位后固定似乎是一种安全有效的方法。