Javidialsaadi Mousa, Albert Scott T, Moufarrej S Al Mutairi Badr, Wang Jinsung
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 31:2024.05.03.592370. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.03.592370.
When humans encounter the same perturbation twice, they typically adapt faster the second time, a phenomenon called savings. Studies have examined savings following adaptation to a gradually introduced perturbation, with mixed results. These inconsistencies might be caused by differences in how behavior returns to its baseline state during the 'washout' phase in between learning periods. To test this, participants controlled a cursor that was subject to a visual rotation in its motion direction. The rotation was applied during two learning periods, separated by a washout period where the rotation was removed abruptly, gradually, or without error feedback. We found that the type of error experienced during washout affected savings: abrupt washout with large errors eliminated savings, whereas gradual or no-feedback washout preserved it. Model-based analyses indicated these effects were driven by changes in error sensitivity suggesting that salient, opposing errors experienced during washout downregulate the response to error, nullifying savings.
当人类两次遇到相同的扰动时,他们通常第二次适应得更快,这种现象称为节省。研究已经考察了在适应逐渐引入的扰动后的节省情况,结果不一。这些不一致可能是由于在学习阶段之间的“消退”阶段行为恢复到基线状态的方式不同所致。为了对此进行测试,参与者控制一个在运动方向上会发生视觉旋转的光标。在两个学习阶段应用旋转,中间间隔一个消退阶段,在消退阶段旋转被突然、逐渐移除或没有错误反馈。我们发现,消退期间经历的错误类型会影响节省:伴有大错误的突然消退消除了节省,而逐渐或无反馈消退则保留了节省。基于模型的分析表明,这些效应是由错误敏感性的变化驱动的,这表明在消退期间经历的显著、相反的错误会下调对错误的反应,从而消除节省。